For as long as schools have policed hairstyles as part of their dress codes, some students have seen the rules as attempts to deny their cultural and religious identities.

Nowhere have school rules on hair been a bigger flashpoint than in Texas, where a trial this week is set to determine whether high school administrators can continue punishing a Black teenager for refusing to cut his hair. The 18-year-old student, Darryl George, who wears his hair in locs tied atop his head, has been kept out of his classroom since the start of the school year.

To school administrators, strict dress codes can be tools for promoting uniformity and discipline. But advocates say the codes disproportionately affect students of color and the punishments disrupt learning. Under pressure, many schools in Texas have removed boys-only hair length rules, while hundreds of districts maintain hair restrictions written into their dress codes.

Schools that enforce strict dress codes have higher rates of punishment that take students away from learning, such as suspensions and expulsions, according to an October 2022 report from the Government Accountability Office. The report called on the U.S. Department of Education to provide resources to help schools design more equitable dress codes.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    discipline is a bullshit virtue to promote. innate subjection to authority is not something to foster in children

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    funny its only the deep south where black kids are given this kind of treatment.

    might be racist? these kids are being punished for not looking white enough, and the schools admins get to snicker in their racism.

  • HornedMeatBeast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I come from a country with school uniforms and I hated it.

    Felt more like a way to control us and/or it was all about the schoool’s image.

    Our hair had to follow certain rules, short, no colour, no gel.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      we never had hair restrictions … that I bumped up against (even with wild colours) … and getting detention for non sanctioned clothing was a badge of honor. I basically spent my entire final year in a trench coat, and maybe Columbine helped me out a little bit there, but honestly the whole 90’s was basically a class on how to subvert the school dress code for me and my classmates.

      but I guess if you lack imagination it could be a bit stifling not being able to get your personality off the rack.

    • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah we had them in Australia and they fucking suck so bad, not to mention it’s more expensive buying the school clothes you can only ever really wear at school.

      Also had rules around hair, makeup, etc. but I didn’t really run into them too much.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      School uniforms are a related, but different, issue. School dress codes in the U.S. do allow freedom to wear some of what you want, but many of the restrictions are arbitrary “no hats” or antiquated “skirts must be below the knee.” And many of the dress codes are intentionally designed to favor things like white people’s hair without caring about the legitimate physical issues black people might have with those hair codes. Many are also designed to shame girls.

  • kalon@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would have argued against this as a kid, but having since taught overseas in places with school uniforms, I would say that’s the way to go.

    Dictating hairstyles to too much though. Particularly when you consider the variety of hair types you’re going to see in a diverse country like the U.S.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Incorrect. Dress codes are racist and classicist also often the sign of someone trying to groom someone else. You got to be a real fucking sicko to demand a bunch of preteens wear short skirts.

      • desconectado@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think you realise school uniforms are not like they are shown in anime or by Britney spears

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s the thing, though. Dress codes aren’t about uniforms but about uniformity and punishment. It’s about everything else - what haircuts you can have, how much makeup you can put on, whether or not you can use hair gel, etc. It’s an excuse to punish people for not being white enough, or for being women, etc.

      It’s justification for stomping out anything outside of the dominant culture (or what these racists believe the dominant culture should be).

      A uniform is one thing, but so many of these dress codes come down to “we don’t like black people having different hair” or “we want to shame high school girls into wearing long skirts because we believe that men can’t control themselves and the boys and teachers both will be so distracted and horny that they won’t be able to learn/teach.”

      This stuff always reminds me of those ads for skin bleaching kits from around the 60s that had taglines like “Be white. Be loved.”

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah, basically all Japanese schools have strict dress codes and nobody ever complains about cultural or ethnic insensitivity in…

      Checks notes

      …The monocultural ethnostate of Japan.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The title talks about dress codes, but the article focuses almost exclusively on hair.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        My current employee has a dress code that basically boils down to ‘dress professionally, no jeans’ for everyone without any mention of hairstyles. The dress code it replaced about a decade ago had everything including hairstyles defined by gender roles.

        Every dress code I have had at schools or employers included hairstyle rules.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Agreed. Mine is like “if you’re being forced into the office for some raisin, wear anything” so I’m free to Opeth+jeans it up.

