He was abducted by Hagrid when he turned 11 so that would place him maybe around the fifth or sixth grade.

I don’t know if canonically there are math classes at Hogwarts.


The thought came to while I was watching the anime Mashle.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m sure Hogwarts also covered general education stuff but that would be boring to us so they focused on the magic stuff. That’s my theory though.

    • Corroded@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Boring? This is the same universe where wizards canonically defecated in the streets and used fecal vanishing spells.

      However, when Hogwarts’ plumbing became more elaborate in the eighteenth century (this was a rare instance of wizards copying Muggles, because hitherto they simply relieved themselves wherever they stood, and vanished the evidence), the entrance to the Chamber was threatened, being located on the site of a proposed bathroom.

      https://www.wizardingworld.com/writing-by-jk-rowling/chamber-of-secrets

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Im surprised that’s so controversial. I would expect wizards to do exactly that if it wasn’t for modern plumbing, I mean, people used to shit in pots and dump it out their window into the street in the morning. Or crap in a cold and smelly hole inside a basic wooden shed out in their yard.

        If you have magic at that point why would you not instead delete it afterwards, considering the alternatives?

        • Corroded@leminal.spaceOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Does vanishing feces mean is deleted though or is it going to end up in the walls of buildings like Arby’s wrappers left behind by construction workers?

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think there’s a throwaway line in a book that a wizard discovered vanishing things sent them to another dimension.

            • Iapar@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Imagine it landed in our dimension and people are trying to make sense of it.

              “Honey, I think the dog shat on the chandelier…”

          • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, none of them seem to be aware of guns. You now how often dark wizards do spells in the books to protect themselves against projectiles? Never. They never do a spell like that, so far as I know.

            • Azzu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              As far as I know, the Protego spell protects against physical forces. The reason no one uses projectiles (they certainly could catapult stuff around with spells as well) is probably because it’s common knowledge that it does nothing.

  • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Okay dude… Because of YOU I started watching Mashle and I’m not even big into anime. I’ve watched a few and like some occasionally…

    Mashle is awesome. Damn/thank you.

  • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t remember where the books said it, but I remember them saying that they go to school before hogwarts the way that we go to school there just isn’t magic. Harry and Hermoine talked about going to school.

  • 520@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hermione mentioned in the first book that wizards tend to absolutely suck at things that are typically Muggle, like logic, so it follows that they probably suck at math too.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        True, but their methods of learning do not differ significantly from that of muggles. They still need to take classes the same way we do, and this would need to learn maths and logic the same way too.

    • Corroded@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I wonder if she struggles with reading as well considering the most advanced thing she’s probably read is Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

      • wildcardology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        She successfully brewed a complicated polyjuice potion that took months to make by just reading and following the instructions in the book when she was 12. She reads just fine.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        ???

        Reading is very common at Hogwarts and the wider wizarding world. Hogwarts has an extensive library, and most of their communications and news media are done over written mediums.

        Contrast that to maths where the hardest thing most wizards would realistically have to do is basic money operations. Made even harder by their bonkers monetary system.

        • allywilson@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think the OP meant that if they all stopped learning maths at 10, and there was no English class at Hogwarts, they probably stopped learning to read at 10 as well (well, the Muggles anyway, there’s no mention of how the Wizards learn anything before 11 I don’t think?).

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            There wouldn’t be additional English literature classes, sure, but by age 11 it’s mostly just practice and looking up words you don’t know anyway.

            • allywilson@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think that’s a bit over simplified. Do you think they’d be able to understand Shakespeare? Or a spell book from the same time as Shakespeare? There’s a reason we continue to teach English until a child leaves secondary/high school.

              • 520@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Do you think they’d be able to understand Shakespeare? Or a spell book from the same time as Shakespeare?

                The bigger question is, do they need to understand Shakespeare?

                Shakespeare is important in UK Muggle culture, not so much elsewhere, including the wizarding world which very much has their own cultural icons.

