- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
I’ve been working really hard to research and rank messaging apps by their privacy. The more green boxes the better.
I plan to turn PrivacySpreadsheet.com into a place for privacy data on everything from cars to video games. It’s all open source too on GitHub.
Not trying to advertise, I just put a lot of time into researching all this, and I want to share it since I think others could benefit.
You must log in or register to comment.
The messaging app front I consider to be a long-term stalemate, mainly due to crippling network effects. Another factor is that strange psychology at play when making app decisions, where a person will have page after page of junk apps on their phones, yet utterly balks at the notion of installing a second messenger.
Even if a large actor (say, the EU?) managed to bruteforce some interoperability into being, I wonder whether that would be to the detriment of small apps in terms of undermining (or even eliminating) their privacy protections. I can use the likes of Session or Simplex all day long, but if the other side of the conversation is on a corporate product like Whatsapp… It runs into the same problem as email.
where a person will have page after page of junk apps on their phones, yet utterly balks at the notion of installing a second messenger.
Ffs this drives me crazy.
I have a friend who bitches about SMS being shit, every.single.day.
But will they use another app? No. “I don’t want to have to use different messaging apps”. Oh, so what you’re saying is you’re OK with how shitty SMS is. So stop complaining.
Really, it’s not like you don’t already have 3 email accounts, and have had a few phone numbers. And your friends numbers have changed over the years too.
This is something you use all day, every day. Not hard to find a conversation - hell, both iOS and Android show you this on a per contact basis.
So I’m not sure what’s really going on when people say this. There’s some other weird mental thing happening.
Not that I give a shit, but I can see you potentially catching some flack for listing the USA as an “authoritarian regime” lmfao
Removed by mod
I wouldn’t say worse than China, but I’d say they’re both equal, in their own way.
It’s the nature of state politics and security. I’d bet even money every government on the planet is equally bad, up to the resources they have at their disposal.
Remember, all governments are collections of individuals, and individuals range in their morality.
Certain types are attracted to certain opportunities…like the power of government.
Where’s the lie?
They hate him, because he told the truth.
Lets be honest, its not much different from China. They both make social media companies censor, and they both track citizens to predict their likliness of committing a crime in the future.
Thanks for this, I like the idea.
Is there a way to lock the left cells while scrolling through the other messengers?
Working on it, hard to do well without JavaScript while maintaining the ease of webpage generation
Don’t do this with JavaScript ffs
I will not include any JS in the site. I’m not a web dev, I’m a mobile app dev, so web dev is new to me
This is a really cool idea, will share it around!
Maybe add the website on the GitHub-Repo as the projetc-site URL, makes it easier to navigate.
This makes me feel things. Incredible.
The issue with me is ease of use to use with other people. I’ve tried Matrix and Session with other tech minded people and it’s not nearly as seemless as Signal. I’m just waiting for an app that ticks all my boxes, really looking forward to Signal usernames though.
Signal really is that better replacement for WhatsApp since the functionality is identical, others would have to force people to get used to the different ui and the options.
Except Signal UI is… Not good. It feels like using a texting app.
Between the UI and dropping SMS support, I can’t get anyone to use it anymore, and people I had using it have moved on.
Dropping SMS is really frustrating - it was the big selling point I had.
but it is a texting app…
I’m one of those people who thinks SMS has no place in a private messaging app. Signal is the gold standard, and enabling sms merely legitimised this incredibly non private and antiquated messaging protocol.
And gave a constant reminder to people that something better was right there.
And put things in one place.
You’re letting perfect be the enemy of good. At least with SMS support I could get people to switch to “this new texting app”, and we’d then have a proper Signal encrypted chat. And when they texted someone else, Signal would append the “you could have encryption too” signature, generating a conversation about it.
The people who moved off of Signal went back to SMS entirely. How is that better?
Huge bummer. Kind of understood why they did it but they lost a lot of people because of this.
Everyone. Everyone. I mean everyone here misses the biggest plus for WhatsApp compared to pretty much every other messenger. Signal is pretty much the only one as “simple” as it.
