• Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    So you’re supposed to sit on the homeless person as if they were some piece of cloth?

    Ok.

    • gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because as we all know, without dividers every bench in the city would have a homeless person sleeping on it 24 hours a day non-stop, never allowing anyone to sit down ever again.

      • Crampon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        No they won’t. They will only sleep there the exact moment someone with a disability isn’t nearby. They can sense people in need. So they wake up and leave the premises. Right?

        This comment section is literally insane.

        • colon_capital_D@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Damn, you hate homeless people so much, you’re using pregnancy and disabled people as an excuse. Just say you don’t like homeless people, it’s easier

          • Crampon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Incredible cognitive decay. Case study right here. Weaponized degenerative genes.

            I actually believe in housing the homeless. And making sure infrastructure is available with bare minimum annoyance to the average person.

            I live in a country often praised by leftist ideologist in the US. You eat posts like this as cocaine glazed meth.

            You are not able to carry two thoughts at the same time. Pure fuel for the conservatists in your country.

            • gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Dawg, slow down for a minute.

              In your first comment, you say the extra armrests are there to keep “some homeless” (not even a homeless PERSON) off the bench for disabled individuals. You’re saying that benches should have these installed because seating disabled people is more important than letting “some homeless” use it for a night’s rest.

              When others point out that a bench with armrests at the ends and no dividers could be used by both groups, you say “bUt YoU hAvE tO SiT oN tHe hOmELeSs” as if 2 people can’t use a bench at the same time. It’s a bench, not a chair, that’s the whole point. What are you even arguing here, that if homeless people are allowed to use benches that they’ll all be occupied, and they all will refuse to move, and we’ll have to sit on the unhoused? Absolutely preposterous.

              And then, when all this is pointed out to you, you say the rest of us have “degenerative” genes and can’t hold 2 thoughts at the same time. Really? That’s straight up far right rhetoric, bringing up the inferior genes shit.

              Yes, unhoused people should absolutely have a place to go, but we don’t need to build our cities to be hostile towards them.

              TLDR: Go the fuck outside, get some help, go for a walk, call your mom, hell, even go talk to a homeless person, touch grass. I’m done with Lemmy for today, you should be too.

              • Crampon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                You are the one believing removing arm rests will solve the homless’ issue.

                You can actually have the arm rests there while still housing the homeless.

                Go re-elect your fascist president with your insane “leftist” views. You are fueling the whole machine with that cognitive dissonance.