• zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hate how the Bible is being used as a nationalist prop. Nationalism was a theme of the old testament and Jesus called his followers to move beyond national identity. But that’s how fascism works, it apropariates instead of actually creating something new.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would say we start the rumor that his Bible literally doesn’t match any others and contains Satanic verses, but that would probably increase sales. I wonder whose Bible he plagiarized.

    I wish he would die of sepsis from an infected hemorrhoid already.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It isn’t plagiarism unless he takes credit for it.

      So you might be right.

      This is the best book ever written. It’s tremendous. All the pastors tell me my writing style is the best. Number one seller of all time!

    • Hootz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just quote some “woke” passages and claim it’s not in the “real” bible and tell them that they should check themselves as that seems to make them believe basically anything.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wonder whose Bible he plagiarized.

      King James, who has been dead for almost 400 years. (Also, it’s public domain, so there’s that.)

    • … ya know, this theory feels like it may actually hold water. In an ancient society, it seems very feasible that a starving vagrant would employ stories about an omnipotent being that rewards acts of kindness with eternal heavenly glory.

      Is religion possibly the result of a diogenes persuading unemphatic peers into acting selflessly as a means of improving their quality of life?

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not a Diogenes for certain. He was a shit stirrer not a person trying to trick people into being good.

        But we do have a fair amount of realistic stories about the founding of one major religion that don’t require miracles to explain: Buddhism. And from the sounds of it Siddhartha Gautama was a member of the familial elite born to a life of luxury who was still not happy, he attempted asceticism as a means to fill the hole in his heart but found it too to be unfulfilling. Then he began developing a philosophical framework and set of techniques which sought to resolve the issue as he came to understand it, and when it helped he spread it. I believe he knowingly used metaphor that would’ve been understood by many of the people of his time and place as well as placing it within the religious framework of the Hindu society in which he lived.

        That doesn’t explain the earliest religions but for those I look to animism which just kinda makes a lot of sense to many people. It’s a natural consequence of applying empathy to all things. But Buddhism does explain how religion evolves from a framework with which to understand the world into a framework with which to understand oneself and to tell people how to act. We could also look at early Judaism which seems to be more rules for social harmony and for survival in a less than hospitable location.

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Buddhism also explains animism. Things aren’t separate from the mind that perceives them. The mind is alive. Thus, all perceived things are alive. This also explains non-violence and dana (selfless acts of giving). Being aggressive towards anything in our field of perception is to be aggressive to ourselves. To be giving to anything in our field of perception is to give to ourselves.

          Took Buddhism plus DMT to actually grok that, though.

  • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    but the bible isn’t copyrighted? right? Is there any other aspect than just the economic abuse of religions trump fans?

      • ZephrC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the question here is how is this money laundering? I could sell Sherlock Holmes for $60, and that wouldn’t be Arthur Conan Doyle giving me money under the table. How is this any different?

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s laundering because when someone is expressly forbidden to give you money and you start to sell them snow in the winter that’s what is called giving you money. And the cheaper you get stuff to sell the less you pay to clean up the funds

          • ZephrC@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Is there any evidence of churches buying these stupid bibles? If there is that’s a pretty serious accusation. If it’s just weirdo Trump cultists then that’s not actually money laundering.

            • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Serious accusation? Please. Trump does six financial crimes worse than this one every morning before his breakfast burger. All we’re saying is we can see the grift.

              • ZephrC@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Just because he does worse things all the time doesn’t mean this isn’t serious. Don’t let him move the goalpost like that. But also maybe have some actual evidence instead of just paranoid conspiracy theories. That’s their thing. We need to be better than them.

                • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Again I guess I haven’t explained properly.

                  I am not accusing him of a specific crime.

                  I am saying: look, he’s selling bibles, which will allow terrible churches to support his cause without falling foul of campaign finance law.

                  There’s no evidence because technically there’s no crime. He’s just found a new way to rip the system off.

                  Also: I don’t have access to Trump’s Bible sale records. Never will. Nor will you Does that mean we shouldn’t say anything about the fact that he’s cheating the electoral system? That right-wing churches can advance their power grabs without fear of prosecution? Even if it’s not illegal it’s unjust and dangerous.

            • nomous@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Hey I’m sure Trump will release the sales records right?

              Right after he tells us who’s buying up all the shares of Trump Media & Technology Group that just went public but just BEFORE he releases his taxes.

              I’m all for giving the benefit of the doubt inititally but those days are long long past. He’s definitely using this to funnel money into his campaign.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You’re right, if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt it’s Donald Trump and Evangelical Christians.

    • Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This is like buying merch from a YouTuber. It’s not about buying a product for what it’s worth, it’s about donating to a “cause” with something to show off that you did. (Not hating on supporting YouTubers, just a comparison)

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Scared, stupid and selfish. The 3S framework of conservatism. You don’t have to be all 3 to be conservative, but you’re at least one.

      • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nice, I’d say the first two of those terms apply mostly to the dumb ones.

        The disingenuous ones take advantage of the stupidity of the others to induce fear to facilitate manipulation.

      • LordCrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        All politicians have books…a single person is free to buy 10,000 copies, book seller gets a cut and politicians get the rest… 100% legal, clean profit. And the person that bought 10k copies gets access to said politicians

    • Human Penguin@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Its def a way around church funding. But a legal one. So the use of laundering weakens the complaint.

      The only potential legal question. Is are churches buying the bible or openly encouraging memembers to. And let’s be honest. That tax dodge is totally ignored by the IRS for so long. I can see it getting challenged as unequal application of law. Unless the IRS dose some major attack on most churches.

      Edit; odd autocorrect. Nuking vs buying.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s a loophole grift for everyone!

    A Super PAC for all your greenback “free speech”!

    Limited Edition shoes for scalpers and people who like collecting shiny shit!

    NFTs to offload your crypto wallets!

    Truth Social to legally funnel Wall Street money through holding companies!

    Bibles for churches to spend money while saying they are “updating their library”.

    Come one come all, ye shady source of funding!