I’d expected this but it still sucks.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      He should really switch to LXD/Incus, not Proxmox as it will end like ESXi one day.

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          And… this how I know you’re full of shit. LXD uses QEMU/KVM/libvirt for VMs thus the performance is at least the same as any other QEMU solution like Proxmox, the real difference is that LXD has a much smaller footprint, doesn’t depend on 400+ daemons thus boots and runs management operations much faster. The virtualization tech is the same and the virtualization performance is the same.

          Here’s one of my older LXD nodes running HA:

          It’s “so hard” to run HA under LXD… you just have to download the official HA OS image and import to LXD.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sorry I meant high availability as in the ability to live transfer a VM to a different host without downtime or service interruptions.

            I hear that I lot of people are using LXC. Are you using a container runtime in the LXC container? (i.e. docker or podman)