After scuttling a months-long search for a new host, the Paramount Global network said it had enlisted Jon Stewart, who presided over the late-night mainstay’s most popular era, to serve as its host on Monday nights throughout the 2024 election cycle and to run the program. He is expected to oversee the program through 2025. Various “Daily Show” correspondents will host the program Tuesday through Thursday nights, and Jen Flanz, the current executive producer, will continue her duties on the show.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I did link that at the end, after a quick Google. I don’t have AppleTV and never saw The Problem with Jon Stewart, so I was unaware of this, but the fact that he defended Chappelle at first was a bad look and to my knowledge he hasn’t amended his statement on Chappelle’s defense.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Stewart didn’t defend Chapelle, Stewart opposed censorship and penalties with one reason being Stewart being called antisemitic for criticizing how Israel treats Palestinians. Note this is from 2022 and I’m pretty sure Stewart still thinks Israel’s actions are terrible.

          https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2022/11/jon-stewart-defends-dave-chappelle-controversial-snl-monologue

          During his appearance on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert on Tuesday, Stewart pushed back on the belief that Chappelle “normalized antisemitism” with his 15-minute commentary that involved Kanye West’s and Kyrie Irving’s recent scandals. “I don’t know if you’ve been on comment sections on most news articles, but it’s pretty fucking normal. As you know, it’s incredibly normal,” Stewart began. “But the one thing I will say is, I don’t believe that censorship and penalties are the way to end antisemitism or to not gain understanding. I don’t believe in that, and I think it’s the wrong way for us to approach it.”

          Stewart, who was present at the Los Angeles comedy event where Chappelle was attacked onstage after his set in May, agreed with the comic that “it shouldn’t be this hard to talk about things,” adding, “I’m called antisemitic because I’m against Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. I’m called other things from other people based on other opinions that I have…Whether it be comedy or discussion or anything else, if we don’t have the wherewithal to meet each other with what’s reality, then how do we move forward?… If we all just shut it down, then we retreat to our little corners of misinformation and it metastasizes. And the whole point of all this is to not let it metastasize and to get it out in the air and talk about it.”

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’m talking about something that preceded that and is about Stewart defending Chappelle’s anti-trans jokes and positions.

            https://web.archive.org/web/20211022145129/https://nypost.com/2021/10/22/jon-stewart-defends-decent-dave-chappelle-amid-scandal/

            Chappelle has been under fire since the release of “The Closer” earlier this month, in which he declared himself to be a “trans-exclusionary radical feminist” (TERF).

            “They canceled JK Rowling — my God. Effectually, she said gender was fact, the trans community got mad as s–t, they started calling her a TERF … I’m Team TERF,” Chappelle quipped in the stand-up special.

            Stewart defended Chappelle over the anti-trans jokes he made in The Closer.

            Speaking with TMZ, he described Chappelle as “warm,” “wise” and “decent.”

            “Look, if this spurs a conversation where people get more on the same page in terms of understanding, that’d be great, but I know his intention is never hurtful — like, he’s just not that kind of person,” Stewart said.

            “And if it is [hurtful], it’s certainly unintentional … He’s really a good man.”

            Stewart and Chappelle have been friends for years, and the pair performed together in Ireland back in 2018.

            Stewart specifically defended Chappelle after Chappelle referred to himself as a TERF on his standup special.___

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Yeah it would mean a lot to me if Jon Stewart could just say “Okay, yeah, Chappelle is officially being hurtful on purpose.”

                Because he fucking is. Guy basically thinks trans people should have to suffer the indignities black people did to get respect… because he doesn’t realize they fucking did already. But beyond whether they did or not already, does Chappelle really want to fucking play Oppression Olympics? Fuck me man, I thought we all deserved respect because of human rights, not because we were supposed to suffer under abuse first. That’s some real Boomer shit, “It was bad for me, so I better see it being bad for you before I respect you.”

                • snooggums@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Chapelle has completely shit the bed over thr last decade by switching from someone who had clever takes on racial issues with some shitty takes on other subjects to leaning entirely into spewing hate while crying about nonexistent cancel culture.

