Even gamers nexus’ Steve today said that they’re about to start doing Linux games performance testing soon. It’s happening, y’all, the year of the Linux desktop is upon us. ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

Edit: just wanted to clarify that Steve from GN didn’t precisely say they’re starting to test soon, he said they will start WHEN the steam OS releases and is adopted. Sorry about that.

  • brewbart@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whelp I tried to switch several years ago to PopOS! as daily driver. Everything was fine and dandy until I tried to use the side buttons of my Razer mouse or my Keychron M3. Short story: not plug-and-play-able. This is a non negotiable feature for me. Maybe I’ll find some motivation between the years to tinker again…

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The only bastion left is anticheat. Everything else are just (bad) old habits fueled by marketing.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Anti-cheat systems already have to make changes, since Microsoft have plans to significantly restrict kernel mode access after the major Crowdstrike issues earlier in the year. Kernel mode code is very invasive, difficult to get correct, and can result in major security holes or stability issues if not written correctly.

      A bug in userland code may crash that one app. A bug in kernel mode code can (and often does) cause bluescreens, that people blame Microsoft for. I’m sure they’re tired of being blamed for buggy code written by other companies.

      Running the anti cheat code in userland will (in theory) make it easier to run on other OSes too.

      https://www.notebookcheck.net/Microsoft-paves-the-way-for-Linux-gaming-success-with-plan-that-would-kill-kernel-level-anti-cheat.888345.0.html

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      …and VR. VR is already finicky on its own, gaming on Linux can be finicky in different ways, and the issues multiply if you have two things like that.

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Tends to depend on the headset you own, some work perfectly. Also, Valve is very likely releasing a headset based on SteamOS, which should help.

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I work in VR, I play in VR, including Windows games, all on Linux. No specific problem for me on that front.

  • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I jumped into Linux, via Mint, about a year ago when I refreshed my hardware. The transition was pretty easy, and I haven’t looked back. Steam runs fine and I haven’t had a modern game that didn’t work under default proton settings except for things I’ve run outside Steam and mods. Most of my personal PC’s workload is gaming and handful of web-based apps that are effectively OS-agnostic; Everything else has an easy equivalent in the apt repos.

    I would say that my decision to embrace Linux as my OS was primarily influenced by my Steam Deck. Gaming on it has been simple and the desktop UI was easy to adapt to. I replaced my laptop with the Steam Deck, bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and a USB-C dock with HDMI out (all things I already had for the laptop). I now just hook into whatever TV is handy as a monitor when I need a computer on the go.

    I was a tech enthusiast when I was younger, and am thus familiar with fucking around on the command line, but now I’m an old man who just wants his stuff to work and it just has… The barrier of entry for the Linux Desktop is effectively gone. We just need PR now.

    Also, I think I’d replace Mint on my primary PC with SteamOS, given a simple way to do so. About a year ago, the desktop/beta SteamOS was not fully baked.

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      You should give Bazzite a go on your desktop, it’s very similar to SteamOS and the desktop experience has been great for me. I didn’t have a Steam Deck and transitioned to it, and the smoothness convinced me to get a Lenovo Legion Go and install Bazzite straight OOTB.

  • somenonewho@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve been using Linux exclusively for ~14 years now. Heavily gaming on Linux only for the last ~8 years.

    It was possible (though sometimes headache inducing) to play most games back then (Wine and soon Proton to thank) the biggest change IMHO came with SteamPlay since it turned the headache into one click on most games (thanks to the amazing work of wine/proton developers and the tinkering of the community).

    When the SteamDeck released people seemed surprised at the breadth of games that were running on day one. To me it was not really a surprise since I had been Linux gaming with SteamPlay all the time and was almost expecting games to “just work” (though I still would and still am checking ProtonDB before purchase).

