Did not expect this woman to be in the first 40. She was all in on calling Palestine protestors Chinese and Russian plants.
Pelosi is also a reasonably savvy politician. Even if you look at her as a soulless political monster, she probably sees that American support of Israel has been steadily falling and the Israeli attack on aid workers may be the last straw for a lot of Americans. Therefore, it is imperitive to lay down political cover for Biden to halt military aid transfers to Israel.
Which they absolutely won’t do. But Biden is about to have a tense conversation with Netanyahu…. After which nothing will change
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Following the killing of seven World Central Kitchen workers by an Israeli strike while delivering food to Gaza earlier this week, House Democrats wrote a letter on Friday to U.S. President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken urging them to halt the the transfer of weapons to Israel until a full investigation into the airstrike was completed.
The letter, spearheaded by Reps. Mark Pocan, Jim McGovern and Jan Schakowsky, was signed by 40 lawmakers including Nancy Pelosi and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
“If this strike is found to have violated U.S. or international law, we urge you to continue withholding these transfers until those responsible are held accountable.
In a statement to Rolling Stone, a spokesperson for Pelosi said she is “sympathetic to some of the thoughts in the letter, and she feels very strongly that there must be a comprehensive, independent investigation into the horrific killing of the World Central Kitchen heroes,” adding, “Speaker Pelosi knows President Biden’s support for Israel and empathy with the innocent civilians in Gaza, and she respects his judgment in how to proceed.”
The letter also addressed reports that an estimated 32,000 people have been killed in Gaza since October 7, and that the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification initiative (IPC) recently warned that widespread famine is imminent and “expected to occur anytime between now and the next month if there is not an immediate cessation of hostilities.”
We again strongly urge you to withhold any offensive weapons transfers until the investigation into the airstrike is concluded and, if it is found this strike violated U.S. or international law, those responsible are held accountable,” the lawmakers emphasized.
The original article contains 503 words, the summary contains 270 words. Saved 46%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
AIPAC is losing its grip over the Democratic party.
That’s only true if there is any consequences. So far nothing has actually come about.
He means it used to be pure political suicide for anyone in congress to say a word about not funding and defending Israel no matter what war criminal shit they got up to, and now we have a Palestinian congresswoman who says stuff like “from the river to the sea” and no AIPAC-funded candidate has primaried her yet.
I’ll fully agree with you that it remains to be seen how much of that will turn into anything substantive the US decides to do to stop the killing, but the political landscape is definitely way way different than it used to be.
I’m guessing she just sold a bunch of Lockheed Martin stock
Hmmhmmm. Shorted that shit.
Call your reps and get them to join into to the demand
40 reps is not enough to make it happen
Particularly when they signed the funding bill,
Israel might have gone one step to far with the world central kitchen killings
José Andrés is one of the most loved people in DC regardless of politics. Fucking with his people is very bad, to put it mildly.
We’ll see if Biden actually cuts off weapons sales.
Narrator: He did not
Nance is in the right for once. Rare W for Nance.
Don’t be fooled by her. She’s a shark and she smells blood in the water.
After being called out on profiting off this genocide, she heroically attempted to repair optics around her
Wonder if lemmy’s pro-genocide centrists are gonna start calling Pelosi a Russian now.
Something on your mind? Guilty conscience?
You don’t know what a conscience is, genocide apologist.
Jerrrrr nerrr serrrrd
It’s like the only word you people know. Back in my day, trolls used to put in effort.
You would mock genocide.
#oneword
Which obfuscatory polite euphemism would you prefer I use?
Well, I would suggest you find something new pretty quickly, because things are changing with Israel. And I know you don’t actually care about Israel, you just want to attack Biden.
Nah they’ll claim Nancy is voting for Trump.
Looking over the comments I see absolutely no one that is pro genocide. Pretty much all the viewpoints are sensible: Unanimously anti-Israel, sometimes skeptically approving of Pelosi doing something good for once.
For what reason could you be painting the picture of an outlandish strawman view opposed to your own which doesn’t exist, I wonder
He’s clearly upset that people call him a “Russian”. It’s that simple.
