• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    No need to get insulting, ma nude. Still not sure in what world your statement could be regarded as subjective in intend. Please, enlighten me.

    • NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Opinions, such as “all methods of decaffeinating coffee are blasphemy” are subjective in their very nature. What makes this more obvious is that the definition of blasphemy is entirely subjective and can’t even begin to be assessed objectively until at very minimum a religious dogma is declared for the basis of evaluation.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        the definition of blasphemy is entirely subjective

        I disagree. IMHO, the accusation of blasphemy presupposes a dogma to actually make sense.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            … Any dogma? It’s like the claim “that’s illegal” presupposes a body of law. No matter which one.

            • NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              That’s not how legal systems work… Plenty of things are legal in one place and illegal in another. No Christians are worried about blasphemy against Zeus or Jupiter. Like wise a Zoroastrian is only concerned about blasphemy against Ahura Mazda and not Allah.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m claiming that the accusation or blasphemy presupposes a frame or reference. In this frame of reference, you can make objective statements. Not that this frame of reference is absolute.

                In your line o reasoning, velocity would be subjective.

                • NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Velocity is not suggestive because it is defined as speed in a direction.

                  In your example you are only taking speed, assuming direction and stating velocity.