• Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    UBI will ultimately end up in the pockets of landlords, shareholders and offshore wealth funds anyway. Sort out the inequality first, then do it.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I do agree with this, without restriction on increases that x increase will just go into basic living services, you saw that with the stimulus checks as well. but part of me wants them to do it then go after everyoje that raised for gorging but I don’t think there is actual prevention of that

  • whoelectroplateuntil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    How else are you supposed to stabilize a highly-developed postindustrial economy with increasingly rare opportunities to get ahead for most of the population? Didn’t you people read your Friedrich Hayek?

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Money isn’t a higher l birthright” says political faction in favor of tax-free inheritance for its filthy rich members. More at 11:00.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Could you do what they did? No, I didn’t think so!

        It’s not easy being born to the right family, if it was easy everyone would do it and it wouldn’t pay so well! Duhhhhhh

        :P

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    UBI is the perfect capitalist solution to the majority of problems. It should allow for less market distortion and could have some really interesting outcomes.

    I’m very excited to see a first world country use UBI.

    That an externalities can go a long, long way in this world.

    • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Capitalism depends on the threat of homelessness to function. UBI can definitely ameliorate the problems of capitalism, but capitalists will constantly fight it. UBI is also a great idea within socialist economies, where there would be no force against it. We should be doing both - eliminate capitalism and provide UBI.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Capitalism depends on the threat of homelessness to function.

        No it doesn’t

        UBI is also a great idea within socialist economies, where there would be no force against it.

        Maybe. But socialism is a stupid inefficient system, so it’s a non starter.

        UBI works very well with the market based capitalist system. That’s where I think it will shine.

        • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Did you know that the US does not have a capitalist system? In fact, it’s silly to think of “capitalism” and “socialism” as systems at all. They aren’t. They are broad systemic feature sets. You’ve probably heard the phrase “mixed economy”. That’s actually what nearly every nation has, a mixed economy, meaning that we have socialist, as well as capitalist, elements. In fact, without socialist elements, the capitalist elements of our economy would have self-destructed a long time ago. You clearly have no idea what capitalism or socialism even are. That’s fine, most people don’t, it’s pretty much the norm, but now that it’s been pointed out to you, you have a choice: learn, and grow, or be a stubborn fool. Hopefully you choose well.

          • Wanderer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Haha I have a degree in economics. That why I can see all the shit you tankies write as just plain wrong.

            But I’m sure your youtube video on Karl Marx makes you an expert on these things.

            People don’t use words as absolutes. America is largely referred to as a capitalist country. My saying that isn’t incorrect. But you can argue technicalities of words all you want, communism sucks or (mixed economies heavily leaning to communism sucks).

  • Masterblaster420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    we could have been living in a utopia 20 years ago or further back even but one thing stands in the way - conservatives. the solution is simple.

      • Masterblaster420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        and what’s standing in the way of dismantling it? conservatives. you give me a problem and i’ll show you how simple solutions are being blocked by conservatives. get rid of conservatives, fix the problem.

        • abuttandahalf@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Depends on how you define conservatives? If you categorize the entire US political spectrum as conservatives (and economically, they are), then sure. In the prevalent usage of the term, that’s not true, because liberals are just as much a barrier because they are capitalists. The entire US political spectrum is ideologically liberal save for a few fascists on the right, and both are capitalist ideologies.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            all of America is Liberal (socio-economic philosophy, not the “left” catchall) and thus they are all conservative

            • Masterblaster420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              “ackshually”… please stop being a nerd. the problem and solution is simple. don’t over complicate it. people know wtf i’m talking about when i say conservative.

              • orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                There is a neat and simple solution for every problem, and it’s always wrong

                • Masterblaster420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  until that solution is the only thing between utopia and dystopia, where the effects of either will be felt for centuries to come. that solution then becomes a necessity. wake up.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You could blame Nader and the 100k Florida Progressives who couldn’t hold their noses and punch the chad for Gore for that. And then remember it in November.

  • Brkdncr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Iowa has been dealing with automation and outsourcing problems for a long time. I’m surprised that the farming families aren’t asking for UBI. Considering how farming subsidies have been in place for decades it wouldn’t even be a big stretch.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You might want to look up how many tax subsidies and federal programs the farmers are protected by. They don’t want anyone else to get a piece of that pie.

  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    ‘Is money a birthright now?’

    Only for some. Or are we outlawing inheritances as well?