• emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Having the public lose trust in the safety of flying is something I absolutely want to happen. This will have devastating effects on carbon emissions, and push more people (and governments) towards trains.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Devastating is a bit of an exaggeration with it being responsible for a whooping 3% (at most) of emissions and arguably helping raise the albedo a bit with their contrails.

      So it would help a bit, it wouldn’t be a game changer though (except if you live near an airport, sound is another pollution that’s often ignored).

    • dukk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean, I don’t think that’s the way to go about it. Trains don’t take me to my family across the planet in 11 hours. I’d prefer to feel secure when flying there.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Airbus will still be (mostly) safe. And I’m more concerned with the number of flights - particularly short flights that can be substituted by trains - than with flying per se. For long-distance travel, we don’t have a comparable alternative (yet).