• KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    For what it’s worth, MX Linux is the only distro that runs on netbooks that only support 32Bit UEFI and ships the required non-free firmware.

    Fedora is basically similar to Debian but for desktop users who want newer packages and don’t mind some bugs.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fedora is basically Debian

      ಠ_ಠ

      Lots of things are “basically Debian” (Ubuntu, Mint, etc.). Similarly, lots of things are “basically Fedora” (Red Hat, CentOS, etc.). But Fedora and Debian are themselves separate base branches of the Linux distro family multitree and thus couldn’t be further apart!

      • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ubuntu is a derivative distro. Mint is a derivative of a derivative.
        Fedora is “basically Debian” (I should have said similar to Debian) in the sense that they’re both original, community-maintained distros, use similar package managers, and require a similar level of skill.

        • mateomaui@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Mint is a derivative of a derivative.

          Not if you install the debian base version instead of the ubuntu based one.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m just used to thinking of Fedora and Debian as the two major different kinds of Linux (with smaller distro families like Slackware and Gentoo being kinda off to the side). I mean, yeah, they’re both general-purpose and community-maintained, but that applies to most distros. Also, if apt and yum are similar, then so is every other package manager. They don’t even use the same package format, after all.

          I get what you’re saying, but I just don’t categorize distros that way.

          • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m just used to thinking of Fedora and Debian as the two major different kinds of Linux (with smaller distro families like Slackware and Gentoo being kinda off to the side).

            Everyone always forgets about OpenSUSE :(

            • spauldo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              It never caught on in the states.

              IIRC it was originally based on Red Hat (back when Red Hat Linux was a thing), wasn’t it?

                • spauldo@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  So it did. That’s interesting.

                  It was the fact that they used RPMs that made me think they were a Red Hat derivative. I didn’t care for Red Hat (I ran Slackware back then, switching to Debian around Hamm) so I never gave them a chance. Pity.

            • nyan@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I would say it’s more that we kind of don’t know where it belongs in the family tree. There are two big families (Debian, Fedora), three small families (Slackware, Gentoo, Arch), a bunch of singletons . . . and OpenSUSE, which could belong to either the Fedora or the Slackware family depending on the criteria applied.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      for desktop users who want newer packages

      If you want newer packages, use backports or run Debian Testing. I used testing on servers for probably 10 years without issues. I don’t want to spend as much time dealing with the occasional breakages these days though, so I’m running stable everywhere.