    What the SteamDeck changed in my view was

    1. Showing “everyone” that Linux Gaming is a thing that’s happening and been happening for a while. So maybe check it out?
    2. That a Handheld that doesn’t have to work around Windows but uses a purpose built OS just makes a lot more sense

    I feel that the SteamDeck with SteamOS has really put Linux, especially Linux gaming on the map. Even though I want to be like “Linux Gaming has been a thing forever, I was doing it before it was cool” ;) I have to recognize that fact. In the past years I’ve seen so many people setting up Linux especially by the way of SteamOS (using HoloISO, Chimera …) just to play/mess with it which is also why I think an Official SteamOS release will make a huge difference.

    Tl;dr: Gaming on Linux was a thing before. But the SteamDeck/SteamOS 3 made a huge impact nonetheless.

    • specterspectre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      It still feels like magic at times. The SteamDeck is my backlog steamrolling machine (pun intended). Almost every game in my library that I either forgot about or feels wasteful to play on my high-end desktop, runs amazing. I’m replaying Brutal Legend just because it runs so smoothly on my deck.

      When they came out with SteamOS the first time, it felt so good to have a games run on Linux without fiddling with Wine. Those were dark times. The few people making an effort to run their games with the tools they had available where really putting in work to make it happen.

      God, I remember searching the ends of the internet to get Starcraft running at some point. I managed to kinda get it going but it might have taken a few days of troubleshooting silly things.

      If you’ve been at it for 8 years, I appreciate your efforts.

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I haven’t run across a game that hasn’t run on The Deck yet. I know it’s capable of running quite a lot, but I got it to play indie games. It’s been great and does what I want it to do phenomenally. Additionallh if I ever wanted to do something more demanding on it, I could.

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Most demanding thing I’ve tried on it was beam ng drive, it ran but struggled a bit. I’ve never yet been unable to play something I wanted to on it.

  • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I saw a post on bluesky saying Steamdeck can’t be widely adopted because of linux. I asked why is that the case? He says "Linux doesn’t run as many games as windows ". I said “only a few and the anti cheat ones”. He kept arguing. I asked him about nintendo and he goes “It has the games to back it up” and I blocked him lol.

    Millions of games are not enough because its FOMO.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      Linux doesn’t run as many games as Windows

      I’d argue it runs more due to compatibility breaks. Wine just-werks with a lot of old installers.

      • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Indeed. I couldn’t get a couple of old 3DO games working on windows 10/11 even though I bought them on Steam.

        Work great on Linux w/ Photon (aka wine).

      • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Hit or miss sadly, but still damn close to magic. I can play skyrim and it runs… As expected, but can’t install dark souls rn.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’ve got Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition (with DSFix) working just fine.

          I don’t remember having to do anything weird… Have you tried ProtonGE? Maybe it was DSFix that makes it work? I don’t remember if I tried playing without DSFix first.

          • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            My copy’s pirated thats prolly Why u don’t have issues, I’m launching the installer wine installer.exe

              • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Rip. At least my gta5 dodi repack plays… OK. Either play a pirated copy of gta5 or simply don’t play it at all cus my legitimate copy can’t play cus its epic games and the cockstar launcher won’t connect to the internet thus locking me out of the game, even offline🤡. It has issues with light, when it hits at certain angles the whole map becomes white AF and things from a distant draw poorly, like mountains and such. Other than that thank god triple a games are at least playable on gnux. Ty crackers and ty wine+proton :3

                • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  It has issues with light, when it hits at certain angles the whole map becomes white AF and things from a distant draw poorly, like mountains and such

                  WTF

    • TheLastHero [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      any game that needs to install a rootkit on my computer to play it was never going on my computer anyway. Proton can more or less handle every else on linux at this point. Hardware driver support is getting quite mature too. 2025 is legitimately the year of the linux gaming desktop imo.

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I have both. As a pure console I still prefer the Switch, and there is a huge overlap in the games. But the Deck is much more than just a gaming handheld, it is now my only PC as well.

      • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I understand why there are so many Nintendo gamers. I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy of people. Whenever it comes to linux, they demand everything be perfect. They never show the same attitude towards others. Captialism shills.

        • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Nintendo has fans and is an established brand. But I think what most people dislike is the uncertainty. With the Switch you can know for certain all games you buy will work, but with the Steam Deck it’s not guaranteed though it will scan your library and give you a rating. Though in my case I had many “unsupported” games actually work flawlessly.

          • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            I think is more of like the fear of the unknown than the uncertainty, for example is uncertain if a new switch game will run well(looking at you pokémon)

  • argarath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This is the fifth person I see misinterpreting what Steve said about doing Linux performance testing, they aren’t going to start doing this soon, they will only start doing it WHEN SteamOS is released for desktops! It was very clear on the video FFS

    I’m also really fucking excited for that tho, I recently switched to mint and helldivers 2 actually feels smoother than on windows, it has been such a good experience!! I cannot imagine how much better things will get with more people jumping to Linux and thus game makers actually pay attention to us

      • argarath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Thanks you! And sorry if I was too aggressive, reading it again it sounded way more aggressive than I expected, I just wanted to sound energetic instead, my bad

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve been daily driving Linux since 2017, I started with Ubuntu and it’s been great. I recently got a Lenovo T14 Gen 1 and put Linux Mint 22 on it, and I’ve been playing some games on it and it’s been pretty nice for such a portable laptop.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m excited, but I wish gpu manufacturers would jump on board with physically compatible cards with ffs or smaller form factor business machines. HP, Dell, et al like to limit space for traditional GPUs in those machines. If there was a half height mid/low grade gpu with components on the reverse side that would be a great couch gaming machine.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        If I recall Intel’s GPUs are a little slimmer right? But I’ve heard middling results with compatibility and such.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I have the sparkle brand intel low profile single slot in an hp sff PC and it barely fits and leaves about 3/8" space between the power supply. It has all the room in the world in the backside. One slot over is a 1x pcie slot if only hp had switched the two or the video card had straight through and out of the case cooling.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve been saying for years: we need a dedicated gaming operating system.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        6 days ago

        cloud native

        Already rings an alarm bell, but thank you for sharing regardless.

        Also, their website runs like shit. I don’t have much hope for them making a gaming OS that doesn’t, but time will tell.

        • asap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          That is astoundingly judgmental. Good lord.

          Cloud native is a weird term I’ll agree, but it just means container based.

          Bazzite is amazing and worth a try. I’ve been using it as a daily driver for nearly a year now.

          Perhaps you’d prefer the Github over their “shit” website: https://github.com/ublue-os/bazzite

          Or perhaps you’d like to positively contribute to the state of Linux gaming, and make some suggestions for the website in their post just for that: Requesting input: Bazzite’s website

          • quarterlife@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            At this point when people tell me the website runs like shit I just laugh and tell them they’ve been filtered. That does 120 FPS on a phone, if you’re lagging on that site just go ahead and give up on gaming.

            • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              The animations are stuttery for me on … Fedora Linux.

              I bet they’d be smooth as butter on Windows. x)

    • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      No we don’t. Who needs that? That’s what consoles are for. Every time I want to play on my computer I would need to dual boot and change to the OS? That’s nonsense

      Game Devs and device driver Devs need to get their shit together and fix things.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Or even better, a dedicated gaming runtime environment. And that env can then be made multiplatform.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    Every game I bought on Steam under Windows runs great on Steam in Linux Mint. The few games I didn’t buy on Steam (Deus Ex, Giants: Citizen Kabuto) run great on Wine, using the default settings.

    Adopting Proton was the smartest thing Valve ever did. They’re going to get about 90% of gamers migrating from Windows to Linux, who don’t want to fiddle with configuration settings.

  • Noved@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    New to the Linux community here; why is a valve owned Linux OS better than any other massive company OS. Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

    At the end of the day, we don’t want our OS’s big company owned right?

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      SteamOS is better than, for example, macOS and Windows because of licenses.

      Since you’re new (welcome!), I should let you in on a little secret: pretty much the entire free software movement is built around licensing. I know, it’s boring and seems insignificant. But the outcomes are profound.

