Iran said it launched dozens of drones and ballistic missiles towards Israel on Saturday in a major attack following days of acute tension building up in the region and warnings from the US and elsewhere about a wider conflict erupting.

Air attack warning sirens began wailing over Jerusalem just before 2am local time on Sunday after the weapons were fired a few hours earlier from Iran with US and Jordanian military assisting Israel’s air defenses in intercepting the first incoming barrage.

With weapons believed to be still in the air en route to Israel, Iran’s mission to the United Nations posted on X: “Iran’s military action was in response to the Zionist regime’s aggression against our diplomatic premises in Damascus. The matter can be deemed concluded.”

However, it threatened more severe action in the face of further Israeli aggression and warned the US and Jordan specifically not to assist Israel.

MBFC
Archive

Edit: here are links to the NYT and BBC live feeds.

Edit 2: updated summary and archive to reflect article changes.

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So, uh, are we doing World War 3 now? Just asking because I need to know if I should be canceling my summer plans and investing in canned food.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Inflight Emergency (IFE) declared via squawk 7700 for USAF tanker, now returning to al-Udeid from over Iraq (electrical).

    QUICK UPDATE:

    • Iran names the operation “The Promise of Truth.”

    • Israeli aircraft are positioned over western Iraq.

    • Interceptions have commenced over Jordan and Syria. A number of middle east Arab states announcing that they’ll knock down anything in their skies

    • Incidents of drones crashing in western Iraq have been reported.

    • Iranian media suggests that ballistic missiles will be launched from Iran in the early hours of the morning.

    • Airspace across the Middle East is closed

    • Al-Arabiya reports that British fighter jets are now involved in operation to interceptal Iranian drones launched against Israel

    • 6 p.m. ET Isreal should start to see missles, rockets and drones

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Netanyahu picked this fight, he should fight it himself. Otherwise its just encouraging other US allies to create chaos in bids for additional military support. Turkey is probably taking notes right now.

    • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Turkey is watching and taking notes about how the US supports full on genocide if you are Jew and doing it. If you are a Muslim or Turkish, the US will keep on supporting the local terror organizations like PKK through bordering YPG branch.

      Turkey is researching ways to become Jewish.

      Edit: Not just about the US but also the UK, France and Germany that oppresses protests against Israel’s genocide and arming Netanyahu with offensive weapons and using their own ships to defend against any retaliatory attacks. Turkey keeps thinking if her allies are the bad guys.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I know Israel is a small country of only 10M people with a traumatic history surrounded by enemies…so they need to act tough in their neighbourhood, take no shit and all…but they start to feel like the tiny angry girlfriend who dates a big guy and picks up fights in every bar expecting everyone to be afraid that her date will come to the rescue every time…

    • Jamil@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Israel is an apartheid. Stop falling for the Holocaust sympathy propaganda. The country is rotten to the core and doesn’t represent Jews.

      • Gsus4@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It is an open air prison, no doubt about that. Yet the apartheid in this case did not arise out of pure racism, but as a reaction to a history of constant suicide bombings. Besides, there are 2 million palestinian israelis living peacefully inside Israel…but there is also a part of Israel that does not help their case either by covering for every nationalist invading the West Bank or the cruelty they allow to go unpunished e.g. Shireen Abu Akleh.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Pretty sure isrealis were the first to bomb given that they were doing it before their country existed and then took terrorists as national heroes and military leaders.

          • Gsus4@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Ok… great … as if the problem wasn’t complex enough, there were/are? also crazy jewish bombers :/

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The point is, you stated the apartheid was a response to bombings, but Zionist terrorists were bombing and killing Palestinians before the Israeli state existed, and those terrorists were rewarded by the West and put into positions of power in Israel. After which there has been continued resistance by Palestinians.

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I personally wouldn’t have used mass murder and eviction to create an ethnostate aka Israel. Israel then has proceeded to annex more land against all treaties, blocks aid from entering Palestine and routinely murders Palestinian civilians. Are you saying Israel had no other options?

              • Gsus4@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yes, I agree it should not have been done, it is the UN’s original sin. But now it is there, survived lots of attacks from its beighbours, lots of jews were expelled from e.g. arab countries to shelter there, you just can’t go back.

                I’m asking what you would do if 20% of a country next to you kept trying to kill you (hamas wouldn’t even be happy with Palestinian statehood, they just want Israel wiped off the map).

                I’d “build a wall”, stop weapons going in and let them be until they calm down somehow…but that’s not what Israel did anyway…and hamas got over the fucking wall anyway, so here we are…back to 2007 again.

                • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  They didn’t just do that though, they funded Hamas, allowed them to recieve weapons, refuses to recognize any sort of Palestinian statehood, pursued policies that enabled the most extreme factions of Palestinian resistance and thwarts any attempt at lasting peace. There is a long-term plan in the works by Israeli forces to annex all of Palestine. Israeli officials from top to bottom have made it clear they want to eliminate Palestine as an idea.