                  Yes, Chapelle wants to play oppression Olympics while excusing his hot takes because he had ‘one trans friend’. I forced myself to watch most of his Closer special to see if it was as bad as people claimed and it was, so from here on out I will just assume the worst things said about him are probably true.

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jon is how I got sucked into US politics all those years ago. He was amazing. Look at me now, knowing things about stuff and all. Thanks Jon!

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is the show itself only airing on Mondays, or is that just the only night that Jon will host?

    Also, as excited as I am to get him back, I hope he didn’t let himself get bullied out of retirement. He had definitely earned it.

    • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think he got bullied out of retirement, I think running the sanctuary full time, while fulfilling, might only meet his needs 80% of the time and he still wants to express himself creatively.

      And plus, animal sanctuaries are expensive to run.

      • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        He didn’t retire, really. His show on Apple+ was canceled a few months ago.

        I was actually wondering if he would wind up back at home because of it.

        • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, his original retirement was from the daily show to have an animal sanctuary with his wife.

          Apple gave him a stupid amount of money to come out of retirement.

    • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      He will host Mondays and Executive Produce. Other correspondents will host T, W, and Th.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’ll never not believe that if Jon was running the Daily Show for the 2016 election season, Trump wouldn’t have been elected.

      Either way, Zelenskyy proved what a satirical comedian with good character can do on the world stage. Wish Jon would just run for office already…

      Side note: Mehdi Hasan has left MSNBC… Apart from Jon, I can think of nobody else more qualified to run the Daily Show.

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think Zelensky is a good example of anything lol his government has been the most right-wing and authoritarian government in Ukraine in recent memory. They banned all left-wing parties for goodness sake….

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Those of us who remember the Orange Revolution understand the incredible political attack that Ukraine has been under for decades. Russia has expended unprecedented expenditure understanding democracy in order to develop mechanisms to undermine it.

          It’s extremely unfortunate the reality in which former Soviet states exist. While it’s distasteful, it’s certainly necessary given a reality that westerners barely understand… Which is kind of shocking to me given the outcome of Jan 6.

          I think when the war is over, it would be appropriate for him to not even run. Hard men make hard decisions when under existential threat. I’m glad Ukraine had a Churchill when Ukraine needed a Churchill… But when that time comes for a peacetime leader, it doesn’t mean he wasn’t the right man in the right place at the right time.

          It is from a position of privilege and ignorance that we criticize the necessary actions of wartime leaders.

          • novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You think necessary actions is absorbing and legitimising far-right and Nazi militias? Literally banning and arresting left-wing activists? Kidnapping men in the middle of the night to conscript them? Bombing indiscriminately civilians on the East? Bro fuck off.

            Churchill was a genocidal racist maniac btw, if he’s your idea of a hero, I understand where you’re coming from. And again, bro fuck right the fuck off.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Right I don’t get what’s so hard to comprehend.

                In America we have an arguably bigger base of right-wing nazi extremists. The Base, Oathkeepers, 3%ers, Proud Boys, etc.

                … And you know what? If someone invaded our country that may actually be the only time my bleeding heart leftist would share a fox hole with them out of common goals.

                That doesn’t make USA a nazi state lol. But of course, let’s not pretend this was ever a legitimate argument by Russia in the first place.

            • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Assuming you’re talking about the Azov Batallion, if you are fighting a war for your country’s survival and you have a rabid band of ethnonationalists, who clearly suck in terms of their views and beliefs, but are otherwise willing to die to protect your country, why wouldn’t you let them?

              • novibe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                … I’m talking about right-sector, azov, national corps etc. They were brought into leadership and legitimized as part of the national guard and army. That is inexcusable. You would really side with Nazis to defend “your country”? After the war is over, Ukraine will become an ultra-right wing state. The state apparatus will have been completely overtaken by these militias and groups.