      Because SteamOS is built to function within the free software ecosystem, it means users are never beholden to the decisions of one centralized entity (usually the company that owns the software patents.)

      If Valve ever decides to, say, include candy crush ads in SteamOS’ start menu (they’d have to make their own start menu, since right now SteamOS uses one that’s already made by the free software community), then users can choose to remove that part of the menu or replace the menu altogether without having to start from scratch.

      For wealthy people who can always pay the “proprietary tax,” this might seem like a non-issue. Practically speaking, these people only want their software to work without hassle. They don’t care about the true cost of that software, such as only one entity being able to modify/distribute the software. It’s not until, say, photoshop starts charging a subscription (which they can always increase the price of) that people start to see the value in free software and the importance of licensing.

    • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      Microsoft is deeply entrenched and has undergone decades of enshittification. SteamOS is at only the beginning of this cycle. And since SteamOS is linux-based, it’s likely to have ramifications for the whole GNU/Linux ecosystem. Furthermore, if there are two vastly different OSes that developers and graphics card manufacturers need to seriously target, they’re more likely to write more platform-agnostic software that everyone can benefit from.

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Because valve is a private company. They don’t have to answer to shareholders. That means, they don’t go through enshitifaction, they care about their product and their customers. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, are they good? Better than every single company out there that tries to be like them. Period.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I’m glad people bring this up.

        Private companies are not intrinsically better than public ones, but at least they have the capacity to be.

        Valve is one of the very few examples of a company that sees the value in working with customers, not against them. This would be impossible if Valve were publicly-traded.

        • penquin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Exactly. They’re (as far as I know) the only company that emailed me to tell me that I can take to court directly without an arbitration. Not that I’ll ever be able to afford it, but seeing how confident and pro-consumer (I fucking hate the word consumer lol) they are is amazing.

          • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            To be fair, that was in their own financial best interest. Since arbitrations are charged a fee per customer someone figured out that you can do an effective “class action” against valve by having many people submit the same arbitration claim against valve and costing them so much through the arbitration fees that it it was almost impossible for them to cone out on top regardless of the outcome of the arbitration (iirc).

            They changed to allowing lawsuits because they can request those to be merged, and therefore its cost-effective for them to fight them.

            • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Since arbitrations are charged a fee per customer someone figured out that you can do an effective “class action” against valve by having many people submit the same arbitration claim against valve and costing them so much through the arbitration fees that it it was almost impossible for them to cone out on top regardless of the outcome of the arbitration (iirc).

              It’s not even that they’d have to pay for it; usually the filing party has to pay. Valve tried to be the good guys and while they did push for arbitration they said that they’d pay your arbitration fee for you, basically allowing you to file a legal complaint against them at their expense.

              And then some fucking legal company figured out it’s a neat loophole on how to bleed them through arbitration where the point isn’t really the result but the costly process. Guess that’ll teach Valve to try to be better than others. :|

    • Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I am not gonna use SteamOS. But if a bunch of regular folk do, then it might convince peripheral and game makers it’d be worth putting in a modicum of effort to support linux. That’s why I’m excited for SteamOS.

    • Biorix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Because it’s open source and based on the Linux kernel. It’s owned by them but you can do what you want with it. You can’t with Windows.

      So if a game works on the Steam OS, it works on pretty much any distro

      I game with Steam on Linux, but I’m not using Steam OS

      Also, that means that every effort made by Valve to improve compatibility is beneficial to everyone.

      Edit: Also, even if it were closed source, I think it would still be good as it gives us alternatives to Windows. But

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Valve dosnt really “own” SteamOS. They maintain and update SteamOS, but SteamOS is free and open source

      Plus just about everbody who knows anything about valve would tell you they are probably the most consumer friendly billion dollar company ever, and have been for decades. So yes even if they owned it like microsoft owns windows it would still be better

    • Tankton@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      The source is always free so you could fork it if you disagree with them. Also it means broader support for Linux gaming

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

      It’s worth noting that steamOS, like any Linux distro has its issues and a bit of a learning curve. Especially if you want to go off the beaten track, it’s pretty much just using a stock arch distro.