                They probably aren’t getting their spells from books that old either. The reason we don’t transpose Shakespeare to modern language is the loss of artistic intent in the process. Something that wouldn’t apply to purely factual books like a spell book.

                Besides, they are expected to learn Latin; that’s where their spells come from.

  • Isakk86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    YEAH! Where’s the book where he just does algebra and other boring shit for 300 pages.

  • piecar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think you’re right. They probably don’t know math. I mean, what would they need it for? They probably don’t have to follow the laws of physics for the most part. If math is done it’s probably 100% recreational.

  • morphballganon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So that would put him only a couple years ahead of most republicans

    They have arithmancy but Harry never took it AFAIK

  • rifugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    To be fair, I suspect the average adult in real life probably only remembers, and uses, 5th grade math.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Although that could also be them being perplexed by the fact that muggles did it with no magic at all.

      Imagine us discovering a species that developed computers and tech just like ours, but using neither transistors nor electricity.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Muggles is wizard slang for non-magical human beings. Like Darren on Bewitched would be a muggle. He cooks his food using an oven instead of magic. The oven is muggle tech.

          • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            The preferred term is NaMP - Not a Magical Person/Non-Magical Person. You could also say “Person of Non-Magic,” but it’s hard to pronounce “ponm.”

            • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Idk I can’t remember anyone in Harry Potter using it as a straight up slur, the worst I can think of is some people use it in a rude way like “The Blacks” or “The Gays”. I haven’t read them in a long time tho, I just remember mudblood being a slur and muggle being the accepted term, even by muggleborn magic users

              • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                What’s wrong about saying the blacks or the gays? That’s just refering to a specific group of people. Only thing I can see as problematic is the generalization that follows but that’s always the case when talking about groups.

                • Bgugi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  People take offense to using adjectives describing a group of people as a noun. For example “the black community” or “people who are gay” describe a subset (describe a portion of the overall community,) whereas “the blacks” or “the gays” describe a distinct set (and imply that group as an “other”)

              • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s because Mudblood is a magic user born from a Muggle family. A different term from Muggle itself. Pretty sure Muggle is an accepted term in the overall society (it’s used in the Ministry’s Department name for example), except from a few ‘activists’ you might hear of.

                I believe there’s someone like that in Hogwarts Legacy as well.

            • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Muggle isnt a slur, just as wizard isnt a slur. It’s not a derogatory term. It’s just their word for non-magic people while non-magic people use the word wizard or witch.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      could hogwarts defeng itself against modern weapons? like missils and shit?

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah. Easily.

        Reducto or any of a dozen other spells that make shit explode, magical barriers, simply transfiguring the weapons to something else… telekinesis. Simply not being there.

        And before you add “what if they were surprised…” …. It’s possible, but remember how shocked Hagrid was about the lie the Dursley’s told Potter? “A car crash?! A Car CRASH?! Kill lily and James potter?!….”

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            pretty fast reaction time to not die in a car crash, too. and your forgetting the part about wards and protection spells just stopping things cold.

        • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t know. I’ve always thought a sniper could have taken out Voldemort. Far away, camouflaged, and the bullet gets there faster than the sound. It’s a reaction time thing.

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Obviously, JK Rowling was not a tactical mastermind.

            However in the universe she created, any powerful wizard worth a damn would simply keep protective shields up all the time, especially against such simple things like “fast objects hitting them”.

            Protego seems to be doing a lot with barely any effort to cast. Fred&George even create permanently enchanted clothing with Protego on it.

          • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Reaction time isn’t really relevant when you are good at divination and ultra sensory perception.

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              He came from muggle land, so he is probably aware of guns. He could probably easily made his skin bullet proof with some spell. It’s not like wizards can’t invent new spells and magic. They just almost always seem to choose not to. I think the vast majority of wizards are lazy hacks.

