• FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      but that’s just your estimation of it. shouldn’t we give a TON of latitude when it comes to deciding that in a sub called “NO STUPID QUESTIONS”? or is your judgement the barometer for stupidity?

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        But those aren’t stupid questions, they are questions very smartly crafted to imply a certain answer or legitimize a problem. Then they are not stupid, but smart. And often evil.

      • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not about “stupid” for me but about the amount of loadedness in a question. There are indeed no stupid questions - but there are stupid assumptions.

        Even one answer from. OP in it’s often easy to see if they want to generate knowledge of search confrontation.

        • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          a ‘loaded’ question doesn’t have to be malicious. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

          • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            If someone says that, I assume they intend to use malice and blame it on stupidity so they don’t look malicious.

            • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              what exactly about my responses illicit the perceived notion that i’m upset? simply because i disagree with your poor ascertaition of what a sub called “no stupid questions” should entertain? perhaps more people should disagree with you so you get used to hearing “no”.

              • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Most not upset people wouldn’t exert such an effort over someone else’s opinion on something so irrelevant as you have.

                And it’s incredibly ironic that you should suggest I get used to people disagreeing with me when this entire conversation exists as a result of you having a problem with what I said.

                Get your house in order, kid.

                • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  What “effort”? has no one EVER expressed dissent with you? do you just surround yourself with people that agree with what you have to say? or do you beat people down around you into agreeing with you? seems like we know which one you are. not everyone bows to tyrants.

                  • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    This entire discussion exists because of your inability to accept someone’s opinion that differs from yours.

                    I’m beginning to think you have some mental health issues.