• dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I never thought I’d see the day when a respectable blue chip company like Boeing is publicly outed as ordering an assassination. They fucked up royally. The timing of it all is too eyebrow raising not to be noticed by the entirety of the airplane-using world. Top down criminal investigation. Now.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I never thought I’d see the day when a respectable blue chip company like Boeing is publicly outed as ordering an assassination.

      Why does this surprise you that a company, a large company, would order an assassination someone? This doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.

    • exanime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      well your first mistake was thinking Boeing was a respectable corporation (that ship sailed in 1997 when they dropped the “engineering first” priority in lieu of “business first”)…

      your second mistake is thinking any corporation is respectable ;-)

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Their third mistake is thinking any corporation will be held accountable

        • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Oh, you got caught doing some shitty business thing and now you’re not making as much money. Here is a government bailout to make it up.

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        lol you’re right.

        In other news, if you search for flights on kayak and exclude Boeing planes, holy crap the tickets are insanely expensive.

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          next stops: buy Kayak and shut it down; Make it illegal for similar searches to be performed; make it illegal to disclose who makes the aircraft.

          Unless citizens make it clear that they won’t stand for bullshit, they will get bullshit.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Scary thing nobodies talking about is: if these Boeing-built bad parts are able to slip past inspectors, which we had (naievely?) assumed were given full access top-notch, and neutral, might the standards of other planes build-quality have also dropped?

          How safe are the other company’s planes?

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      At the end of which some low level schmuck will be thrown under the bus and they will be fined a few million dollars grand total for all this shit.

    • Nobody@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Boeing is a major part of the military industrial complex. They own the politicians in both parties, the regulators, and the courts. Laws don’t apply to them.

      • skulblaka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If they can’t deliver a product that stays in one piece when not even being shot at, they aren’t about to stay a part of that MIC for long.

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you’re the government, you want your military planes to work. It’s in their interests. (Now there’s lots of steps that are problems in realizing that.)

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          No. If you’re the state you want shit to work. If you’re part of the government, you just want to get your bribes.

        • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean there may simply have been internal reports already, just highly classified to avoid “embarrassing” the nation and not accessible or known to the general public.

          • Kalysta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I feel like “risk of door blowing off mid flight” or “25% of oxygen masks don’t work” is something the public is entitled to know about

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            “Look, it turns out if you flip this switch on the Fa-18 and forget to turn it off after 1 to 5 minutes tops, your chances of ‘uncontrollably inverting and ejecting at high speed straight into the freaking ground’ go up tenfold. We’ve provided the USAF with a 1 hour iPad training about being touchy with the defrost function.”

            –Boeing, probably

      • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Murdering people has been a normal part of corporations for a long time, but they generally do it to union organizers in the developing world.

      • Morgoon@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        In America it used to be you could just bribe your governor and they’d deploy the national guard to kill striking worker’s families like the Ludlow Massacre and the Battle of Blair mountain.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ludlow Massacre and the Battle of Blair mountain.

          It blows my mind how blatantly these events are not taught to anybody. Never forget.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, there have been several huge instances of mass murder by corporations. Go look into the US’ history with strikebreaking and you’ll see just how bad it used to be. At least Boeing is trying to pretend it was a suicide, instead of just blatantly firebombing him in his own home.

  • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Im having trouble opening this article, it says something about a “client side error” but in text that is almost that same color as the background and is hard to read. Anyone else having this or know how I can fix it?

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      abcnews4.com ‘If anything happens, it’s not suicide’: Boeing whistleblower’s prediction before death Anne Emerson 3–4 minutes

      John Barnett’s family friend Jennifer doesn’t think the Boeing whistleblower committed suicide in Charleston. In fact, she says he predicted what may happen to him days before he left for his deposition. March 14, 2024. (Provided-FILE, WCIV)

      CHARLESTON COUNTY, S.C. (WCIV) — A close family friend of John Barnett said he predicted he might wind up dead and that a story could surface that he killed himself.