We are all too big of privacy geeks to realize what non-tech-savvy people go through with these.
-
Sign up process is dead simple from your phone. It is literally as simple as putting in your phone and PIN. Once you hit the “choosing server” on people using matrix for the first time, you have already lost them. Completely. The exact same thing happened with mastodon and lemmy. People who had no idea about how federation and decentralization were instantly lost
-
Backups: backing up is a process that the users have to do on a lot of matrix clients, or not available. People want to be able to simply move to a new phone by installing the new app, logging in, and being right back with all of your old messages. Even on signal you still have to restore the automatic backup. If you don’t have that file, you are screwed. I can’t remember if Element will sync your messages automatically to a new device.
Those 2 things and population are literally the only thing that the average person actually cares about outside of other people being available on the platform.
-
I’ve been using Matrix for years, but now only as a replacement for IRC. The encryption key handling has always been cumbersome and flakey, and too easily broken by users. Not compromised “broken”, but locked out “broken.” It’s been like this for years, and while the UI has improved, it’s still too hard for casual users to confidently use; I’ve given up hope that it’ll ever get to a point where I can recommend it to friends who don’t give a fuck how it works, and who aren’t interested in spending a half hour figuring out how to set things up - they just want it to work. So many encrypted messaging systems have done this correctly, I dispair that Matrix can’t (it’s a common issue with all clients, so I blame the design of the protocol).
Edit oh, I also wanted to say I’d also been disillusioned with Matrix when I realized I couldn’t run my own server. That is, I technically could; I just couldn’t afford to. Synapse is a hot mess of a server, but it also just pounds on the CPU and requires massive amounts of disk space (over time). Matrix is designed such that all content for channels joined by any user is replicated to the user’s home server. It’s a questionable design decison, at best, but a consequence is that regardless of the server software, the storage requirements make running a home server cost prohibative. Compared to, say, running an xmpp server, which could be done effectively on a Pi.
Replicating all chat history + attachments provides a lot of resilience to the network from a node going down, but at the cost preventing to the home lab user from practically hosting a server which just means everything centralizes around Matrix.org, & when anyone on Matrix.org chats with you or your group, that metadata gets synced back to the central hub server once outwardly funded by Israeli intelligence.
I made the mistake of getting my family to switch to Signal. It works great for messaging, but it has other issues—beyond the typical SIM-required complaint. I hate that you have to register with a ‘primary’ device on either iOS or Android fueling that duopoly (SoL if you are on a postmarketOS or KaiOS or Capyloon phone… or just don’t want a internet-capable phone). Notifications are sent thru Google’s FSM (news 1–2 months ago that of course Apple & Google send all the metadata to the feds) & refuse to support UnifiedPush (thank goodness the Molly fork does). They’re also not too happy to support alternative clients meaning you are stuck with the shitty, resource-sucking Electron client while not having a web client or native or TUI client. And the worst cherry on top is shipping those iOS emoji to Android & Linux …eww.
-
Yeah not having it as a default SMS app sucks. Can’t really argue with you there. Perhaps, one could make a fork with it?? Just thought of that now.
-
I seriously doubt any encrypted messenger is going to support OS like KaiOS or non internet capable devices.
-
For unified push, just use molly.
-
iOS emojis…I really don’t care, Signal devs have other things to worry about.
With an FPGA or special CPU instruction set, the encryption algorithms could run on a toaster—which would give access to whatever low-spec handheld you wanted without making it chug to have strong encryption. That also still isn’t covering the future hope of a Linux phone, or someone that just wants to register an account on their laptop.
Using forks puts stress on other teams to keep up with breaking changes, & 90%+ of folks won’t be looking for forks or be willing to trust their unofficial status. I saw the code for UnifiedPush as a Mattermost plugin & it was like 50 lines or something small which is much less than the rest while allowing users to keep control of their metadata which is a big deal if you care about privacy. A fork for SMS support would encounter similar issues, & now you either need to compete with Molly or copy its featureset otherwise users have to choose, SMS or UnifiedPush. That said, I agree with the SMS situation since it was easy to convince relatives to use this new “text app” where encryption magically came to a chunk of their contact list.
