10 Reasons You Should Switch From Chrome to Firefox.::The best browser sync out there.

  • pathief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’ve been moving away from Google in the last year and moving to Firefox was one of my first moves. It’s honestly a downgrade in usability but I guess that applies to all alternative products.

    I just wish I could sync my bookmarks between desktop and mobile. Seems like no one has this problem but firefox sync just does not work for me. It just says last update was never. Let me know if you know how to fix it.

    • Delusion6903@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sync works great over here. It even syncs history which is great because I use an extension on the laptop to limit history to 28 days and that becomes synced with Android without an additional extension.

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago
        • Tab Grouping would be my first pick.

        • When I first started using Firefox on Linux, dragging tabs was really reallyyyyyy bad but they have heavily improved it. UI just feels more polished on chrome

        • Sync doesn’t work for me, though it seems to work for everyone else. It doesn’t give me any error or a hint to what the problem might me, which is just bad UX.

        • Chromecasting an entire tab doesn’t work, though I guess can’t we can’t blame Firefox for that, can we?

        • My unit tests take at the very least twice as long to run on Firefox

        • Pinned tabs occasionally just disappear and I have to create everything again. Extensions exist to prevent this but don’t work with multi containers, which is honestly Firefox best feature.

        • ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          What stops you from finding extensions that implement similar functionality? I know tree style tabs are pretty popular instead of tab grouping. This also so the first time I’ve heard of sync or pinned tabs not working. I’m kinda curious ab ur setup if youd be cool with sharing that? I feel like it might be a setup problem instead of a software one.

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Years ago Firefox had a massive memory leak that would wind up crashing FX randomly or just crushing your system resources. The bug persisted for years. and I swirched to Chrome to get away from that poor experience. A few years back, a random community contributer, that was also fed up, dug in and fixed several issues responsible for the leaks. I remeber thinking that I should give FX a go again, but didn’t until relatively recently.

    • DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Switched away to Vivaldi and Opera on desktop years ago due to better design and ability to swap between workspaces. Trying to migrate back to Firefox for ethical reasons. Desktop design still lags behind but privacy is great.

    • Nom Nom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of the privacy aspects mentioned in the article would apply but the extra features(like facebook container) would not. The extension support is also an issue since the extensions themselves have their own privacy policies, so if you get any which are hosted on google owned chrome web store all your privacy cautiousness goes down the drain unless you’re using a vpn.

      Firefox addons also have their own privacy policies but you can simply choose the ones with open source licenses so it should be rather simple to be more protected.

  • MSids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wish the password autofill feature was more robust for Firefox on Android. Using it as my default password provider but it regularly does not pick up on password fields.

    • bcgm3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Dunno if this helps you at all, but I’ve been using BitWarden to manage my passwords since I made the switch from Chrome to Firefox (both on PC and my Android phone). It doesn’t fill passwords automatically in either case, but it’s not much extra work to invoke BitWarden to fill those fields as-needed on either device, and it works very consistently. It’s also (I’m told) much more secure. Just thought I’d share that here!

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve had this happen with obscure government sites that look like they were made in the 90s, I manually add the login & password for these

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    10 reasons:

    1. I always used Firefox
    2. I always used Firefox
    3. I always used Firefox
    4. I always used Firefox
    5. I always used Firefox
    6. I always used Firefox
    7. I always used Firefox
    8. I always used Firefox
    9. I always used Firefox
    10. Google can suck my saggy man tits
  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I used it mainly for debugging sites until whichever update made it fast again recently. It’s noticeably improved.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I never got this whole “speed” argument.

      I never had a lot of difference between both browsers (never got to use chrome much, admittedly), but even when it was supposedly “bad”, Firefox never struck me as being especially slow.

      Was it a windows thing or what?

  • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Screen capture being disabled in private mode on firefox is really reassuring to me.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Anybody else having flaky behavior with youtube videos in Firefox lately? Like, only audio resuming but video freezing after rewinding? I’m wondering if this is intentional on the part of Google.

  • phreekno@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Firefox Multiaccount Containers, the thing that can’t be beat by even the best chrome derivatives

    • Delusion6903@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Forgetting politics, I liked Brave. But sometimes they do seem a little shady. I’m loving Librewolf even more, though there’s no Android version. It does sync with Firefox and Mull though.

  • lovesickoyster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only reason I have chrome even installed is because I am forced to use it for chromecast every once in a while.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I use Ungoogled Chromium exclusively for YouTube, cause my graphics card csn upscale videos and convert them to HDR, but not in Firefox. The moment I get those features in Firefox, I’m done with Chrome for good.

    • Jojo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s a video service my therapist uses that refuses to run in Firefox. I expect it probably could, but it’s a lot less work to just launch chrome for that one use case.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Install a user agent switcher. There are several for Firefox and you can spoof chrome.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Welllll I also have the other use case of my partner refuses to switch, so she wants chrome on the computer too.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Use different user accounts. Do you own thing. You can have both installed.

            • Jojo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I do have both installed, but it’s easier to use chrome for the one use case I have since it’s going to be installed anyway for her

              Edit: oh you mean a user agent switcher too… Well, that seems like work 😛

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m saying that you log in as “jojo” to the computer and another account is called “jojo’s gf”. You can do whatever you want in each and won’t bother the other. Computers are designed for muiltiuser use.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    And one thing that irks is that you can’t have a local file be your homepage and new tab page. I want to have all my work related links in a local immutable HTML page and every new tab or every time I open the browser it goes there for me to choose what of 5 links to pick…time sheet, team site, hr site, all the vendors sites etc…npr, my home servers etc. c’mon man! The only way to make it happen is to serve it on a local server that I am not allowed to install, or a server at home that I don’t actually want to do.

    • JaY_III@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Extensions are your friend My new tab has all my sites pinned. Have a look at the add-ons I am 99% sure what you want has already been made

  • sherlockholmez@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    TAB GROUPS, FIREFOX, BRING BACK TAB GROUPS.

    And no, extensions aren’t helping, their UX is so much worse.

    That’s just a make or break feature for me.

    • jh34ghu43gu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      So I tried to find what tab groups are but most of the results are feature request threads so apologies if this isn’t what you want.

      Waterfox will soon be adding some sort of tab grouping feature akin to what tree-style-tab extension does. Here’s the blogpost about it https://www.waterfox.net/blog/waterfox-x-treestyletab/

      Again I’m not sure if that type of grouping is what you’re looking for but if it is consider watching out for the feature release. Longtime waterfox user and haven’t had many complaints, Alex has quickly responded to the two issues I made in the github including a feature request that got added within a week (ability to unload tabs with right click).

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          When I right click on a tab in Firefox, I can reopen it in a container. The containers (at first glance) seem to be limited to Personal, Work, Banking, Shopping, and Facebook (which is probably there because I have Facebook container installed). In settings I can modify the container tabs available. (And turn the feature on or off, but it’s already on because of Facebook container.)

          Is that what that is? It looks a lot like the example you linked. Firefox 123.0, but it’s been there for quite a while.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not really, though the functionalities are adjacent and I could see how one would make that mistake. I do indeed use container tabs, and they’re a killer feature.

            Tab groups are merely organizational, allowing you to reference, store, close, and save groups of tabs en masse; by contrast, container tabs don’t do ANY organization at all; you can’t group them all together, move them all to a new window as one, bookmark them all, close them all, etc.

            • limelight79@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Interesting, thanks. Seems like the containers could be expanded into the tab group functionality without too much trouble.