My point is that his coming in here saying “genocide is bad!” is meeting with 0 resistance but instead full throated agreement from everybody, yet he’s still claiming there must be pro genocide people, I guess implying that is the only reason anyone could possibly disagree with him on other issues, or accuse him of being a Russian plant (*), is that they like genocide and for no factual well reasoned reason
(*) Or, more generally, dishonest; I have no idea if he’s Russian specifically or not
My point is that his coming in here saying “genocide is bad!” is meeting with 0 resistance
What unmitigated horseshit. You dare call me dishonest after posting this lie. I’ve attracted the attention of lemmy’s two most strident supporters of Netanyahu’s genocide. I don’t like mentioning downvotes, but you brought up resistance. Have a look at how many genocide loving centrists took personal offense at my speculation about Pelosi and downvoted me.
So then I said, you’re conflating someone disagreeing with you which lots of people do for valid reasons, with supporting genocide which pretty much no one on Lemmy does.
And then you said, how DARE you say no one supports genocide when so many people are disagreeing with me, which by definition means they’re pro genocide.
So then I said, you’re conflating someone disagreeing with you which lots of people do for valid reasons, with supporting genocide which pretty much no one on Lemmy does.
They don’t tell me their “valid reasons.” They just scream the usual garbage “Russian Chinese Tankie Republican child shill bot” shit that centrists say when they can’t actually argue their point.
What “valid reasons” are there to support the continued sales of weapons that are being used for genocide?
So then I said, dude no one’s actually supporting genocide
And then you said la la la, I can’t HEEAR you, they’re such bad unreasonable people all these people in the thread who love Israel’s war and want the weapons flow to continue, like look at the top 3 comments in this thread for example and see how not at all unanimous is the “genocide bad” consensus, that’s totally exactly why people are downvoting me is because they love love love genocide sooooo much
Wish it was my first day on lemmy too. Stick around, you’ll see them soon enough
Aaaand someone called her a Chinese asset in the comments here.
They’re mocking her earlier comments about protesters. I don’t read that as being a serious claim.
Looking over the comments I see absolutely no one that is pro genocide
I’ve successfully summoned two so far.
“Wonder if” are the first two words of my comment. I was speculating.
We’ll that’s interesting. She’s as mainstream as Democrats come. I was wondering a few days ago if Israel had had it’s Walter Cronkite moment with this strike. I guess I’ll be cautiously optimistic for a few days.
Walter Cronkite moment
Could you explain that to me?
https://mwi.westpoint.edu/war-public-opinion-myth-cronkite-moment/
Vietnam war, and Cronkite gave an editorial report that, ostensibly, shifted everyone’s opinion on said war.
Many thanks!
probably cuts in to her profit margins on the market somehow
Lol these people were sleeping till now because it was just a bunch of brown people getting murdered en-mass. The moment some white folk died they care.
Not just sleeping.
Pelosi herself accused protesters advocating for this exact thing of being “paid by Putin” back when it was “just” tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians and hundreds of Israel-critical journalists being murdered by the fascist apartheid regime…
Something must have affected her portfolio…
Probably because lord knows effecting her conscience isn’t the way to make her change course.
And then she changed her mind and picked a more moral position. Would you rather the letter that Pelosi signed help end the US arms transfer to Israel or not?
I’m not complaining about her changing her mind, I’m complaining that she didn’t do so 30k+ dead civilians ago and pointing out that her reasons probably have nothing to do with morality or listening to the people.
This is my favorite iteration of this meme ever 😄✊️
Fuck Israel.
Biden will do anything that doesn’t stop the flow of money to the MIC. I guess taking the money and then NOT giving them weapons is a loophole.
Are not all these weapon transfers laws that have already been voted on months and even years ago sometimes? Didn’t she probably vote for some of these?
Not quite that simple - authorization was voted on long ago in some cases but it’s up to the executive branch how and when to actually send them. They’re usually approved in big blocks which go out over time on no required-by-law schedule.
I think she probably voted for them back when being for Israel was a way to get votes, and now being for Israel is a way to lose votes, and now she’s alarmed and deeply concerned about the plight of the Palestinian people, all of a sudden. Whatever. If it leads to less support for Israel I’m at least happy that her insider trading ass is on the right side even if only very slightly and only by accident.
I also 100% agree with whoever it was that said call your representatives and encourage them to get on board too.
The laws include stopping transfers to anyone who the president determines to be interfering with [US] humanitarian aid.
This one of those “I’m going against it solely because I know opposing it at this point won’t do anything.”