• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh nice, so people are spending $30,000 min on any new car AND it will record and pass on everything you do in it? Oh and depending on the car manufacturer you may have to pay a subscription for remote entry and heated seats. Its almost as if you are paying for something that you don’t control, don’t own and now works directly to steal information from you. Cool. Cool.

  • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t want to sound like a corporate shill, but this sounds necessary for handsfree functions. To read an incoming text read aloud, there would have to be a copy stored. If one was paranoid, they could just avoid pairing their phone.

    • Kindness@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Washington Privacy Act (WPA).

      Plaintiffs’ operative complaint alleged that their vehicles’ infotainment systems download and permanently store all text messages and call logs from Plaintiffs’ cellphones without their consent.

      […]

      The district court properly dismissed Plaintiffs’ claim for failure to satisfy the WPA’s statutory injury requirement. See WASH. REV. CODE § 9.73.060. To succeed at the pleading stage of a WPA claim, a plaintiff must allege an injury to “his or her business, his or her person, or his or her reputation.” Id. Contrary to Plaintiffs’ argument, a bare violation of the WPA is insufficient to satisfy the statutory injury requirement.

      • TauZero@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brb, gonna wiretap the judge’s house. It’s not a crime as long as I don’t act on the information I hear so there is no injury.