      But at the time, he told her not to believe it.

      “I know that he did not commit suicide,” said Jennifer, a friend of Barnett’s. “There’s no way.”

      Jennifer said they talked about this exact scenario playing out. However, now, his words seem like a premonition he told her directly not to believe.

      “I know John because his mom and my mom are best friends,” Jennifer said. “Over the years, get-togethers, birthdays, celebrations and whatnot. We’ve all got together and talked.”

      READ MORE: “Mystery lingers around Boeing whistleblower’s death at Charleston hotel.”

      When Jennifer needed help one day, Barnett came by to see her. They talked about his upcoming deposition in Charleston. Jennifer knew Barnett filed an extremely damaging complaint against Boeing. He said the aerospace giant retaliated against him when he blew the whistle on unsafe practices.

      For more than 30 years, he was a quality manager. He’d recently retired and moved back to Louisiana to look after his mom.

      “He wasn’t concerned about safety because I asked him,” Jennifer said. “I said, ‘Aren’t you scared?’ And he said, ‘No, I ain’t scared, but if anything happens to me, it’s not suicide.’”

      Jennifer added: “I know that he did not commit suicide. There’s no way. He loved life too much. He loved his family too much. He loved his brothers too much to put them through what they’re going through right now.”

      Jennifer said she thinks somebody “didn’t like what he had to say” and wanted to “shut him up” without it coming back to anyone.

      READ MORE: “‘John was brave’: Boeing whistleblower’s lawyer responds to news of his death.”

      “That’s why they made it look like a suicide,” Jennifer said.

      The last time Jennifer saw Barnett was at her father’s funeral in late February. He was one of the pallbearers. Sometimes family and friends referred to him by his middle name – Mitch.

      “I think everybody is in disbelief and can’t believe it,” Jennifer said. “I don’t care what they say, I know that Mitch didn’t do that.”

      Just because Barnett is dead doesn’t mean the case won’t move forward.

      His attorney said they’re still prepared to go to trial in June.

      News 4 reached out to Boeing following Barnett’s death. They provided the following statement:

      "We are saddened by Mr. Barnett’s passing, and our thoughts are with his family and friends.”

      READ MORE: “Boeing whistleblower dies in Charleston, Charleston County Coroner’s Office confirms.”

    • RatBin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can’t get past the cookie notice and the phone - which is what I’m using now - is stuttering. Had to close the page.

  • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    when a whistleblower dies on the day of his deposition, you have to work really hard to convince me that it’s suicide.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        “We appreciate your candor and willingness to see the truth outed. As such, we hope your family will join you on a lovely vacation, with a complimentary flight on a 737 max.”

        “Well shit, they’ve got me by the balls now”

    • GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Definitely! But a ‘friend of the family’ is not really a perfect source.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just saying, I bet Boeings lied more about things that caused humans to die than the friend of the family has so if its he said she said, I think she’s got the superior credibility. She just doesn’t have superior profits.

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t know whether or not he killed himself, and I strongly suspect he didn’t, but I sure as hell know this warrants an intense and thorough investigation. All company and private emails of executives, with forensics to determine if anything was deleted. Long interrogations to see if alibis match up.

    There isn’t enough evidence to throw the book at Boeing, but there is enough to search every single little thing related to them.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There isn’t enough evidence to throw the book at Boeing, but there is enough to search every single little thing related to them.

      What am I missing? What evidence is there at all that they did it? Don’t get me wrong, I’m certainly highly suspicious that they were involved, but you have to have a lot more than suspicion.

      • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        His death, under suspicious circumstances, objectively benefits Boeing in an ongoing criminal investigation.

        That seems like sufficient justification to conduct an investigation.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          His death, under suspicious circumstances, objectively benefits Boeing in an ongoing criminal investigation.

          This is motive, not evidence.

          That seems like sufficient justification to conduct an investigation.

