“Why Do So Many Music Venues Use Ticketmaster?” “What’s It Like to Train to Be a Sushi Chef?” “How Do Martial Artists Break Concrete Blocks?” If you were looking for answers to such questions 10 years ago, your best resource for finding a thorough, expert-informed response likely would have been one of the most interesting and longest-lasting corners of the internet: Quora.

  • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you were looking for answers to such questions 10 years ago, your best resource for finding a thorough, expert-informed response likely would have been one of the most interesting and longest-lasting corners of the internet: Quora.

    I disagree, the best place for such answers used to be Reddit, and Stack Exchange for the techy stuff. Quora always felt like cancer for some reason and I never really used it.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think that’s because Quora paywalls responses from volunteers, preventing others from seeing them unless they pay a subscription. Pretty scummy.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wouldn’t call it scummy, just bad business, give people one premium answer per week, so they know the quallity and at incentivised to pay.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It is though, because they gamed search engines well enough to frequently be in the top results yet never had an answer you could see. Annoying as fuck

        • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do they pay the people who answer the questions? I genuinely don’t know. But if they don’t then, yes, it is scummy to just profit off of someone else’s work and not pay them.

          • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ve contributed to sites like Wikipedia.

            Not everything needs to be measured in money though. There’s inherent satisfaction in the work with things like this. And at the end of the day, we all benefit from having platforms with accurate, well thought out answers. Today you’re answering, tomorrow you’re the one with the question.

            • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Wikipedia is run by a nonprofit. They don’t monetise volunteer contributions and they don’t paywall the knowledge on their site, they run on donations. It’s not really a comparable situation.

    • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Here’s hoping at some point search engines will return Lemmy links when people look for answers, but we’re not there yet

      • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think Something will have to change quite significantly.

        Search engines give heavy weighting to uniqueness of content. And with Lemmy content being replicated across the fediverse that doesn’t exactly happen.

        And I’m not sure you can set a canonical URL that’s off site. And then, if it does and that site goes down, you “lose” the content.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not just that it’s not unique, but any single instance is less heavily viewed, even if the overall response is

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem with Lemmy is the federated content gets duplicated on multiple sites, word for word, which isn’t good for SEO

      • crazyCat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Have we said anything useful yet? Just kidding, but I just look for casual commentary on here, all surface level and meme stuff when tired at the end of the day.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        search engines are thoroughly crap right now. Abandon all hope that they will become better.

      • Russ@bitforged.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Kagi now has a lens for focusing results from the Fediverse, I’ve seen it pull Lemmy links before!

    • Haus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d say there was a period before reddit hit its pinnacle where Quora was significantly better. Probably more than 10 years ago, though, and only for a few years. I remember when I started spending more time on Reddit than Quora.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I worry that it will abruptly die one day and we’ll lose that. Perhaps someone should be archiving good quora information lol.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Another social media site which followed the enshittification paradigm. This playbook has played out so many times until now. Start it with “good intentions” as a for-profit startup. People join and volunteer their time because the founders say all the right things and the site culture is so new and exciting. Once the site gets popular though, all the fancy talk from the founders goes out the window.

    When will people learn this lesson? Don’t ever volunteer your time on a for-profit proprietary social network. You will get rugpulled! We are all the value in all these sites. Why do we let them control our interactions, ffs?!

    PS: Would be interesting to get a fediverse version of Quora. Or Maybe we can make something using Lemmy communities instead.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Volunteer your time, but do it with your eyes open.

      If you’re okay with how it’s going to end up, it’s all good.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Would be interesting to get a fediverse version of Quora

      A Fediverse version of Stack Exchange would be easier - since the content is creative commons you could start with a full catalog of already answered questions…

      But honestly, competing with the real Stack Exchange on one end and Large Language Models on the other end… never going to work.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You mean like c/asklemmy?

      I think Reddit almost had it for awhile. There was a point when stuff like r/askhistorians and the like actually worked, and you’d get fairly good answers. That’s one place where the Fediverse isn’t up to speed yet, for that sort of thing you need a critical mass of “everybody uses it” to really achieve.

      So far Lemmy is at its best in the hobby subs because three people with the same hobby will still have fun talking, but if I say “nutritional anthropologists of Lemmy: when and where did humans begin eating cheese?” it’s gonna be crickets because there’s probably not a nutritional anthropologist to be found among us.

  • maness300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s so fucking stupid how it it always defaults to “similar questions” instead of just showing us the actual answers.

    Just another example of throwing as much shit at an audience to drive up “engagement.”

  • ShustOne@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    A horrible user experience with an insufferable userbase. I can’t believe it even lasted this long.

    Who thought it would be great if similar questions overpowered the one you searched for?

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The Quora experience:

      “Hey Quorans, how many carrots go in a carrot stew?”

      Answer to a similar question: “Why does Bugs Bunny eat carrots?”

      unfunny joke “I have an IQ of 128” sarcasm Anyways to answer the question, it’s because he needs good eyesight.

  • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This article links to a Tweet of a screen recording of a TikTok of a screenshot of a Reddit post as proof that Quora is “hateful”. Yeesh.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Only for being laughably awful. Quora was in this place where the answers were just good enough that you probably wouldn’t be able to dispute any obvious flaws without being a subject matter expert already. Yahoo Answers was only a meme factory.

  • egitalian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good riddance honestly, never have I gotten a good answer from Quora, seems like they’re all trolls. So for the past decade+ I overlook ANY Quora links related to my search

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you had a question that attracted an expert in a relevant field, you’d get a good answer. If your question didn’t attract them you’d get a random internet stranger

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Quota was just Ask Jeeves 2.0… Both relied on human “experts” and neither could figure out a long term monetization plan.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It was always a garbage site, and it hid behind a requirement to login just to view more than like 1 question, amd it was full of creepy discussions.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      People who fucked their mothers, how did it happen? How was the experience? (In great detail) ((Asking for a friend)) (((Only serious answers)))

  • Jin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Never used it, noticed it was infected with Chinese and Russian propaganda.