              • fkn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I also think it’s just supposed to be hard to make new magic and the spells that are common were built to be common.

                For example, it is possible for anyone to write a new program for their phone. How many people actually can or do? How many people, with some training, can use most of not all of the programs that others have built to be productive.

                • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  How hard can it be? The Weasleys are all adept at it. The mother showcases spells and items never seen before or again in the story. The father turns muggle objects into working magical objects, the most famous being the car that can fly. The twins create three stories worth of magical objects for their store.

                  Maybe your right and the Weasleys, Snape and Voldemort are some of the most intelligent wizards.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I would expect Voldemort to have protective spells keeping things like that from happening.

            If it were that easy to kill a witch or wizzard… then there’s lots of ways to go about that. He wouldn’t have needed a special wand to fight Harry. he’d just fling a ginormous rock out of nowhere.

            • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Well, we know that wizards are vulnerable to physical attack and to surprise attacks. There’s the whomping willow, which they can’t just cast a force field against. There were the spiders and the centaurs in the forest. The big three headed dog. That devil’s something plant. And if I recall, Voldemort didn’t realize the caretaker had come into the house until he was in the hallway and Nagini saw him. Sorry, it’s been a hot minute since I read those.

              Wizards, one would think, could go flinging cars around whenever they wanted to, but they use death spells, even on muggles. Maybe they think it’s gauche to do something so mundane as dropping a rock on someone’s head, I couldn’t say. Jedi use the Force to throw things, but not to just crush someone’s head or rip it from their body. That would take a lot less force (so to speak) than lifting an X-wing, but they still use lightsabers.

              And for what it’s worth, I think a sniper could take out a Jedi, too.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Well, we know that wizards are vulnerable to physical attack and to surprise attacks…

                the killing curse is probably simply more efficient for the task at hand. It’s also by and large, more discrete. In any case, all the things you listed were evaded by a couple of poorly taught kids. Like literally… children. Fluffy, the devil’s vine thing, (along with all the other challenges from teachers)… one of those kids had exactly a year’s worth of experience with magic. I could also kill an M1A1 Abrams with a rock if I stuffed it in the right place. (I’m thinking exhaust.). Doesn’t mean i want to fight an Abrams with a rock. or… at all.

                again for surprise …[Hagrid’s insistence a mere car crash woudln’t kill the Potters[(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoeSuboKeBk). They could probably literally just poof into smoke before a bullet ever fully breaks the skin.

                Wizards, one would think, could go flinging cars around whenever they wanted to, but they use death spells, even on muggles. Maybe they think it’s gauche to do something so mundane as dropping a rock on someone’s head, I couldn’t say. Jedi use the Force to throw things, but not to just crush someone’s head or rip it from their body. That would take a lot less force (so to speak) than lifting an X-wing, but they still use lightsabers.

                Jedi use the lightsaber specifically because they’re taught the Force isn’t for killing. They just love running around in bathrobes waving their glowbats around. (stop giggling. no seriously. stop giggling. Okay fine. giggle. a little. mace’s has a vibrating lenses.)

                The Sith have used the force to mow down entire armies, though. for example Maul running amok on a venator. still, the Sith use lightsabers as a symbol- invoking fear and terror, which further powers their dark-side natures. They also use lightsabers when it’s more efficient. (hurling rocks is… taxing, yes?)

                • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I think we can agree to disagree on the sneak attack/sniper from a half a kilometer away.

                  I did not know that about the Jedi, though. I really was going to write “Sith” but said fuck it because I figured someone with the wherewithal to cut a bad guy in half wouldn’t have a moral system that would prevent them from crushing a head. Plus, it was a callback to a long forgotten skit (I think it was on SNL, but it could have been any of those sketch shows) where the character would look at a person standing far away through his thumb and forefinger and make it look to him like he was crushing their heads.

                  The Jedi do use their force power to kill droids, though, and droids in the franchise certainly possess self-awareness, and are conscious beings who demonstrate every human behavior, so I have to wonder how that’s handled. I think I remember someone getting offended because he was called “just a droid.”

