• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That’s their excuse.

    Better be an opt-in feature instead of an opt-out, because I’m tired of needing to turn off new ‘features’ I don’t need that are said to be for something that sounds kind of reasonable but ends up being because they want to track more things and have more control over you.

    • lowleveldata@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ya I don’t like the idea either. But what really grinds my gears is that misleading headline that makes it sounds like they are doing it suddenly with no apparent reasons.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I prefer neutral headlines that don’t promote what is likely to be a lie without the context of the article.

        They say it is for finding lost phones, but I don’t really believe that is the actual reason. They are probably doing some kind of tracking that uses bluetooth and too many people are turning it off for their preferences.

        • lowleveldata@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Let the reader be the judge. You can be neutral without hiding information. How about “Android 15 can turn Bluetooth on automatically and Google says it’s for finding lost devices”?

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            and Google says

            That would be acceptable, but headlines are rarely written that way because of the added length.