                That’s like saying the UK should’ve legitimized and absorbed the British Fascist Party during WW2, made Oswald Mosley the minister of defense (which was done in Ukraine…) etc. That’s insane, but it does show how you liberals see the world. Scratch a liberal etc etc

                • lennybird@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Azov et. al., literally make up <1% of the total UAF. lol what are you talking about? These people just have a common enemy and it’s all-hands-on-deck to oust the foreign invader. The same thing even happened in WWII America when pro-Nazi sects of our society took up arms against Japan.

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              You really seem misinformed. Wagner has more association with nazism. Even Putin’s right-hand man, his modern Rasputin if you will, is a literal dyed-in-the-wool neo-nazi who wrote the plans Putin is literally carrying out.

              Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is of no difference than Hitler’s justification to invade Poland “for ethnic Germans.”

              At the end of the day, the Jewish leader Zelenskyy who lost family in the Holocaust, disrupted the sockpuppetry that was originally taking place in Ukraine. As the war continued, the remnants of corruption have continued to be weeded out, though still some remain.

              • novibe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                You really seem misinformed. There are Nazis in Russia, nobody said there weren’t. But Russia didn’t absorb the Nazis into their government and state apparatus, gave them leadership positions in ministries etc.

                And Nazi Germany invaded Poland because of Lebensraum, basically German Manifest Destiny. Russia invaded Ukraine because of NATO and the color revolution in 2014.

                • lennybird@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Yes Russia did, what are you smoking? I just told you Putin’s right-hand man is a nazi. You just ignored that conveniently lol. RT, the Kremlin mouthpiece, spouts nazi propaganda on the daily.

                  What absorption of nazism in Ukraine are you talking about and when, specifically?

                  No, Russia didn’t even Ukraine “because NATO,” considering Ukraine wasn’t in NATO and intentionally didn’t join to stop Russian aggression. Yet Russia did so anyway.

                  Ironically the DEFENSIVE Alliance that is NATO would’ve saved many lives of women and children from the brutal Russian invasion because Russia knows they’d get demolished by NATO.

                  You are clearly drinking far too much Russian vodka, my friend.

                  Finally, please learn your history regarding WWII:

                  Hitler sought to use this as casus belli, a reason for war, reverse the post-1918 territorial losses, and on many occasions had appealed to German nationalism, promising to “liberate” the German minority still in the Corridor, as well as Danzig.

                  But you’re right: this was just a convenient excuse. Just as Russia is using it as a convenient excuse for their own sort of Lebensraum, basically Russian Manifest Destiny. Or wait – did you not read Putin’s 5,000 word essay where he spells this out…?

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve thought the same thing ever since that dipshit got elected president in 2016.

        Stewart’s presence in the media was real and impactful. Really wish he had stayed a few more years.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Idk if so many people remember this now, but watching him on Crossfire absolutely shut them down was so satisfying. Then the show just happens to get cancelled not long after for ‘unrelated reasons’, like they didn’t get destroyed and quit in shame.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh yes I remember that fondly. Crazy to think that bumbling bow-tie dipshit would go on to have one of the biggest conservative followings and basically be a Kremlin mouthpiece. Fuck Carlson.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The only way this would get any better is of he can get an interview with Donald Trump. That’d be like bringing the pig to a slaughter house

  • shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Noah left? Huh. Makes sense i guess, he felt better during the pandemic when it felt like he was hosting a podcast instead of a show. Eh probably not going to watch anyway, i haven’t even turned my television on since early pandemic.

  • ConstableJelly@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    They’ve got a really talented bench of people, I’m surprised this has gone on so long (though I am far from a regular viewer). My vote would have gone to Jordan Klepper, who I think has both the intelligence and sincere anger that made Jon Stewart the cultural force he was on the show. My theory is that the execs saw him as too much of a risk after his previous (unfortunately) failed solo outings.

    • nicetriangle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah that’s a pretty good take. Klepper’s on the street interviews with MAGA idiots and the like are the most Daily Show feeling bits of content I’ve seen since Stewart left.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I actually liked the rotating host format tbh. I feel like it kept the show fresh and fit well with the post-Stewart vibe where it was more about the content and writing than the host.