I need some relationship advice. I suggested 125% but my wife won’t budge from 10%. Is this normal? How did it go when you had this conversation with your romantic partner?

  • monko@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I wouldn’t call 10% of the time “often,” but let’s entertain the idea that it’s a popular concept regardless. We’ll say 100% of people are like this. And they’re constantly trying to trade up. What does that look like? Would most relationships be based on mutual trust and compassion, or would they be cynical cycles of mercenary evaluation?

    Meanwhile, though you seem very rational, even the most rational person isn’t free from their subjective experience or perception. It begs the question: how much do you trust your partners’ assessment of you, or themselves, to stay the same for years to come? I can promise it will not. In this paradigm of value-over-commitment, all relationships (even poly ones) are doomed to fail.

    When you make a proper commitment to someone (or multiple someones), you’re not shirking the negative possibilities by leaving your “trade-up threshold” unsaid. You’re saying, “I accept the good with the bad.”

    And no, I’m not saying people should stick with an abusive partner or someone they don’t like or love. I’m saying that the “trade-up” model is an oversimplified view that places the onus of being “good enough” on another person while shedding the fundamental responsibilities of growing both as individuals and together.

    Sure, “happily ever after” is a fantasy, but working toward a lifelong partnership isn’t—unless, of course, you’ve got one foot out the door from day one.

    • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If things change, either internally or interpersonally, and people do change, then I’d rather be able to have an open discussion in those cases as well. I’m into my seventh year with my primary, and I don’t foresee things breaking down in a hurry. Still, if being with me was bringing him more suffering than satisfaction, I’d want to know that. It may be that things can be improved within the relationship, although they likely won’t without communication. It may also be that things can be improved within the relationship, in which case I’d prefer to know that. I want my partners to be happy, and while there would be an emotional hit to learn that they would be happier without me, I value them being happy more than I value trying to maintain a relationship that is a drag. Like fish, once the relationship is dead I think it’s better to get rid of it before it starts to stink. I don’t think that a relationship that doesn’t make the people in it happy is worth maintaining for the sake of maintaining it.

      • monko@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        All I’m saying is, much like using a litany of addons for World of Warcraft, that it’s possible to optimize yourself out of happiness. I don’t trust myself (or anyone else) enough to say what “percent” better someone would need to be to ditch a long-standing partnership, and anyone who does is probably a narcissist.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I still kind of miss DBM, since I raid on FFXIV these days.

          I would expect a narcissist to be completely incapable of making such an evaluation to any degree of accuracy; the kind of self honesty it would require seems foreign to my understanding of the narcissistic mind. Is it possible you were thinking of sociopathy here?