One thing that leaps out at me about this ruling is that courts understand the internet a lot better nowadays. A decade or so ago Sony would have probably gotten away with the argument that Cox profited from the users’ piracy; nowadays judges themselves use the internet and are going to go “lolno, they probably would have been Cox customers anyway. It’s not like anyone pays for internet connection solely to pirate. And in most areas people don’t even have a choice of provider, so how is Cox profiting from this?”

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    yes I guess it is a case of who you know. Most have rules against giving your invites to unknowns too

    • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The private trackers I use have stipulations stating if one of your invited folks breaks the rules you get punished as well. Makes it a very selective process choosing whom to share with.

        • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Exactly. I’d love to share, but I don’t know them. Not risking my account for Mr Rando.

          The select few I do share with get a brief talk from me about being good users and the impacts if they aren’t.