Hundreds have joined a UK class action lawsuit against LGBTQ+ dating app Grindr, seeking damages over a historical case of the company allegedly forwarding users’ HIV status as well as other sensitive data to third-party advertisers.

This data included a user’s HIV status and their last test date, their sexual preferences, and their GPS location – all of which were added to public profiles by users and later gathered up by Grindr’s trackers.

The Norwegian Data Protection Authority (NO DPA) fined Grindr 65 million Norwegian kroner in 2020 ($5.9 million at today’s exchange rate) for violating GDPR’s consent rules. NO DPA’s case didn’t mention any violations regarding the sharing of HIV data or information about a user’s sexual preferences. However, it ruled that third parties had received a user’s GPS location, IP address, advertising ID, age, gender, and the fact that they used the app, and concluded that Grindr had disclosed user data to third parties “for behavioural advertisement without a legal basis.”

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said in October last year it was pushing for the FTC to probe the app maker after finding that it was retaining user data even after accounts were deleted – a practice Grindr’s privacy policy explicitly says it wouldn’t do.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This isn’t surprising, it wasn’t that long ago one of their executives said he opposed gay marriage. They absolutely just see their users as cash cows.

    • mihor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bu that’s the general view of executives pretty much in all big companies. I mean about the users being cash cows. It’s irrelevant what executives think about LGBTQ+ community, they know very well that pecunia non olet (cash doesn’t stink) so they ignore their own views, whichever they may be.