• CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really dislike the new look. The first one had a simple but sleek aesthetic, this one just looks cheap and generic.

  • Canadian_Cabinet @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can’t say I’m excited. I remember how badly they butchered the original game when they bought it, not to mention that art style isn’t great

  • Shirasho@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    They still haven’t fixed the major bugs after how many years in the first game. I don’t think I can trust them with a second.

  • yZmHGnHnaB@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really liked the first game but I can’t say I’m confident that this will be too enjoyable, unfortunately.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was so excited for Cities: Skylines II, and it is a shell of the former game. So many systems seem to fake the economy, and it also feels impossible to make your city fail.

    Waiting until I see evidence of a good game post-release before I board any kind of hype train.

    • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I still haven’t bought that, and looks like I won’t be for a while at least, maybe never if it doesn’t pan out. I was so excited for Victoria 3 but reading the reviews they indicate that it’s also a shell of the former game. Waiting until the game is fully released before letting in any hype has served me well lately.

      • Vic3 certainly isn’t a shell of Vic2. It’s a considerably more complex and interesting game.

        There are however some frustrating and obtuse mechanics, particularly related to warfare. It’s not even that bad once you get into it properly, but as a new player it’s definitely a bit frustrating and it’s definitely different from what players were used to from Vic2.

        • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ah, that’s good to hear! I myself haven’t played Victoria 2, I’ve played EU4, CK2 and CK3 a lot and was really excited about focusing on economy and population rather than map painting in Vic3. I saw the lackluster reviews on release and beyond and assumed it just missed the mark like so many sequels do. I’ll check it out some more. Thanks for your input!

  • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think the artstyle is ok in a vacuum. It does look bad if you look at it as a direct sequel of prison architect 1. As for paradox, it would be a new low for them if they managed to fuck up the performance for this game by releasing it early, the only problem I can really see are bugs and they usually aren’t gamebreaking (for the pdx games I’ve played at launch - c:s2 and vic3). I just hope it isn’t treated as a cash grab by the higher ups. As long as they don’t release it before it is ready the game will be fine, but we know paradox will crunch the developers to release early. I’m mainly just worried about the dlc.

  • EtzBetz@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not sure whether to support this, after they just turned off servers of PA1.