                  What would you do if you were Palestinian?

            • Jamil@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Stop being an apartheid and have a truth and reconciliation process to correct the wrongs done to the Palestinians.

    • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Painting Israel as a victim just for having a small population / geography… I don’t know about that. They’ve committed far too many massscres since their inception to be portrayed like that.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        They were victims of the Holocaust. They were aggressors in the Nakba. They were probably victims one or more times after that, as well as aggressors (I’m a bit fuzzy on that history, honestly), and now they’re aggressors doing a “proportionate genocide” in Gaza. And they want to start shit with Iran, which might just be a case of two assholes fighting each other.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Stop giving in to the narrative that Israel equates to Jews. Jews suffered the Holocaust. Israel does not benefit from the suffering endured by a distinct group

        • beardown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Jews were victims of the Holocaust

          Zionists were aggressors in the Nakba

          Don’t conflate Judaism with Zionism

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yeah, but Zionism is a Jewish movement, and I doubt there were many Zionists who got through the Holocaust unscathed. It was the major motivating factor for actually doing it, so it is a big part of the picture.

            Signed, a (technically) Jewish anti-Zionist.

            • beardown@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Zionism is a Jewish movement

              It’s a movement that concerns followers of Judaism. But plenty of Zionists are Evangelicals etc. And Zionism has always had support from Non-Jews, dating back to its 19th century origins

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I actually don’t know much about the history of non-Jewish support, come to think of it. I should look into that.

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      but they start to feel like the tiny angry girlfriend who dates a big guy and picks up fights in every bar expecting everyone to be afraid that her date will come to the rescue every time…

      Lol, I called them US’s little Chihuahua dog that rabidly barks at any moving object

  • speaker_hat@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Iran government is a failing and trying to take down with it anything they can.

    They thought that only Israel will defend itself , but also the power of the USA, Jordan, France and more where there to defeat it’s evil attack.

    I hope for peace for everyone and the best of the Israeli and Iranian citizens.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      What was evil about Iran’s attack? It was in response to an attack on their territory, and only damaged military infrastructure with no deaths unlike every attack by Israel.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Weird world we’re in. One country retaliating against another, and for some reason the reaction of a country on the other side of the world is the news. If only biden gave half as much of a shit about his own country.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I heard about this on the radio while I was eating and thought “fuck yeah, big news, looking forward to reading about it online in a bit!”

    Totally forgot immediately and instead been looking at dank memes and making incendiary comments in posts about american political issues.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Iran has officially declared the start of the attack on Israel. “The evil regime will be punished,” its leader said.

    LOL! Iran calling someone else evil is really something. I’m eager to see where this round of fuck around and find out ends, since Israel is not known for forgivness. Only good thing I see at the moment is that Iran maybe has to stop supporting the russians to save equipment for their own stupid war.

    • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I didn’t realize that whenever you punched someone else and they punched back that’s fucking around and finding out.

      Israel started this, remember that.

      The stupid fucking British are involved.

      Everybody wants to kick off fucking World War III because Israel wanted to fucking destroy shit and then hide because they’re too tiny to do anything about it

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I know this is not the time for this typa comment, but I’m really annoyed that what I said last week is proven true

    Imma be completely honest and say that Iran probably won’t do anything except maybe throw some cruise missiles from afar that hit some random outpost or send a drone because they don’t want to risk anything.

    I’d love to see a competent air force take on the IAF, but I don’t think anyone in the middle east actually has one besides Israel and the USA’s own bases.

    This attack is over hyped and kinda lame. When India and Pakistan had beef in 2019, they had a whole ass air skirmish which ended with a captured pilot, fratricide’d helicopter, a crap ton of artillery barrages, and possibly a second aircraft shot down.

    Regardless of the poor reasoning behind it, at least they had the guts to fight each other properly.

    Iran is just sitting back and sending a swarm of drones that will probably fail to deal any damage proportional to their embassy attack, all the while escalating with Israel which gives both Israel and the USA a reason to send even more weapons and supplies and finish their job decimating Gaza.

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I am going to take the US perspective in all this and ask why they fuck are we even getting involved? They are half a world away. Why are Israel and Turkey? US allies? What have they done for us? Because it seems like we give them an awful lot and don’t get very much in return. The US should focus on defending the US and let Israel, Iran and all the rest of them have their part of the world with their conflicts. Just leave us the hell out of it.

