• dalekcaan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, but you’re not asking him what his brother likes, you’re asking him what he would say he likes, which is what flips it. You’re basically making sure the answer is a lie regardless of which brother you ask.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The truth is that the whole setup is moot if it’s one of the door-guards that tells you the rules, since they might be lying about the whole thing. There needs to be a trusted third-party involved, who knows about the guards but doesn’t know which one’s lying and which one’s telling the truth.

      • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        True. It seems there are different versions of the puzzle, but from a quick search it was popularized by the movie Labyrinth, and there they get around it by having a second set of guards who don’t know the answer explain the setup.

      • kakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I really like this idea, and now I want to put it in a session. Like, we go through the whole 2-brothers riddle, but it turns out that the one explaining the rules is the one lying.

        Maybe both doors lead to “death”/encounters, maybe the players are free to just walk past the brothers without consequence, maybe a third more interesting thing happens.