As the US military begins integrating AI technology, simulated wargames show how chatbots behave unpredictably and risk nuclear escalation

Did nobody really question the usability of language models in designing war strategies?

  • huginn@feddit.itEnglish
    0·
    9 months ago

    To be fair they’re not accidentally good enough: they’re intentionally good enough.

    That’s where all the salary money went: to find people who could make them intentionally.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      9 months ago

      GPT 2 was just a bullshit generator. It was like a politician trying to explain something they know nothing about.

      GPT 3.0 was just a bigger version of version 2. It was the same architecture but with more nodes and data as far as I followed the research. But that one could suddenly do a lot more than the previous version, so by accident. And then the AI scene exploded.

      • Limitless_screaming@kbin.social
        0·
        9 months ago

        It was the same architecture but with more nodes and data

        So the architecture just needed more data to generate useful answers. I don’t think that was an accident.