They have, I found out about that by witnessing it firsthand. This is basically the only article I could find that talks about it at all, to help provide credibility to my claim.
I don’t see how it would ever lend credibility to your claims when it doesn’t say the same thing you are saying. The closest thing the article says to what you’ve claimed is that it could be used as a tutor.
No thing is saying the thing that I’m saying except for me, but the thing I used to add credibility says that OpenAI has partnered with the University I accused of replacing people with Chatbots, which is true.
So, this article actually disagrees with you, it lends you no credibility at all. You said in another comment that you have evidence, I’d love to see it.
But I’ll go ahead and warn you: if your evidence is just the existence of an SMS “advisor” chat bot, I’m going to be very rude and condescending, and continue to make fun of you, because that isn’t evidence of anybody being “replaced”.
Damn straight. TBF I was a little upset when I found out about it.
Found out about what? That they haven’t actually replaced any staff with chat bots? Because that’s what this article says.
They have, I found out about that by witnessing it firsthand. This is basically the only article I could find that talks about it at all, to help provide credibility to my claim.
I don’t see how it would ever lend credibility to your claims when it doesn’t say the same thing you are saying. The closest thing the article says to what you’ve claimed is that it could be used as a tutor.
No thing is saying the thing that I’m saying except for me, but the thing I used to add credibility says that OpenAI has partnered with the University I accused of replacing people with Chatbots, which is true.
Gee I wonder why. 🙄
This is like hearing that there are giant asteroids in space and jumping to the conclusion that one is headed right for earth.
This is like finding out that asteroids coming towards earth firsthand and nobody believes you because it isn’t in the tabloids yet.
So, this article actually disagrees with you, it lends you no credibility at all. You said in another comment that you have evidence, I’d love to see it.
But I’ll go ahead and warn you: if your evidence is just the existence of an SMS “advisor” chat bot, I’m going to be very rude and condescending, and continue to make fun of you, because that isn’t evidence of anybody being “replaced”.
Thank you for your service. May you have a lot of peach in your life.