• AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s a pretty commonly used format on many parts of the internet, I think most people would interpret it that way, especially when everybody reading will see that what is being quoted is obviously untrue.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Well I guess I’m being nuanced here, but I don’t think in this specific case that works out that way, considering what it’s replying to.

      In other words I would agree with your interpretation if the reply was parodying something I said directly. Otherwise it just seems something of a non sequitur.

      Anyway, I get what you’re trying to communicate towards me, I even agree that sometimes it is using the way you describe. I would just think that’s done the minority of the time, and the majority of the time quotes are used to actually quote someone.

      • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I felt like “/s” gives the “joke” away so I opted not to have it and have people actually think critically, especially since the statement is false.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think if it was intended to quote someone they would put who they were quoting. Otherwise there’s not really a point.