He generally shows most of the signs of the misinformation accounts:

  • Wants to repeatedly tell basically the same narrative and nothing else
  • Narrative is fundamentally false
  • Not interested in any kind of conversation or in learning that what he’s posting is backwards from the values he claims to profess

I also suspect that it’s not a coincidence that this is happening just as the Elon Musks of the world are ramping up attacks on Wikipedia, specially because it is a force for truth in the world that’s less corruptible than a lot of the others, and tends to fight back legally if someone tries to interfere with the free speech or safety of its editors.

Anyway, YSK. I reported him as misinformation, but who knows if that will lead to any result.

Edit: Number of people real salty that I’m talking about this: Lots

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This unactionable vaguepost is what suffices as a YSK?

    Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK

    Why should I know this, OP?

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The person claiming every piece of negative information about russia and china and other similar places is a usa psyop is now quoting rules against a post trying to make people aware of misinformation?! Color me surprised.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Oh hello mr Russian-pretending-to-be-American.

      You’ve never answered why you pretend to be American while at the same time clearly supporting Russia and spreading Russian propaganda.

      Are you such a weak-willed American you’ve bought into Russian propaganda?

      Isn’t it annoying when you can’t just delete my comment and ban me like you alway do, mr Pro-Russian?

      (This guys has said things like “reality has a well known Russian propaganda bias”.)

      He’s pro-Russian, and will never answer that particular question despite being ready to lie about everything else, because he knows even a clear lie of “I hate Putin” written by him in the context of him being American could be reason enough for him to accidentally fall out of a window. Because Russia is a shithole autocracy.

      This guy never states shit, goes around spamming wannabe good looking lists of links of shit that’s incredibly easily shown to be utter shit, but because there’s so much, it’ll always just diverge from the actual point.

      It’s got a name.

      An outgrowth of Soviet propaganda techniques, the firehose of falsehood is a contemporary model for Russian propaganda under Russian President Vladimir Putin.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood

      Spreading FUD everywhere.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty,_and_doubt

      All you need to do to prove this is try to get him to answer whether he’s pro-Russian or not. Not a hard question, yet he just can’t manage answering it.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I replied to the person directly with why it isn’t true, and I reported them with an actionable report.

      I wasn’t sure about the ethics of brigading or linking directly at the person, but presumably anyone who cares can find them pretty easily, and anyone who reads this and then also reads the misinformation, will be able to see the connection and make their own decision about whether I am speaking truly.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        anyone who cares can find them pretty easily

        I care, I have found nothing similar to what you’re discussing.

        anyone who reads this and then also reads the misinformation, will be able to see the connection

        I just read a post that said Wikipedia was the best website on the internet, was that the misinformation? Someone else donated, was that misinformation? People have shared a variety of thoughts around Wikipedia, most of them are positive, but some are negative.

        Negative doesn’t mean wrong. Negative doesn’t mean misinformation. It might be, but it isn’t certain.

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You are asking weighted nuance from Lemmy. You might as well squish rocks to get water.

          This post just reads as it could have been a mod report and that’s about it. Looks like outrage for the sake of outrage

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I just read a post that said Wikipedia was the best website on the internet, was that the misinformation?

          No.

          Someone else donated, was that misinformation?

          No.

          Wikipedia is only a source for truth for people that either don’t know what it’s protecting or are in the genocidal cult it is protecting.

          And then I asked the person about this genocidal cult and got no response whatsoever, almost as if it was, not just a negative thing, but a wild and inaccurate thing said apparently with not even a little pretense that it corresponded to the truth. Was that misinformation? Yes!

          Hope this helps.

          • MimicJar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 hours ago

            So the “other” thread links here, so I’m going to link to them. https://lemmy.world/post/23535522

            I think that thread would have been a much better thing to post. However this isn’t some secret project, this is a single account that is obviously labeled, so this whole post is just a silly.

            YSK conspiracy theorists exist.