• Dupree878@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Avoid the nervous system, internal organs that aren’t heart, lungs or liver, lymphatic and glandular systems and you eliminate prion disease worries

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    When the German cannibal Armin Meiwes was on trail, it was actually a legal conundrum. Meiwes’ victim had explicitly consented to being killed and eaten, even dictating how he wanted to have it done to himself. So was it murder or more of a convoluted version of assisted suicide (“killing on demand” is the legal term in Germany)? He was eventually convicted of manslaughter and got a prison sentence of eight and a half years, a few years later changed to a sentence for life.

  • Alice@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I remember seeing someone get a callout post on Twitter for saying they don’t see an ethical problem with cannibalism if it’s consensual. That’s all they said, and they got dogpiled so hard that they apologized and went to therapy for their “unnatural thoughts”, and the callouts continued.

    Unless several Twitter users plan to give them unrestricted access to their corpse soon, I don’t see why that’s callout-worthy.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Did they actually go to therapy or did they just say that to try and save face? (Not that I believe they deserved that level of push back necessarily.)

      • Alice@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s a good question. I kinda hope they didn’t, because that’s a stupid amount of money to spend to punish yourself for an unorthodox opinion.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I don’t just not see an ethical problem with it if it’s consensual. I’d argue it’s the most ethical way to eat meat in that case. We do horrible things to animals without their consent. If someone consents to being eaten, that must be more ethical.

      You can argue it’s disgusting or something, but if you’re arguing with ethics as the basis, consensual cannibalism has to be better than eating other animal meat.

      • domdanial@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        My biggest argument for ethics is that if it is legal to do, it will be easier to provide incentives for it. Already a problem with illegal substances and such I guess.

        The rich and powerful have a problem where the normally unattainable luxuries/curiosities in life are freely available and boring. It’s why you see millionaires doing crazy stunts, and so many get into illegal drugs or trafficking, like with Epstein and his ilk.

        They can offer money, power, or other benefits to those who don’t have it, and also manipulate the circumstances in their favor, and create a market for human meat. One where the poorest of people could sell their own parts/body, or create parts for consumption if supply drops. Our current system does the same with labor, but that seems significantly less damaging.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Your argument is valid, but by the same logic selling yourself for work is unethical, yet we all do it. I agree there is logic to it and the system of incentives is messed up, but I don’t necessarily agree selling yourself for cannibalism is any worse than selling yourself for labor.

      • zea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        People just like to rationalize their disgust. It’s probably also why homosexuality is supposedly immoral.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    If I’m dead, I absolutely would have no quarrels with people eating my body. Nothing to complain about since I hold no beliefs that when I die, my body needs to be intact for me to go to a heaven like place.

    Also, who cares what any family members would think. It’s my body, not theirs. If I don’t mind people nibbling on my corpse, then I’d hope any family that cares about me is able to respect that wish.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      To be fair, if you’re dead you’ll have no quarrels with anything. I understand what you mean though. You have no quarrels now if someone eats you when you die.

  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    If anyone wants to kill and eat me, go right ahead

    It’ll be nicer than dying alone and having my body rot in my apartment till someone eventually checks on me

  • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    ey gonna be honest, i wouldn’t want to eat human flesh, even when im starving.

    however if my dead body can save someone’s live then they gotta do what they gotta do. it’s not like i need it anymore

  • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    idk man I think the mental gymnastics go the other way around here. You have to make a shit load of assumptions to consume human flesh safely and ethically:

    • the person being eaten consents to their body being eaten
    • the person has no family or each and every one of their relatives consents and is totally ok with their loved one’s body ending up in a casserole
    • the person has no diseases that can be transmitted by consuming some or all parts of their body: prion disease (brain), AIDS, hepatitis and loads other blood-transmitted illnesses, to name a few obvious ones
    • there are no drugs or medications in the person’s body that could be absorbed into your system (regurgitated meth, yummy!)
    • you have the means to effectively and safely process or cook the body yourself or we set up an entire new industry around mass human body consumption which sounds like the plot of a Stephen King novel tbh

    As some have pointed out here, if eating human meat is your only available choice in an extreme life-or-death survival situation, it would have to do, but unless you also have the means to carve up and cook the body, you’re actually going to consume more energy digesting the raw flesh than what you’re getting in return. Humans make for rather poor food overall, that’s a fact. I would back this up with some evidence but I don’t feel like being put on a list for looking up the nutritional contents of human bodies lol

    • Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t care for cannibalism but the second bullet doesn’t sit right with me. I always wanted to be composted. My family will hate that, but I don’t think it’s their choice.

      • NaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Funerals are for the living, not the dead. I struggle to think of a good reason not to acquiesce to their wishes prior to dying, so as to make their grieving easier, given that yours will not matter at all then.

    • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      the person has no family or each and every one of their relatives consents and is totally ok with their loved one’s body ending up in a casserole

      Assuming your first condition is already met then nah, a person’s own wishes as regards their own body ought to supersede those of anyone else

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Prions are a big problem for cannibalism since they resist high temperature. So they’re still deadly even if the “meat” is well cooked. That said, Bones And All was a great film about cannibalism. And it was romantic, in a fucked-up way.

  • Thurstylark@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Heh, my partner and I have already had the, “I don’t seek it out, but if we’re life-and-death stranded and you go first, sorry, you’re provisions now” conversation.