• PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Those people are just clarifying headlines that give no idea how long the plane was in service. If they’ve been in service for over a decade it stands to reason that the maintenance on the plane might have been faulty. OFC Boeing should be investigated due to the door plug blow-out, and have previously demonstrated their willingness to cut corners with the Max debacle. That doesn’t mean every incident is their direct fault, and Airbus can suffer similar incidents but not be reported on.

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Apparently not wanting to burn Boeing to the ground regardless of who was in the wrong is a sign of being a bot

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Er, no - because the crashes weren’t the topic. It was just very sudden-left-turn which felt bot-like. Agreed about the Boeing crashes, they’re just different from the deaths of the Boeing whistleblowers.

          • PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I was responding to someone who specifically brought up the crashes…

            It’s gotta be the same trolls that visit every Boeing thread claiming accidents are the fault of the airport not the manufacturer. They are fucking relentless.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah I saw that. They said “The trolls talk about the crashes” and then you were talking about the crashes. Which, y’know, is kind of funny.