          The fact that he has died is sufficient justification to conduct an investigation, and I’m sure they will. But the claim was that they have enough evidence against Boeing to subpoena basically everything they have. And Boeing having a motive to kill someone is not evidence that they did it, and would not pass a judge if anyone were to seek some kind of warrant.

          • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not sure why you’re being down voted, what you are saying is accurate. I guess the others are of the “Boeing is bad, therefore it’s pitchfork time” mindset and not justice and due process.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yup, that’s lemmy for you. The facts don’t matter, only the narrative.

              • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                “Yup, that’s $blank for you.”

                Same shit’s been said ever since the caveman developed complex enough language to say. That’s a lazy, tired, and vacuous trope you’re mindlessly spouting there, tiger.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s important to remember that whistleblowing is extremely stressful, so much that it’s one of the main things the government talks about on their whistleblowing site:

    Practice self-care and stress-reducing activities throughout your whistleblowing process. It is common to experience toxic forms of retaliation – from professional isolation to gaslighting (manipulating someone by psychological means into questioning their own sanity) – which can lead to post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, or even thoughts of harm.

    https://whistleblower.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/whistleblower.house.gov/files/whistleblower_survival_tips.pdf

    Researchers have found the same thing, being a whistleblower is terrible for your mental health:

    About 85% suffered from severe to very severe anxiety, depression, interpersonal sensitivity and distrust, agoraphobia symptoms, and/or sleeping problems, and 48% reached clinical levels of these specific mental health problems. These specific mental health problems were much more prevalent than among the general population.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604402/

    In addition, “Half of Patients With Suicidal Thoughts Deny It”

    Not only did approximately 50% of people with suicidal thoughts deny having those thoughts, roughly 50% of people who had died by suicide, and 30% of people who had attempted suicide had denied having suicidal ideation in the week or month beforehand.

    Furthermore, in many cases, people who had disclosed in apps and on paper that they had thoughts of suicide then denied that they had suicidal ideation when questioned directly in face-to-face assessments or interviews. For example, in one study, nearly 60% of those who reported their suicidal ideation on an app then denied their suicidal ideation in a telephone interview less than 24 hours later.

    https://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.pn.2021.10.9

    So, just because he denied he was suicidal doesn’t mean that’s necessarily true. He might have been trying to appear strong to everyone while suffering in silence.

    This should definitely be investigated as possibly being murder. And, even if the investigation does determine that he shot himself, they should keep looking to see if he was being blackmailed or if he might have been pressured into suicide.

    I just can’t imagine an executive at Boeing going out and hiring a hit man. But, what I can imagine them doing is hiring a team of private investigators to go through this guy’s entire life and dig up every bit of dirt on him. It could be they found something really embarrassing and were going to blackmail him with it. It could be that they found something innocent that they could frame as being awful, like to make him look like he was a child molester or something.

    • experbia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I just can’t imagine an executive at Boeing going out and hiring a hit man

      Really? That’s weird, I totally can. It’s an exceptionally narrow-minded and short-sighted knee-jerk reaction to a perceived threat of one’s executive career. Most coked-out executives already have a massive god complex once they get their MBA and are installed above the proles workers. I can absolutely realistically imagine one Boeing executive getting angry enough and coked-out enough to just decide, “fuck it, I’m going to fix this problem for us before he threatens my career and reputation any more”.

      The information you present about whistleblowing being stressful is fair. He may indeed have been driven to kill himself instead of being straight-up assassinated like others believe. I refuse, however, to give the benefit of doubt to a massive corporation who has already demonstrated a complete lack of regard for human life and an extremely poor track record of moral and ethical decision-making. This needs to be investigated under the assumption that a hit is an entirely possible reality. Unless you’d rather that nobody blows the whistle on anything in the future - you’ve already demonstrated that it’s an incredibly stressful action. If there’s the lingering remote possibility that you can be simply assassinated over it and everyone will look the other way, nobody will ever raise their voice again. The nature of his actions before his death demand a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation into if any person from Boeing had anything to do with it whatsoever, or whistleblowing will continue sliding into something only the insane consider.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Really? That’s weird, I totally can.

