Hello internet users. Someone in my family is looking to buy a car and wanted some recommendations for a private one. They are looking to buy new, and need Android Auto and CarPlay. I know all new cars suck for privacy by default, but I was hoping someone here could offer some insight as to which cars can be made better and what cars offer the best experience with minimal compromises on privacy and no subscription bs. I also have a Home Assistant instance that they can access remotely if there are any cars that can work well with that.

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Privacy and cars are mutually exclusive. If you want privacy use public transport and pay in cash. With cars you have licence plate scanner, cameras and tollbooths everywhere (no to mention that most people drive with their phones on them). “They” will know where were you driving no matter what car you use. The question really is what data are you trying to hide and from who? The obvious thing to do is not to give your data to advertisers. Selling you shit is the whole point of most of the data collection. Just get extra phone and use some fake google account for android auto and you should be fine here. As for car companies all they will gather is some generic data about your driving habits but guess what? Everyone knows this already because driving is not private (again, if you want to hide this use public transport). So yeah, it would be nice for car companies to be more transparent about the data they gather and how they use it but it’s really not a big issue. If you’re paranoid about it then don’t drive. If you’re driving the data your car is leaking though analytics is not your biggest problem.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe they really want or need a car? They asked for the best car not for the most privacy friendly option in the world.

      You don’t have to go out and live on a farm in the mountains just because you care about privacy. There are degrees of privacy.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unlikely to find a new car without a calling home function.

    Definitely not one with car play.

    Best you can do is find the cell antenna port and put an RF sink on it (they’re used for testing radio output).

      • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The technical term is “dummy load”, most antennas are around 50ohm “impedance” which in an incredibly roundabout way means the antenna is indistinguishable from a 50ohm resistor at whatever frequency it’s tuned to…which means you can replace the antenna with a 50ohm resistor.

        This all assumes you care about leaving the radio functional (radio amplifiers will burn up if they can’t dissipate the energy they’re creating) and in most cases it’s probably fine to just cut the trace as close to the source chip as possible. That said, if the system is especially evil and well engineered it’ll throw errors in some cases so better to leave everything functional but unable to hear or transmit.

  • PeachMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t have a great answer to your question, but you might be able to find a relatively cheap car that isn’t “smart” and doesn’t have a touchscreen or anything. Do they make those anymore? Then, you could add an aftermarket stereo receiver to it, like some of the options in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t1GdI9UsEI

    Yes, that’s still a “smart” stereo but it’s NOT connected to any of the car manufacturer’s metrics or systems, right? So the separation makes it seem more privacy-friendly to me. I could be thinking about this incorrectly, but it seems logical to me. There might be some stereo receivers that are more private than others, but you’d have to do your own research for that.

  • joewilliams007@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just buy a used car. Look for low KM and good climate rating.

    Why care for privacy when in the end your using android auto or apple play?

    And a home assistant breaks the point even further.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Android Auto and CarPlay or Privacy. You won’t get both.

    Your use of ‘need’ is quite a stretch.

  • DJ WIREFRAUD@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    OP I got you. This is actually a fairly straightforward process, I’m in the middle of titling a vehicle in this manner currently.

    Form an anonymous New Mexico LLC before you do anything else, google it it’s not difficult. There are a million registered agents advertising their “anonymous” corporate filing, but make sure you file a New Mexico LLC- they don’t require member’s names to be public or registered with the state at all, meaning your HumanPerson Ventures LLC is completely, entirely separate from you.

    Should cost $50-$200 on average for that service. Some companies only charge you the state filing fee, which is $50 for NM. After you have your company, the rest is simple: just purchase a used car, from a private seller, for cash. Do not present ID when asked, stating that you’re purchasing on behalf of a company and as such will be titling the vehicle in the company’s name. When you do the title transfer, just write the name of the company where you’d put your name on the title.

    Wala, private car.

    EDIT: I see you weren’t asking for this sort of privacy, but I’m leaving this here regardless. It’s good information to have. This is for the “random guy with road rage knows a cop and runs your plate” threat model lol. Now, when your plate is run, it will show the company and the company address as the owner info.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    They are looking to buy new, and need Android Auto and CarPlay

    I was active on an automotive forum around the time when that sort of thing started to be seen as a “need” by car salesmen and some of their more enthusiastic customers. The big new thing was “infotainment” and it seemed like the whole industry was insisting we’d all soon see how essential this stuff was. I was disdainful of the idea then, and have only become more so. Cars should have an AM/FM radio receiver, and aside from lights and a horn that’s all they need for communications.

    That’s not the answer you’re looking for, but it seems reasonably on-topic here. If you must get a new car, the easiest route to having it not spy on you as much as it can all the time is to make sure it doesn’t have a SIM card (or remove the one it does have) and never connect your phone to it in any way except perhaps via a 3.5mm audio jack.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t understand why everyone seems to be latching on to carplay and android auto in this thread as if it’s the car stealing your data. All carplay and android auto do is take a video feed from your phone an display it on the car’s screen. You still have the privacy issues, but it’s not the car doing anything, they’re the same as if you had a dumb car and google maps up on your phone in a phone mount.

      • d00phy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Most are missing the point. You’re right, running AA or CP is akin to just using your phone with a vent mount, albeit arguably safer. The privacy issues come with things like OnStar and similar services that connect back to the manufacturer. As someone already pointed out it doesn’t sound like there’s a way to remove OnStar, but some others might be removeable, or not available in cheaper models.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Your faith in the safety of allowing your car and your phone the opportunity to share data with each other is touching, but until I see the source code I will remain unconvinced that it isn’t a bad idea.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bluetooth connection is a must too, but it doesn’t need to access my contacts. Just as a music player or headset.

    • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think if you remove internet connection from the car and use it with a phone with graphene os is it would be OK but I could be wrong.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you’re using the android Auto app then I don’t see how the OS even matters. You can turn off Google location services but I’ve never tried that with android Auto.

        You have to sacrifice something. It’s generally not possible to use cloud-based services while maintaining total privacy - at least not in a way that’s convenient.

        Here’s what you can do - get a car with minimal tech built into it’s head unit. Get a new head unit and get a car audio shop to swap it out for you. This will void your car warranty if it’s new, but some HUs have navigation built in (not Internet dependent ) and support simple Bluetooth .

        If you want full Android Auto capability then idk if it’s even possible to meet all your stated requirements.

  • trippingonthewire@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Couldn’t you ask the guys at the dealership to remove the router and such from the car? Say you don’t want internet. If so, I’d say that’s the best you’d get in terms of new cars.

  • Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sorry, but I have bad news for you. Privacy in major car brands no longer exists.

    You don’t say where your family member lives, but you might look into smaller regional brands that focus on cheap cars for less overdeveloped areas of the world. Be aware the tradeoff is probably in safety features.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are things you can do though.

      GM for example you cannot remove OnStar from their vehicles. But with my Subaru removing the starlink module was a ~20 minute procedure. You’ll need an aftermarket harness in order to maintain the front speakers.

  • LoveSausage@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Would love some info on where all this shit is located in the car. Someone should make a database of the different cars and how to block shit

  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m just leaving a comment here because if there is a positive answer to this, I also want to know. I think we’re just hosed as far as cars go.

  • LoveSausage@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Dacia, least bad one. Made a dedicated phone for the car without personal info as well. Rooted calyx OS , microG, organic maps and spottube. No simcard and VPN on WiFi. Not sure how much is still leaked but a lot better at least.