Y’all gonna hate me for this, but I’m simply not going to complain unless there was violence.
I would. The person would be still depriving me from my agency and body autonomy, both things that should be seen as morally inalienable and should be protected by law for everyone, regardless of gender, sex, or sexuality.
There’s probably been […] I’m going home.”
Your personal anecdotes on drunken sex are not argumentation defending your [frankly, idiotic] view.
And as ricecake noted, rape is a specific crime in the UK. There are other laws for woman-on-man non-consent. Put up the pitchforks.
That poster is being informative, and actually talking about the subject from legal grounds. Unlike you.
Hate on me for this as well; Man-on-woman sexual violence is generally far worse. […] PTSD.
Nobody with a sane mind would hate you for the statement itself. Instead they’d hate you for the false dichotomy that clearly set up in the second half of your comment:
“There’s worse shit than this” is NOT rational grounds to imply “this is not an issue”. 50 might not be 100, but it’s not 0 either.
And if you’ve never been raped or taken an ass beating, I don’t care much for your opinion.
Translation: “I’ll insert some arbitrary restriction on whom I shall allow to contradict my claim, because I feel entitled to be heard but I don’t want to hear the others.”
/me whispers "shalafi, the world does not revolve around your belly button."
Your take on this matter is fucking stupid. Deal with it.
I would. The person would be still depriving me from my agency and body autonomy, both things that should be seen as morally inalienable and should be protected by law for everyone, regardless of gender, sex, or sexuality.
Your personal anecdotes on drunken sex are not argumentation defending your [frankly, idiotic] view.
That poster is being informative, and actually talking about the subject from legal grounds. Unlike you.
Nobody with a sane mind would hate you for the statement itself. Instead they’d hate you for the false dichotomy that clearly set up in the second half of your comment:
“There’s worse shit than this” is NOT rational grounds to imply “this is not an issue”. 50 might not be 100, but it’s not 0 either.
Translation: “I’ll insert some arbitrary restriction on whom I shall allow to contradict my claim, because I feel entitled to be heard but I don’t want to hear the others.”
/me whispers "shalafi, the world does not revolve around your belly button."Your take on this matter is fucking stupid. Deal with it.