      As for if MS switched to Linux, no it wouldn’t be good because the issues with Win11 overwhelmingly aren’t a matter of incompetence or anything inherent to the code, but of conscious anti-consumer business decisions. There’s nothing about Linux that would actively stop MS from cramming telemetry, bloat, etc. In their distro.

    • beaiouns@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      If it’s like the steam deck version, it’ll be based on Arch with a bunch of steam-specific patches/configs to make games run more easily (with the added bonus of making non-steam games run pretty well too). Steam exists to sell games, and if they want to make it easier for me to play games, that’s fine by me.

      Not sure what a Microsoft distro would look like, but if they make a distro that’ll run Xbox games with gamepass, I’d give it a shot.

      Another nice bonus for either/both of those situations is that it wouldn’t be too hard to incorporate those changes into other distros. That way people who want more of an “install and go” experience would have their official distros, people who like to tinker could work on importing the official code into their unofficial setup, and people who use arch btw can install it from the AUR.

    • Grofit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not answering your comment directly, and I don’t even use Linux, BUT…

      One reason a lot of us don’t use Linux even if we really want to us because it’s biggest strength is also one of its biggest weaknesses, that being it’s modularity.

      There isn’t a single packaging system, window manager, file system, shell, etc etc.

      This makes it hard for companies (and devs in general) to target Linux for releases. For example you want to release something for Windows, you build a single exe, apple is a dmg (I think) etc so you just build for one single platform with a consistent API.

      When you want to build for Linux there can’t be just one build/package. This has actively been cited as reasons why some commercial software doesn’t support Linux, as it takes far more effort to support all major permutations of platform and package management.

      So back to your question, why is Valve’s Steam OS going to help? Because it’s going to be a single platform with a single way of doing things. You can always go and replace the bits like any Linux distro but out the box it will be easy enough for vendors to support, it will hopefully also get more adoption because it has commercial support.

      Look at Android as an example (I know it’s not entirely the same), but that is just a customised version of Linux, but as it’s consistent and has a single way to manage packages it’s widely adopted.

      I am pretty sure Linus himself said how one of the reasons why Linux desktop doesn’t have mass adoption is because no one can agree on how things should be done, so we have hundreds of libs all doing the same thing in a different way. Valve will pick what they think is best (even if it isn’t technically the best) and through that we all have a singular point of effort and adoption to centralise on.

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s way easier to move from one Linux distro to another if Valve starts enshittifying SteamOS (which would really suck) than it is to move from Windows to Linux. Either way this is a good stepping stone that’s well supported.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I have about 7-9 months to decide what to do with my PC. I don’t want to move to windows 11. Because I will have to basically fresh-install my entire system that has 4 drives and god knows how many antiquated programs on it from the XP, Vista and 7 era that I still use. and Im just not ready for it. Im too busy

    headache

      • spirinolas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I’ve went from 7 to LTSC. I didn’t realize how cool LTSC was until I had to use a W10 machine at work. There’s a good chance I’ll go full Linux when the support ends but I’ll have enough time to consider it.

      • wobfan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yes! Did the same, I really like it. This is what a Windows should be like. Also, long support. I just ask myself why I didn’t switch to it earlier.

        Nobara (Fedora based Distro with tweaks for gaming) is also a nice choice, but I still don’t want to fully switch to it for gaming because of Anti Cheat.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Its just gonna be a question of how unsecure Win10 gets , and how fast.