        While Boeing executives may be criminals, they’re pretty much exclusively white collar criminals. They went to business school, not the military. They come from rich households. They don’t have gang or organized crime affiliations. How would they know anything about hiring hit men?

        Hiring a firm to do PR and to dig up dirt on a whistleblower, sure, that’s within their skillset. That’s even something they can brag about in board meetings because it’s legal. It’s the kind of thing they can google, or have a secretary research for them. It doesn’t matter if transcripts leak. But, hiring a hit man, how do they know they won’t get caught – and this time for the kind of crime where people actually get sent to real prisons?

        This needs to be investigated under the assumption that a hit is an entirely possible reality.

        Sure, they should work under the assumption that it was a very careful hitman who made it look like a suicide. They should be 10x more careful than they normally would if they even suspected it might be a suicide. But, I still think driving him to suicide is much more likely.

        IMO, the kind of press this is getting is part of the reason I don’t think it was a hit. If this were Russia, sure. A hit sends the message to anybody else that they better not think of doing the same thing. The press will tell whatever story the government wants. Even on social media nobody very few people will speak up in Russia. But, in the US, this death is going to draw so much more attention to Boeing. Just look at how many articles there are about the whistleblower’s death vs. how many there were about him beforehand. Corporations are used to managing news cycles when it comes to legal cases and congressional hearings. Those are boring and don’t tend to go viral. But a whistleblower dying as he was giving testimony, that’s exciting, it’s like the movies, so it’s all everyone’s going to talk about.

        Unless he had even more damaging information that he somehow didn’t give to anybody yet, despite the fact he had already been testifying, it seems like the damage his death does is much higher than the damage his testimony would have done.

        • ysjet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Frankly speaking, whether or not a hitman was hired, Boeing is culpable.

          Organizing a concerted effort to drive someone to suicide is just as illegal as murdering them. End of story.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            If there’s evidence they organized a concerted effort to drive someone to suicide, definitely. Otherwise they’re just culpable for gross violations of safety that have cost lives of airline passengers.

        • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          But, in the US, this death is going to draw so much more attention to Boeing.

          Attention sure, nothing will happen to Boeing though. They own too many politicians, and too many powerful people need them to stay where they are. I have no doubt they killed him.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Attention sure, nothing will happen to Boeing though.

            There’s more of a chance of something happening now than there was before the whistleblower died.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You didn’t think executives would resort to violence?

          Let me introduce you to Coca Cola and Shell. And the East and West India Companies before them.

          These guys approved MCAS knowing it could create situations that were were unrecoverable. They aren’t above killing people for profit.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          While Boeing executives may be criminals, they’re pretty much exclusively white collar criminals. They went to business school, not the military. They come from rich households. They don’t have gang or organized crime affiliations. How would they know anything about hiring hit men?

          Someone has never seen the first RoboCop movie.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s maybe an absurd theory no one has considered: He worried that the accusations weren’t going to be taken seriously, so he killed himself in a relatively suspicious manner/timing, to make sure public trust in Boeing disappeared.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It seems unlikely because there was a lot of interest in the stuff he was testifying about, but it’s possible.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hey look! Boeing just gave the Biden Admin a HUGE W! All they have to do is investigate and punish the people at the top!

    Whoops! Nevermind! I guess we’ll just continue saying we AREN’T Trump!

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Are you under the impression that the evidence would point to murder but the government wouldn’t investigate that? Obviously it will be investigated. The “people at the top” would be prosecuted if there was evidence they were involved, and not prosecuted if there is no evidence. That is what we want from the government.

      You can’t read one headline, assume you know exactly who did exactly what illegal thing, and then immediately declare conspiracy because the evidence doesn’t currently prove your made up claims.

