• Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think what OC was getting at was how some animal breeds are bred with very limited groups to maintain desired bloodlines/genes. This leads to health issues due to inbreeding.

      Pug dogs are a somewhat common example; same with a lot of ‘pure bred’ dog breeds.

      I’m not sure how much that applies to sphinx cats.

      With a quick search, this comes up:

      https://faqcats.com/is-breeding-sphynx-cats-cruel/

      It can be done ethically, with a sufficient gene pool. It can also be done cruelly; especially when profit is involved. I can’t say I have much faith in it being done ethically… But I’m sure there are some alright groups out there.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      do you really think cats like this happen by accident? hairless cats have a mutation that prevents them from growing a coat. you have to admit it’s a special kind of sick mind that breeds hairless cats in canada lol (where these breeds were started). they’re also more likely to have skin cancer issues and early life respiratory issues.

      I look at it like pugs and frenchies - victims of animal abuse by breeders who don’t care about the actual quality of life the animal has, only about profiting on their sale.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wouldn’t blame anyone who thought this happened by accident. Evolution is capable of some amazing (and amazingly fucked up) things.

        Hairless cats have always kinda freaked me out, though. At least now I can disguise my ignorant revulsion as an ethical issue, though, so thanks!

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I wouldn’t blame anyone who thought this happened by accident.

          ok. you do you. hairlessness is pretty rare in the animal kingdom - hair confers so many advantages, from reducing uv exposure to insulation and style baby, er, camouflage. the people who bred these cats to be this way took generations of selective breeding, and probably in-breeding, to get this specific look.

          I think treating animals this way is fucking sick, and cruel. Like I said - you do you.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Are we inbred?

              are your mom & dad siblings or cousins?

              why do I have to be the one who does your fuckin’ research pugsly? jfc grow up.

              “I’m asking for data, research, not emotion” - get fucked.

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            hairlessness is pretty rare in the animal kingdom

            As justification to why hairlessness is bad; This line’s kinda funny comming from a hairless ape who’s species dominates the planet…

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              hairless ape

              man I wish I could save money on shampoo and barbers but ‘hairless ape’ is only hairless by comparison. think they meant completely hairless, like alopecia? or is it just a figure of speech?

              hmmmm… I’ll let you figure it out on your own time.