Saying emoji was the most important was tongue-in-cheek, but it makes the application feel non-native (& I like Apple’s emoji are particularly ugly). You would think at least the Google set was shipped to Android, or—now hear me out—not ship emoji, don’t override the user experience, let the user’s fontconfig display the one they set. Shipping a whole font (or images) for emoji is why the application size is so bloated for a chat app.
The first two arguments I get. But the emoji argument about not shipping them at all? Yeah if this is going to be a mainstream and easy to use app then that won’t fly. My friends, family, and I all use emojis, gifs, and stickers. I’m sure many people enjoy these things as well. All that bloat.
Are you using a device without an emoji font installed on the system at all? The web works just fine without browsers shipping an emoji font.
-
Session?
Working on it
The is the messenger matrix from the German blog Kukitz-Blog (it is a blog with a strong focus on privacy and is in my opinion well informed). But no worries, the matrix is also available in English.
Maybe you can take some inspiration from the matrix.
You got some errors for XMPP e2ee: the popular mobile clients all enable it by default, it has perfect forward secrecy and a/v calls are usually also e2ee and of course data is encrypted in transit.
Yep. Really need to compare the best-practice XMPP clients (e.g. Conversations, Siskin), not half-developed clients more suited to the XMPP landscape of 20 years ago. – Just as Matrix’s ranking in the table is high because only the state-of-the-art clients are considered – there are plenty of Matrix clients which don’t support e2ee, for example.
This list of mistakes isn’t exhaustive, but extending from poVoq’s mentions, here are some things XMPP(conversations) does actually have positive findings for:
- End to end encrypted by default [OMEMO]
- End to end encryption is available [OMEMO]
- Voice/video calls are end to end encrypted [“calls are always end-to-end encrypted with DTLS-SRTP”]
- Utilizes Perfect Forward Secrecy [OMEMO]
- Data is encrypted in transit [TLS and OMEMO]
- You can verify contacts out of band [https://gultsch.de/trust.html]
- There has been a third party code audit [2016]
- Provider can scan for illegal content [If you send content unencrypted, otherwise no different to Matrix/Signal]
I’m not sure there’s much differentiation between any apps when it comes to “What can the apps hand to police?”; if the police have physical access to your device and app, they have access to everything you do on that device/app.
Wow, that’s amazing, It’s huge! A staggering amount of work has gone into that, well done!
@UnHidden
A Mastodon post linking to a Lemmy post linking to a GitHub with no info worth only a .com website link leftDidn’t know my patience can be used up before seeing anything worthwhile
(And frankly, I would still bet the ranking somehow confuses privacy with anonymity)
It’s got that telegram is funded by Russia, is that true?
Wikipedia says the opposite.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegram_(software)
Telegram was launched in 2013 by the brothers Nikolai and Pavel Durov. Previously, the pair founded the Russian social network VK, which they left in 2014, saying it had been taken over by the government. Pavel sold his remaining stake in VK and left Russia after resisting government pressure.
Telegram was suddenly unblocked in Russia after getting a bunch of money from the Kremlin.
https://www.wired.com/story/the-kremlin-has-entered-the-chat/
The Moscow Times reported that the investments included $75 million from a joint partnership between an Abu Dhabi state fund and a Kremlin sovereign wealth fund.
Uggh, that’s a bit concerning.
Removed by mod
Really? Because that’s how I use it. There’s nothing “public” about anything I use in it.
There’s also fully end-to-end encrypted chats.
Removed by mod
Thx for the effort 🙏, the repo looks very interesting gonna have a look later
who has analyzed the code to determine how sweet new comer SimpleX really is?
Well, Trail of Bits did more than a year ago
simplex.chat/blog/20221108-simplex-chat-v4.2-security-audit-new-website.html
