• Adori@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but for long term growth is not ideal, the tracks will do a better job in long run.

    No matter the math, trains move more people, faster and safely. What you should use for your argument is that it’s easier and better to low capacity roads in rural areas (low population) than building trains to replace the car everywhere. Either way there is no argument against trains from city to city or a metro. Cars get out competed there.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t disagree, but we shouldn’t be pulling numbers out of our asses that are orders of magnitude different from the real figures.