• kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You don’t think ~$31,000 spent productively per every single homeless person in the US could effectively reset the homeless crisis?

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sure it would help significantly. It would most likely be the most successful initiative in human history. But it won’t “end homelessness”.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I feel like that’s pedantry on whether the definition of “end homelessness” means, 0 homeless forever vs, homelessness is a small, manageable problem again.

        And if say, half of that 20 billion were put in a perpetual trust it could give a perpetual budget of 100s of millions of dollars to fund maintenance and social work staff to continue to better manage the problem.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Possibly, but the text already specifically says “in America”. I feel like if you add qualifiers like that, you have already partitioned the problem as far down as you intended.

          • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            I guess but then you have to stop expanding what they mean by the solution. You’re not partitioning the statement of the problem any further but you’re seemingly appending “forever” to the end of the solution as well as other problems that go along with homelessness. $30,000 each is enough to get every currently homeless person in the US some form of legal shelter, by definition ending homelessness in the US, however briefly.