Trolls have flooded X with graphic Taylor Swift AI fakes::Fake sexually explicit images of Taylor Swift have been circulating on X over the last day in the latest example of the proliferation of AI-generated pornography.

  • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh my god! That’s disgusting! Naked pics online? Where? Where were they posted? I want to avoid seeing them at all costs!

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is it really that necessary to creep on someone without their consent? Porn exists, there are lots of women who are happy (at least consent) for you to look at them naked.

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You stupid bitch.

          No guys it’s just a reference, it’s a joke, how could you not have known? I only made a comment that looks exactly like a real statement someone would make and made no effort to tie it to the referenced material.

      • decerian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The above post is referencing/quoting a line from the show “It’s always sunny in Philadelphia”, which is why people up voting it

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve got a lot of quotes and references from that show, notably pepe siliva, trash man, and day man. Definitely don’t have this one rolling around.

          This quote, without any level of trying to tie it to the referenced material is not a joke, it’s just a statement. There is no indication this isn’t just their opinion which is why they’ve been downvoted.

    • AreaKode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No, I’m not even gonna look for those nude photos.

      I might.

      I might, though.

      I might.

    • Tremble@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is an abomination!

      If you find the links let me know so I can block the website. Until then, I won’t stop until I find this disgusting filth so i don’t accidentally click on it. Ever!

  • lnxtx@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Our Rules

    1. Only tech related content.

    I’m asking again to clarify this rule.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Anything that happens online, with machines, near machines, that were done with a phone in someone’s pocket or within 100 yards of a phone, anywhere under telephone wires, anything that’s happened since the advent of the printing press…

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sorry for Taylor. She doesn’t deserve that. Nobody does frankly. However, I’m sort of glad it is Taylor because if anyone has the money to sue the perpetrators and X into the ground it’s her.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    One of the most prominent examples on X attracted more than 45 million views, 24,000 reposts, and hundreds of thousands of likes and bookmarks before the verified user who shared the images had their account suspended for violating platform policy.

    In some regions, the term “Taylor Swift AI” became featured as a trending topic, promoting the images to wider audiences.

    X’s policies regarding synthetic and manipulated media and nonconsensual nudity both explicitly ban this kind of content from being hosted on the platform.

    In response, fans have responded by flooding hashtags used to circulate the images with messages that instead promote real clips of Swift performing to hide the explicit fakes.

    The responsibility of preventing fake images from spreading often falls to social platforms — something that can be difficult to do under the best of circumstances and even harder for a company like X that has hollowed out its moderation capabilities.

    The company is currently being investigated by the EU regarding claims that it’s being used to “disseminate illegal content and disinformation” and is reportedly being questioned regarding its crisis protocols after misinformation about the Israel-Hamas war was found being promoted across the platform.


    The original article contains 420 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 54%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    elon should be ecstatic that there is no viable scaled alternative to his site because I am sure pissing off probably one of if not the most powerful woman on the planet and her legions of fans is not good for business.

    and because there’s no alternative he’s not incentivised to do anything about it so the problem will persist.

    • Bananigans@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      In some parallel universe these events trigger the pop idols fury. Birthed from the canals of the very ai vaginas meant to besmirch Miss Swift, the new social platform, Taytter, arises. As a place for Swifties to speak to their spuds, the new social media juggernaut rises to power, providing an oasis of reasonably moderated media, while X rusts away in the social media wasteland it’s platform helped perpetuate.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You kid, but if Taylor swift just talked about a new Twitter alternative, especially any time soon, Twitter would be kaput.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I still do not see what the difference is between AI generated porn and photoshopping one person’s face onto a different person’s naked body.