            • Alto@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’ve never understood why dress codes beyond “Just don’t look like a slob” exist for non client facing jobs.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                The same reason why Faux News ladies all have straight blonde hair. Makes some old pervert there happy to see the young ones dressed a certain way.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            That is the in office dress code, and is pretty lax for a state agency. Honestly it is pretty reasonable, I mean slacks and a polo is perfectly fine.

            I also get to work from home and it doesn’t matter what I wear there.

    • Poggervania@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, they’re usually part of dress code. Like at my work for instance, it’s part of the dress code to not show any signs of growing facial hair. You can either be clean shaven or have a full beard, but no inbetween.

        • Poggervania@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          For the shaven part, pretty much - you can’t have growing hairs period, so it’s either staying clean shaven or wearing a face mask if you want to grow a beard.

          As for the full beard… I never been able to figure it out, but my rather scraggly looking goatee seems to be ok.

  • random9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I went to highschool for 1 year in the UK, where a uniform was mandatory for every student.

    I can assure you, it does not promote discipline in any way. Kids fight, do stupid things, and skip classes regardless of how they’re dressed.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I don’t believe in dress codes being of benefit, but this is strictly Texas being a dick.

    I was in the Army (for school, the cause sucked), and African American soldiers were often CORRECTLY given a shaving profile, aka a waiver due to in grown hair shaving issues in field conditions, and it wasn’t a deal. At all. In the fucking army, the rule follower kings.

    The Texas government just doesn’t want to make reasonable accommodations because they’re racist pieces of shit who believe they can legislate those outside their rigid in-group out of existence.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve never had a school uniform but someone told me that it could help hide “class” differences if someone were not able to dress their child as well. I’m not sure how well I buy that but it sounded like a possible benefit.

      • shuzuko@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It doesn’t work. You can still always tell the kids who have new uniforms vs those who had to buy second hand, or those who have designer backpacks or shoes from those who have Walmart versions. The rich kids who were raised to be assholes will still find something to look down on the poor kids about. Best friend was stuck in private school for years and hated it because of this.

      • gramathy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Uniforms for me weren’t explicit but more “polo shirt and pants” so it was less a uniform and more a very strict dress code - this was also only in middle school so that kinda tracks with when kids can be some of the most vicious about it

    • cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      sorry can you expand a bit on the ingrown hair part? It doesnt make sense to me why one race would have issue with that while the rest doesnt

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        To expand on the other response, the Army doesn’t deny shaving waivers to white guys either. I had one every time I went overseas because my face is right on the line. With a weekend to rest it, hot water and all the products, it goes okay. But without all that I get rashes. So allowances were made.

      • bufordt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It doesn’t make sense to you that different hair types might have different likelihood of ingrown hairs?

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        sorry can you expand a bit on the ingrown hair part? It doesnt make sense to me why one race would have issue with that while the rest doesnt

        Good question! Would that we were all comfortable expressing our ignorance and asking for edification.

        As I understand it, black people (and others with similar hair type) have a tightly curved hair follicle. The hair grows out of the follicle springy because it kinks before growing out. Like an extreme version of people with curly hair (who also have a curved hair follicle). This means that if the hair is shaved completely it is more likely to become ingrown.

      • Bye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not just black people, it’s just more common with them.

        I have curly facial hair and I have to leave a few mm instead of shaving, or else I get ingrown hairs.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        "Pseudofolliculitis barbae (razor bumps) is a common condition of the beard area occurring in up to 60% African American men and other people with curly hair. The problem results when highly curved hairs grow back into the skin causing inflammation and a foreign body reaction. Over time, this can cause keloidal scarring which looks like hard bumps of the beard area and neck. Shaving sharpens the ends of the hairs like a spear. The hairs then curve back into the skin causing pseudofolliculitis barbae.

        A 100% effective treatment is to let the beard grow. Once the hairs get to be a certain length they will not grow back into the skin. For most cases, totally avoid shaving for 3 to 4 weeks until all lesions have subsided, while applying a mild prescription cortisone cream to the involved skin each morning. Shaving every other day, rather than daily, will improve pseudo-folliculitis barbae. If one must use a blade, water soften the beard first with a hot, wet washcloth for 5 minutes. Then use lubricating shaving gel (Edge, Aveeno), and the Aveeno PFB Bump Fighter Razor or the Flicker razor. Shave with the grain of the beard and do not stretch the skin. Use only one stroke over each area of the beard."

        https://www.aocd.org/page/pseudofolliculitisb#:~:text=Pseudofolliculitis barbae (razor bumps) is,and a foreign body reaction.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      People from the outside see stuff like the drill teams and forget that we’ve been known to fight in body armor, helmet, and our underwear. They think uniformity has some magical property and miss all the real reasons behind it.

  • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Dress codes are a great excuse for racism against anyone you hate, if they really want it it should be more like ‘wear simple and not overly colorful clothes’ or something like that, rather than ‘that hairstyle is not allowed, noo how dare you cover your head!’, this can be done in numerous ways

  • Politically Incorrect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    We should difference between racism and victimizing here. I don’t know which of these two is.

    If the dress code apply for white and black kids I believe it’s just victimizing and shaming racism.

    If the dress code apply only for black or white kids then definetly it’s racism.

    • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It doesn’t have to apply only for one group to be racism. Redlining was a practice that was technically about areas, not people, and there could be white people within those areas, but it’s still racism. If the effects of a policy land disproportionately on one group or affect one group differently, like the shaving policy AllonzeeLV mentioned, where a frequency of shaving harms one group more than another, holding the group that will be harmed to a policy that harms them is racist.

      • Politically Incorrect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Pretty accurate, if someone it’s discriminated for any racial characteristic not just the skin color I believe it’s racism too.

        Anyway dress codes are dress codes it doesn’t matter which race you are if there is a dress code to follow you should follow it.

        Maybe we should talk about dresscodeism.

          • Politically Incorrect@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Oh then hairstylism hard to determine it, curly hair people can’t hair style as straight hair people and viceversa, definetly it could be a problem but at the same time I would be more concerned about the education of the kids than their hair style tbh. What about if all the kids get their head shaved and problem solved?

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You can have policies that equally apply to all people that are still racist. Same with sexist. If, for example, the dress code requires men to have a short list of approved haircuts, and all of them are styles that only work with a specific type of white hair, the policy is racist.

      On the sexism side, if the policy is that everyone must wear an exact uniform, but that uniform doesn’t fit wide hips or large chests, the policy is sexist.

  • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would say that to school, children should be appropriately clothed because it’s an official institution. That means, you should not come there half naked or anything similar. However, uniform/sth very strict seems like a useless move. I can imagine something more comfortable.

  • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think some codes are reasonable, mainly those that promote hygiene, which kids are notoriously bad at.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      can you give me some examples of that? I’ve never seen a policy that your clothes had to be clean but maybe that’s because I never went to look for that sort of thing

      • kuneho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not school rule. It’s parenting rule to provide your kid with clean clothes as much as you can, or at least, it should be.

  • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Even the military has recognized that certain hairstyles are worse on different ethnicities hair, and has subsequently relaxed the standards since I’ve been active.

    The military, which is all about uniformity and “discipline”, can see that different cultures have different hair treatments/needs, and not everything has to be “all Caucasian, all the time”.

    And yet our K-12 schools can’t seem to do that?! Like wtf?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even better, the principle in Texas pointed to the military as a shining example of uniformity. Not realizing the real reasons behind that. (Easy field hygiene)

      Yet again a military larper ruins it for everyone around them.

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Oh they know. Discipline doesn’t mean punishment for wrong deeds, it means forceful changes in any behavior, concepts, or ideas that the one executing the discipline dislikes. Disrespecting your “betters” is always a part of this too. I got pulled over once because I passed a police office. He was going under the speed limit so u went the speed limit and passed him. His reason was not showing due respect.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fun fact. You can take your old school uniform, rip it up with a knife, and mail it to your principal with a note scrolled on it saying “this is what I think of your fucking uniform, shithead”.

  • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why would hair, a part of a person’s body, be a part of a dress code? White people are fucking insane…

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why would dress codes, a part of society broadly, be a part of white people? … white people are whack though

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      how else would discriminate against “people” (hint: they don’t see dark skinned people as people)

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ooh, ooh, how about complaining about their accent and choice of slang! No way that’s going to be racist wink wink nudge nudge

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fools like this want everyone to be invisible, anonymous, and unimportant, being non-white is already a splinter in their eye unless you prove you’re extraordinary