redcalcium@lemmy.institute to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoTIL you can improve your google search result by adding "before:2023"mastodon.socialexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkTIL you can improve your google search result by adding "before:2023"mastodon.socialredcalcium@lemmy.institute to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squarePoggervania@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoNah, DDG is arguably worse than Google now with their search results - I just ended up going back to Google after a couple of years of using DDG.
minus-squareSquizzy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoDidnt go to google but I hate ddg now
minus-squareagent_flounder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoI thought ddg used bing. Gopher it is then!
minus-squareSquizzy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoIt isnt the bing part of ddg it is themselves. They have started tailoring results locally no matter your settings.
minus-squareLvxferre@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoDDG for me was always a matter of exchanging a bit of convenience for a bit of freedom. The results are usually a bit poorer (or extremely poorer if websearching in Italian or Portuguese), but at least it isn’t vulturing my data.
Nah, DDG is arguably worse than Google now with their search results - I just ended up going back to Google after a couple of years of using DDG.
Didnt go to google but I hate ddg now
Bing it is then
I thought ddg used bing.
Gopher it is then!
It isnt the bing part of ddg it is themselves.
They have started tailoring results locally no matter your settings.
DDG for me was always a matter of exchanging a bit of convenience for a bit of freedom. The results are usually a bit poorer (or extremely poorer if websearching in Italian or Portuguese), but at least it isn’t vulturing my data.