  • Thann@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    if theyre killing witnesses, theyre too big to prosecute, and I think they should be shutdown and sold for parts

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I would be going to pretty great lengths to ensure I didn’t get Epsteined or, if I did, the mfers behind it got theirs. I’d be sending hand written letters to every goddamn person knew that I wasn’t suicidal.

      And I would be really careful about my opsec. Oh, you thought I was at that motel? Fuck you pricks, I ditched the rental, took a bus and switched five times, changed clothes twice and snuck to a culvert to sleep, you fucking corpo assassins. Good luck with that. .!..

    • dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I know right. Exactly my thoughts. If you are a whistleblower, install secret camers in your house and always keep a recorder (audio/video) in your pocket or chest.

      Although in a few years this is obsolete. AI ftw.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      And mentioning on social media so it’s public/informing journalists so they can make it public beforehand that you don’t plan on killing yourself.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The trouble with that is someone might say you DID plan to kill yourself, and tried to frame Boeing for your own death by telling people you weren’t suicidal. Thus it’s preferable to leave video evidence, that could also help catch the culprits.

        It still leaves the possibility that you yourself hired a hit squad to kill you. Alex Murdaugh and Jussie Smollett both did things like that. Only for a beating in Smollett’s case, but Murdaugh actually wanted to be fatally shot, leaving an insurance policy behind.

    • juicy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Or always stay in sight of two other people and eat and drink only from sealed packages purchased from random grocery stores.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      If you want, take a deeper look into the *max events and you’ll find that being dirty is the least surprise.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Friendly reminder that Boeing is not a plucky airline that can’t make safe airplanes, it’s an AMERICAN MILITARY DEFENSE CONTRACTOR worth billions. If I you threaten that arrangement with slander like the truth and facts, they are good friends with people who kill for a living and completely unashamed in paying for their services.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Put another way: there are plenty of people who will eagerly issue death threats, stalk you, and swat you over minor differences in opinion. Think what they would do over serious money.

      • voluble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        it’s an AMERICAN MILITARY DEFENSE CONTRACTOR worth billions

        Probably one reason why the FAA isn’t immediately shutting Boeing’s shit down, you know when doors fall off their planes mid-flight, and investigations uncover more problems.

    • anomoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not any defender of corporations, by any means, but I’m not sure that I’m willing to take the word of a “close family friend” who “needed help one day” any more than some corporate HR; and “I don’t care what they say, I know that Mitch didn’t do that” isn’t exactly a solid argument to be basing things on.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        This isn’t “I know Mitch didn’t do that”, it’s “he literally told me the specific thing that happened and he wasn’t going to do it”. What motivation does she have to just fully make up a conversation? Boeing has billions of dollars of motivation, she knew him from family get togethers.

        • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          My pet theory: Some extra dirty psycho at Boeing probably had him killed. Probably to cover up specifics about themselves. It seems pretty clear Boeing is rotting at the head and has been for decades. All these issues that have come up since MAX are the result of deeply systemic problems, stemming from crooked, greedy psychopaths at the top.

          But in the interests of being as rational and honest about this as possible, let’s also not forget that this article is based on her claim, and she’s the only one (so far) to make it. People have been known to seek attention with bullshit. It’s evidence, yeah, is it really unimpeachable? Well…

          Think about it like this: if there was a dated and notarized statement in his handwriting saying the same thing that she claims he told her, that would be more trustworthy.

          But again, pet theory, some Boeing sicko was covering their own ass by having him Epsteined. Totally plausible.

          I don’t think this is the last we will be hearing about this.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Amazing how standards of evidence work. I am a Jesus Mythicist and pretty much all we have to “prove” Jesus was real is one guy saying he meet some unnamed person who had a dream. But here we have a direct eyewitness stating what they heard a week ago and that isn’t good enough.

        • anomoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          What motivation does she have to just fully make up a conversation?

          That’s my point: we have no idea. We have no information other than that her and Barnett’s mothers are best friends and that he was a pallbearer at her father’s funeral. She could be a well educated individual that is doing her best to make a point and draw attention to something, or she could be someone who believes tons of stuff that is blatantly false and is telling her opinion to anyone who will listen. Either way, (copying from my other comment) I guess this is all more me just trying to voice frustration with the article. Not that it’s unprecedented (maybe even the norm) these days, but it’s always frustrating to see headlines with unsubstantiated claims and discussions ensuing as if it’s fact."

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            There is literally no other corroboration that could be given, it’s a personal conversation between friends or friendly acquaintances, reported as such. There’s nothing wrong with the article. This is the maximum amount of corroboration for a private conversation (none) and it’s reported as a conversation, with information about the speaker’s relationship and direct quotes. Just because people don’t record their lives in unalterable write-once media doesn’t mean personal conversations simply should never be the subject of reporting. We have headline news stories about US generals’ personal conversations with Trump and his denials, and no one thinks “well, that shouldn’t be reported because either side could be lying and without recording they’re both equally suspicious”.

            I’m certain you don’t actually follow a philosophy of “nothing anyone says can ever be given any more credence than anyone else” because it’s an impossible way to live. And whatever high-minded “no one can ever know absolute truth” ideas you have, claiming that a HR rep and a family friend have the same level of believability is ridiculous. On one side you someone whose job is literally to say things to protect a billion dollar company and the other a family friend with nothing to gain talking about a pretty reasonable conversation one might have.

        • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          There’s a few accounts on these threads that are really determined to remain neutral and open minded about Boeing, I blocked a different one with the same speech pattern recently

          • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Remaining open minded, waiting for evidence… Must be ChatGPT because that’s not a human thing, never had been!

            I am a Lemmy language user and I have processed this request.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Remaining open minded, waiting for evidence…

              You wrote “being willfully ignorant” wrong

          • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Well, I for one think some rogue at Boeing is behind the Epsteining of this guy. The company is definitely run by psychopathic crooks and has been for a while and I hope these fuckers all go to jail and the company fixed before more people die.

            Idk about these accounts you blocked… but I am always going to advocate for at least being self-aware of being loosey-goosey with one’s reasoning. Maybe it is compulsion, maybe it is the decades wasted being religious that have led me to detest careless epistemology that leads to specious conclusions. Then again … if COVID taught me nothing, it should have taught me that efforts in this area are probably pointless. I must like swimming upstream. I seem to do it all the time.

      • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        And he said, ‘No, I ain’t scared, but if anything happens to me, it’s not suicide.’

        He pretty much said “I think something may happen to me and they will make it look like a suicide.”

        Unless she’s got a recording or document, the article’s title could have been, “Family friend tells reporter a story”

        Yeah, it won’t hold up in court, and neither would it if she had recorded this casual, intimate conversation between two old friends.

        Maybe, though, it’s enough to get the coroner to take another look at his death.

        I’m not any defender of corporations, by any means, but I’m not sure that I’m willing to take the word of a “close family friend” who “needed help one day” any more than some corporate HR;

        You sure have a lot more faith in corporations than I do…

        • anomoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          He pretty much said “I think something may happen to me and they will make it look like a suicide.”

          Did he state that somewhere else? Admittedly I haven’t been following the story too closely so I may have missed something there; but if he isn’t documented saying that somewhere credible, then all we have is her claiming that he “pretty much said” that. Is it likely he said it? I mean, I’d definitely be saying it if I was in his shoes, but one family friend’s claim isn’t enough to convince me that this should have been published as it was. I guess this is all more me just trying to voice frustration with the article. Not that it’s unprecedented (maybe even the norm) these days, but it’s always frustrating to see headlines with unsubstantiated claims and discussions ensuing as if it’s fact.

