• nesc@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    This pyramid visualisation doesn’t work for me, unless you read time starting with seconds.

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I just use millis since epoch

    (Recently learned that this isn’t accurate because it disguises leap seconds. The standard was fucked from the start)

      • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Don’t you mean: “Right there! Stop you, I’m going to.”

        Yoda-ass date structure.

        What day, of what month, of what year is it? It’s ordered by importance dammit!

        • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          25th of July, 2024 is confusing?

          There’s no ambiguity with the format, since it’s impossible to mix up month and day

          • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            No. But 2024, the 25th of July is clumsy both spoken and written.

            July 25th, 2024 is okay but gives off middle child vibes.

            25th of July, 2024 is ordered small to big, rolls off the tongue and when written nicely seperates both sets of numbers for ease of readability.

            The only other alternative I will accept is Julian dates. Today is Day 26 of 2025.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              July 25th, 2024 is okay but gives off middle child vibes.

              The fuck does that even mean? This is literally how people speak dates out loud.

          • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            yes, when the month is written non-numerically (and the year is written with four digits) there is no ambiguity.

            but, the three formats in OP’s post are all about writing things numerically.

            In some contexts, writing out the full month name can be clearer (at least for speakers of the language you’re writing in), but it takes more (and a variable amount of) space and the strings cannot be sorted without first parsing them into date objects.

            Anywhere you want or need to write a date numerically, ISO-8601 is obviously much better and should always be used (except in the many cases where the stupid formats are required by custom or law).

  • azi@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Hot take: 2025-Jan-27 is better than 2025-01-27 in monolingual contexts.

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    In one work report, I recorded the date as “1/13/25”, “13/1/25” and “13JAN2025”

    I have my preference, but please for the love of all that is fluffy in the universe, just stick to one format…

  • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Maybe in programming or technical documentation, but no, when I check the date I want to know the day and the month, beyond that, it’s all unnecessary information for everyday use, and we have it right in Europe.

    You can’t change my mind. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      These people are just too far into the ISO rabbit hole. I completely agree with you that DD.MM.YYYY is the best format for everyday use.

      • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        the “best” format for everyday use is each individual person’s personal preference.

        you may be more used to DDMMYYYY due to culture, language, upbringing, and usage. in the same vein, i am more used to YYYYMMDD because in chinese we go 年月日 (year-month-day), and it makes organizing files and spreadsheet entries much more intuitive anyways.

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Well in that case people should stop complaining about us wanting to use DD.MM.YYYY it’s perfectly fine and the only format that should be shot on sight is MM.DD.YYYY

    • lurklurk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      You can’t change my mind.

      That’s not a good thing. That attitude limits you from improving how you do things because you’ve gotten emotionally attached to some arbitrary … never mind. Have a nice day.

      • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        You can do 1-26

        I don’t know what this means, also I don’t have to adhere to anything, the European format works perfectly well for me, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • azolus@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          2025-01-26 so it’s 26.01. It’s easy to look up. All you need to know is that the date goes YYY-MM-DD (year -> month -> day). You do the same thing when you write 26.01 instead of 26.01.2025, since you are just dropping information about the year.

          Starting out with “you can’t change my mind” is fine but then don’t argue for your point with arguments that can easily be debunked. Use whichever format you like better but don’t pretend that’s more than personal preference at that point.

          The big argument for the iso date-time format is lexicographic ordering. If you don’t care about that, then don’t use it.

          Just as a side-note: some european countries were in fact considering switching to the iso date-time format but didn’t because it would have been an inconvenience to people already familiar with different formats. Basically the “it’s better but people prefer the older format” thing we have going on in the comment sections right now.

          Cheers

          • CM400@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            It’s better but people prefer the older format

            The metric system has entered the chat.

          • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            don’t argue for your point with arguments that can easily be debunked.

            I literally said I don’t know what a thing means (and now that you’ve explained, it’s a useless instruction to give me, since all it does is add extra steps for those of us already perfectly happy with the European format lmfao), and made no assertion beyond my personal preference, kindly get off your fucking high horse.

        • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          1-26 or 01/26 is a way of writing the month and day. in this particular example, it is describing the 26th day of January, or January 26. the year is omitted in this instance because, in this context, it is a way of demonstrating how a month and day can still be conveyed in order of significance without fully adhering to ISO 8601 guidelines.

          • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            So it’s just adding the American format (which categorically does not demonstrate how a month and day can still be conveyed in order of significance, but literally the opposite) in to the mix and not providing any help or making things any simpler lol

            Thanks for explaining, but if the person who introduced the 1-26 concept in to the conversation (and could have easily just said “MM/DD” to make their point significantly clearer), or the other person with their lecture are actually trying to change my, or anyone else’s mind, or make their personal preference more appealing to others, this (making things more complicated, when they are already perfectly straightforward, just not how they like it) isn’t the fucking way to do it lmmfao

      • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        just nitpicking, but technically ISO 8601 does not (currently) permit the omission of the year.

        if information is to be omitted, it must be done in ascending order of significance, so you can omit, in order, seconds, minutes, hours, and days.

        (if you omit the month, that’s just the year left so why bother with ISO 8601 lmao)