    Edit: And we need to stay the hell out of their business and leave them the fuck alone to run their countries the way they want to.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You can’t be on top of the global trade and neglect strategic points that protect strategic trade routes. I mean, you can, but it will make USA shrink in global importance even faster. You leave, others fill the void, pay the price, reap the benefits. Isolationism isn’t likely to save the USA world dominance. Dominance which is the very biggest reason your currency is the most stable in the world: it’s backed by the biggest military apparatus ever, stop caring about the world, find out soon when your prices skyrocket and economy crashes. The real question is how the USA should behave in this, not if they should do a thing but rather what they should do.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Israel offers absolutely no unique strategic value to U.S. trade or military logistics. There are nearby NATO countries, bases in nearby allied countries as well as carriers in the Med that more than cover us.

        Israel is only a liability to us. They exacerbate tensions with our existing trade partners in the region and risk bringing us into unecessary conflicts.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          turkey has a strategic position towards the bosporus and russia, why they get away with a lot of bullshit too, israel is a more important as a reliable foot on the ground for guaranteeing the north end of the suez canal and the eastern end of the mediterranean. Cyprus also plays that role, but is also contested area greece/turkey. Never put all your eggs in one basket, that kind of thing. Carriers are nice but a always a risk (they might not seem so now, but you never know). Israel also offers an extra access point north side of the red sea, would the suez be unaccessible.

          I’m not at all saying the usa should just blindly follow israel on its warpath as it has been for many decades. They should try to get netanyahu towards the exit, sooner the better, but just leaving israel altogether is probably not in the best interest for the usa itself, long term geostrategically.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s the Middle East. It has a huge amount of a particularly important strategic resource. Additionally, the countries there generally have, at best, a cold relationship with the US. If not outright adversarial.

      Israel is smack dab in the middle of it with access to the sea. It holds a massively important strategic military and geopolitical position for the US.

      So, sure, what the other poster says is definitely part of it, but I think what primarily drives US support to be seemingly unequivocal is that the US/Israel alliance is also very important to US geopolitical influence as well.

      • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        As for that natural resource, we have quite a bit of it here in the United States itself. So we wouldn’t have to rely on them to get that resource. That, and if the US really wanted to break away, they could very seriously incentivize the purchase of electric mobility devices, such as electric bikes and scooters and cars.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The US is 10th on the list of oil reserves

          6 of those above the US are in the middle east (or northern Africa, depending on how you draw your boundaries). 5 of those have more than twice the amount of the US. One has probably around 5x. The US is burning through reserves right now, which is strategically a bad long term idea, IMO.

          I agree with you that certain dependance can go away if we shift to electric. However, militarily speaking, oil is going to be king probably for a long time. And that’s what this is about. Not just making sure civilians can drive down the road cheaply, although that certainly plays a role.

          • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            The US is a net exporter of oil. They don’t have a hard dependency on the list and it doesn’t matter if they’re 6th or 60th - they have more than they need.

          • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Israel is #91 on that same list. Israel consistently increases tensions with our trade partners in the region. They are a liability to our trade negotiations, not an asset.

          • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oil is crucial for agriculture and the production of vital chemicals and materials. We really shouldn’t be burning it.

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Gotta tell Ya’ll Qaeda that they’ll have to give up their trucks but they can keep plastic straws.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It has a huge amount of a particularly important strategic resource.

        This is not accurate. There are multiple nearby allied/NATO countries in the area as well as carrier groups in the Med that more than cover what Israel offers us.

        Israel does not offer us a unique strategic advantage in any scenario. They only increase tensions with our existing trade partners in the region and threaten to bring us into wars that they start. They are very much using us, and have been for decades. We allow/justify it because of religious and traditional reasons. Nothing more.

        Biden is backing Israel because some of the U.S.'s biggest political donors (AIPAC) will shift their support back to the Republicans in the upcoming election if he doesn’t. Mark my words: Biden will back off Israel support the instant it becomes too late for certain donors to negatively affect the upcoming election.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not looking to be antagonizing, as you’re correct those are the reasons. But it should be said that they are stupid reasons. We should be weaning off oil as quickly as possible. The second point is in a lot of ways a hindrance, as shipping zones means shipping away manufacturing jobs.

        And none of that is worth the price of war, or supporting genocide.

        • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not to mention that plenty of countries through the world are capable of engaging in maritime commerce with Middle Eastern countries without having military bases there.

          • irreticent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            To be fair, they enjoy that luxury due to the fact that the US Navy protects the shipping lanes.

    • shikitohno@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know about Turkey, but US politicians mostly care about Israel because AIPAC pumps a ton of money into US politics, both in the form of funneling it to pro-Israel candidates, and ads and campaign funding against those who don’t bow down to swear fealty to Israel.

      To a lesser extent, you also have a large chunk of fundamentalist Christians in the us who will support Israel no matter what because they believe Israel needs to exist as a nation with its full, Biblical territory, in order for Armageddon and the return of Jesus to occur. Just yet another way conservative Christians are trying to wreck the US for their insane beliefs.