          Maybe, though, it’s enough to get the coroner to take another look at his death.

          Here’s to hoping

          You sure have a lot more faith in corporations than I do…

          I probably don’t, I’m just trying to present an argument with throwing on more layers of personal bias

        • HighElfMage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Maybe, though, it’s enough to get the coroner to take another look at his death.

          He’s a high profile corporate whistleblower who allegedly committed suicide. Any coroner who isn’t already triple checking everything is way too corrupt or lazy to bother with another look.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            The coroner is going to call it as suicide. This isn’t remotely a debate to me. If it is suicide it goes away. If it is murder it means work for the police and a small annoyance to the powers-that-be. The coroner knows this and knows that if they don’t writer suicide their career is over at best at worst they get Epsteined as well.

        • anomoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m curious if some one who disagreed with you - on something that they found completely, obviously true - tried to convince you they were right by saying that their mom’s friend’s daughter made a claim about it, how inclined would you be to believe them or that daughter?

          I think we all agree that Barnett suspected that something would happen; and we all agree that Boeing is a terrible company that is capable, and guilty, of terrible things. My point it just that there is concrete evidence of these things and articles should rely on something other than some person made a claim with nothing but, “it’s obvious” or “I know” to back it up

        • anomoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I feel the same about the response given that I’m agreeing with everyone’s sentiments overall and only questioning the validity of a single source. Suppose I need to get a better feel for the site before trying to be more active.

          • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Naw, you’re good. Change nothing about yourself. :) You are spot on and you have my upvotes.

            Folks are in angry mob mode and can’t be bothered with even a hint of nuance or reason, apparently. Even if you are convinced Boeing totally killed the guy and state that clearly…

            Anyway, peace out man. I hope for once corporate scum faces consequences.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do you have any fuckdamn idea how many innocent people died by the command of American fruit companies?

      Capitalism feeds on blood, it always has.

        • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          They literally overthrew democratic governments just to install their own puppets.

          A fucking FRUIT company.

          And you’re right, they just kept going like nothing happened.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Boeing is that dirty? Surely not?

      Why not?

      International profit chasing entities just wouldn’t value profits over human life?

      • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is a corporations fiduciary responsibility to maximize profits over any other things. That obviously includes human lives.

        Does a human life have a value to other humans? Yes.

        Does a human have a value to a corporation? It has a value and a cost, if the cost is higher than the value of the human then it is a risk to the value of the company and can be liquidated.

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Like really…Boeing is that dirty? Surely not?

      I mean they were willing to knowingly keep producing unsafe air planes which lead to several crashes killing 100’s. So yeah, I really wouldn’t be surprised if they also do assassination to ensure their profit.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Also as stated elsewhere, they make world ending nuclear bombs delivery rockets. They’ve profited from the possible destruction of all of humanity.

      • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        pro tip: real suicides generally don’t include a note

        The rate in the graph varies between 20 and 40 percent.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        And after they find out the suicide note… was written super-generically.

        To whom it may concern,

        I cannot take it anymore. If I have a wife and/or kids, tell them that I love them.

        Good bye cruel world,

        [Don’t forget to change this text to the assassinated target’s name]

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Go further, nationalize the MIC. I’m not gonna sit here and pretend the United States doesn’t need to manufacture arms for itself and it’s allies, but we absolutely do not need thousands of useless C-suite middlemen making millions of dollars from the process. Boeing is just the canary in the coal mine, I would not be surprised if other frequent contractors have also significantly decreased their ability to produce useful goods in favor of growing their profit margins. Great for profits, but not exactly what you’re looking for to protect troops.

    • fustigation769curtain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Seriously. Once we nationalize it and it starts operating like it used to, it would be a shining example of why nationalization works.

      It’s also why you’re going to see an tsunami of useful idiots saying we shouldn’t do it.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Then flush everyone from director up, and investigate middle management, and put people in that actually have some fucking ethics. Jesus H Christ.