• SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lol, and do you think it had to be the Americans to stop them. Or that they cared before they got attacked. Or that they would do it again if the us left (I know as an American, you have 0 understanding of history so let me tell you: the Americans left the people who did all that in charge of Japan because it was convenient for them).

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are you implying that there’s something inherent in Japanese people that would cause them to revert back to committing atrocities and that the only thing stopping them is the USA dominating them while the USA commits atrocities? Of course that would also be coupled with the belief that the atrocities the USA commits are not inherent in the American people, right?

      • FellowArmadello@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s nothing against the people of Japan, but their geography. They need to import their oil and lots of other stuff, so if they didn’t have major global allies and markets, the country would need to lash out.
        Obviously the first question you asked is loaded, so I won’t answer it. Any atrocities committed by American actions are obviously bad, but you’d have to be more specific about what atrocities for me to answer.

        • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          So Japan is a risk because of resource scarcity? Someone really needs to get on dominating Europe.