Not really sure what to put here…I usually put relevant excerpts, but that got this post deleted for doing that

  • hakase@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Seems like it wasn’t for “exposing animal cruelty” so much as it was for, y’know, trespassing, breaking and entering, theft, etc.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      For the sake of argument… if I hear you beating your dog, should I break down the door to stop it?

      Yes, I could call 911, but by the time they arrive the sounds would stop and they’d have no probable cause. I could go in and steal the dog or even just record a video right now. What is the ethical thing to do?

  • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s not illegal to “expose” animal cruelty in California, and no one has ever been charged with doing so. Animal cruelty is prosecuted all the time in California. The headline is stupid. The headline is wrong.

    • Striker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You an idiot. Read beyond the headline and you’ll see that in California activists are being charged for being attention to deplorable conditions in animal farms yet the farms they exposed have no charges against them.

      • mob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        was convicted of two counts of misdemeanor trespass and one count of felony conspiracy to trespass last week

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          felony conspiracy to trespass

          Anyone know what the difference is between a misdemeanor conspiracy to trespass and a felony conspiracy to trespass?

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is weird just how secretive the slaughterhouses are.

    I don’t usually discuss this sort of thing very much with carnists IRL, because I tend to find their “arguments” and their positions rather tired and boring and in general completely irrational. The “but where do you get your protein?” type of questions or “I tried being a vegan/vegetarian but it didn’t agree with me because of my special DNA due to my ancestry of northern Europeans or whatever” conspiracy theories are especially fun. It’s usually the carnists that go out of their way to be activists about their choices, not me.

    I’ll usually answer direct questions and leave it at that. I find there is a certain type of carnist that get especially defensive (almost always men suffering from toxic masculinity) around the very presence of veg*ns and want to get into arguments, especially while eating.

    But there have been times where I’ve asked why slaughterhouses have so much secrecy in some of these “conversations” where the carnist just won’t drop the topic and I’ve noticed that gives them some pause. At least for a small glimmer of time. I think it is because these carnist activists are the ones with the most amount of guilt and they know that most (normal) people don’t want to witness what goes on in slaughterhouses…

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Laura Passaglia, the Sonoma County Superior Court judge who presided over the trial, barred Hsiung from showing most evidence of animal cruelty, depriving him of the ability to show his motives for entering the farms.

    What a bitch.