                  I kind of lost interest in the franchise after the first prequel, and so I’m obviously forgetting a lot. Plus, I skipped most of the recent movies (although I’m told the new series is really good, and I did enjoy the first season of Mando.

                  Anyway, thanks for teaching me something!

                  Plus, killing an Abrams with a rock is pretty funny. It reminds me of the Beverly Hill Cop scene where Eddie Murphy puts a banana in the guy’s tailpipe.

          • nintendiator@feddit.cl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sure but anyone can win any fight if they have position and prep time that the other party doesn’t: under the same logic Voldy can easily kill any sniper so long as he knows there’s one (and in a war, there is one). Reminder, at least in the movies he doesn’t actually need to aim for Crucio, and he can manually and literally laser crush a castle-wide energy barrier .

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The series would have ended much sooner if Harry had brought an AK47 to hogwarts

  • WastedJobe@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Isn’t arithmetic a class in Hogwarts and just a fancy word for maths (not a native speaker)? I think only Hermione takes it though and it’s only mentioned in the books.

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would trade maths knowledge for actual magic every single time. Maths basically was invented because of money & land, and that’s basically irrelevant with magic. Don’t need acres of land if you can have multiple wildlife reservations inside of a suitcase.

    It’s honestly one of the best things about Harry Potter series: it leaves as much muggle crap out of it as possible.

  • beefcat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “Arithmancy” is their name for math classes and is mentioned several times throughout the books. It is one of Hermione’s favorite subjects.

    At one point, the real world evil witch that is JK Rowling suggested that Arithmancy is like dviniation, but with math, saying they use numbers to predict the future. I take this to mean that the wizarding community discovered calculus independently from the rest of the world and mistook it for a new form of magic.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      In the games, arithmancy is portrayed as number puzzles that need to be solved.

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        number puzzles that need to be solved.

        In JK Rowling’s mind the number puzzles are things like “How many genders are there?”

        The correct answer, of course, is “Fuck you, JK Rowling, that’s how many.”

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          So crazy that a woman who liberally employed the Polyjuice Potion in her novels and had ghosts who would just wander through the restrooms to talk to you would take some of the most insanely conservative positions on changing your appearance or who should be allowed in the toilet.

          • Microw@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            She has been outspoken on the fact that her positions are basically due to personal trauma and nothing else

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Had to jog my memory, because I haven’t read these books in nearly 20 years.

              But yeah. I think the Rowling of the mid-90s was relatively chill and fairly progressive, given the tone of her writing. It wasn’t until she got Disney-fied (or, I guess, Warner Brothers’d) that she took a turn. The novels really take a dive in book 5 and her political opinions just get nastier and nastier after that.

              • Numhold@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                The Norberta reveal actually happens in Deathly Hallows. And frankly, I don‘t see a shift that is connected to the movies. What I actually observed was the overcompensation for criticism two books after the fact (remember Winky?) that Shaun described in his video essay.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Isekai is nothing new. Peter Pan, Alice in Wonderland, and The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe are all “isekai”. JK is a special kind of bad writer.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It is but I’m not sure why they called the author a witch instead of a shitty author. For whatever stupid detail you find, the writing is 5x more awkward

        Even a dragon would make more sense because of the wealth hoarding

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s just fun, it’s not serious or hard fantasy. It could be much worse, a lot of people read Ayn Rand and think its good.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    My wife, who is a big potter fan, told me they take traditional classes as well, but they are shown off screen as they aren’t interesting to the story.

    • beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      “Arithmancy” is what they call their math disciplines and it’s mentioned a fair bit in the books, though understandably never really shown in the movies.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pretty sure they explicitly talk about those kind of classes in the books. They don’t have scenes in them, but I remember Ron and Harry complaining about arithmetic, or mathematics, or something like that.