• yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Step one… create consent deepfake…

    I don’t like that I thought it… But It pains me to say it will be used as a defense at some point.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh wow… You could use a consent deep fake to trick another person to create the sex one. This gets messy quick…

    • Entropywins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I just imagine someone showing up to my work and presenting that contract and next thing you know I’m stuck in the dryer with only my stepson Esteban to help me…

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You’re not the first to think of it and it’s where this whole idea will fall flat on it’s face.

      There’s just no way to actually check if the subject of a photo consented to having their photo taken. That was difficult enough with physical cameras, it’s so much more difficult now that no camera is involved in generating the image.

      I mean, if I were to post an image here in this comment - how can the Fediverse possibly verify that I have the right to post it?