        My pc is from 2019, although I’ve upgraded the hardware several times. But I’ve basically reached a ceiling of practicality, its no longer practical to upgrade anything. Im on an outdated chipset (AM4) and jumping from a 3080 to a 4080 isn’t really going to fix the problem of games just being unoptimized. It makes more sense to build a new PC than it does to just change OS on this.

        but right now, it just doesnt make sense to build a new PC either… I dont lift a finger on anything unless im going to be able to see at minimum 20% performance increase, I just dont see that without emptying my savings account…

        • penquin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Im on an outdated chipset (AM4)

          Bruh, why do you have to say that? 😂. I just built my PC a couple of months ago and I bought an AM4 and I thought I had some kickass specs.

          • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I bought one when I upgraded my truenas, solid performance paired with good nvmes and motherboard, no issues.

            • penquin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              110%. Mine is serving me very well. I play video games in 4k, be it not 736648 FPS/Hz/refresh rate or whatever those imaginary numbers are, but I’m having fun.

          • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            No worries about that, it was a bad wording. The company has stopped producing it, and that’s it. Your cpu is fine, compatible with current software, and can serve you well for still a long time.

            Corporations were so successful in promoting consumerism, that they already messed with us on a psychological level.

            • penquin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Oh it’s totally fine, my friend. I just thought it was very funny. No hard feelings towards the commenter at all. I even actually laughed out loud. I’m that guy who never buys a brand new car, always used and has to be a great deal. Shit works, why spend the extra money? When you are bron born and raised in a poor 3rd world country, you learn to be very careful with your money when you have it.

              • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                When you are bron and raised in a poor 3rd world country, you learn to be very careful with your money when you have it.

                Oh, I totally feel you there. Nice to see a fellow third worlder around!

          • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Realistically the AM4 is still more than enough for now. but its technically end of life. the AM5 isn’t worth the jump until theres no other option.

            • penquin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Oh yeah, it is doing all I want it to do. Plus, on Linux I’ve learnt that having a bit older hardware is always better since the software for it is mature and works no problem in most cases. Absolutely zero complaints for what I paid for it. $500 for a whole PC is unbeatable

          • Sheldan@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            They did still release a few ones recently for them. But am5 is the main one right now. It’s not incredibly old, just no new ones will probably be produced. (I think the last am4 were a surprise already) Just for curiosity, why did you go with am4?

            • penquin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              The honest answer(s), money and I didn’t know any better, especially in the AMD side. I hadn’t learnt their numbering schemes and I saw Ryzen 7 and thought “hell yeah”, but it turned out it’s a 5700G and the newest is the 7000 series. lol. Still powerful as hell. I bought the whole thing from microcenter and I had the salesperson pick the parts for me. I restricted him to $500 and that’s all we were able to get with that money. I have no issues with it whatsoever. I can play all of my games on 4k mid to low settings. Not much fps, but I’m a guy who’s ok with a game if it runs at 30 fps.

            • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              might have been a deal. some retailers are dumb and think lower number means worse, so discount justified. lol

              • penquin@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                100% nailed it. I bought all parts for $500. Works great. The processor is a Ryzen 7 5700G and it comes with an iGPU, so I didn’t get a dGPU at the time, a friend of mine had an RX 580 laying around and gave it to me. Gamed on it for about a year or less, worked fine. Later on, I got an RX 6600 from Facebook for $100.

                • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  They are end of life now and have ceased production, but if you can manage to find a 5800X3D , that CPU is the definition of sleeper. I had a 5700X I think it was, and the performance boost was f***ing unreal, I expected meagre gains, I saw 20 to 50% performance increase on many games. if you’re into that kind of thing. if you see one for sale, seriously think about grabbing it.

                  its the whole reason aside from the OS issue, Im not even remotely worried about the next few years, it can compete with the high end stuff of the AM5 generation still. unreal.

        • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It makes more sense to build a new PC than it does to just change OS on this.

          I haven’t made comparisons with gaming, tho I know there is somewhat, but there’s been a big performance boost on desktop and regular applications running Bazzite over Win10.

        • polle@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Not a good advice. A friend of mine is still on win7 and it still works and got security updates time to time. But some programs actually stopped working or only older lts versions remain workings. Win10 is probably still ok for a year or two.

          • biptoot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Absolutely not. Windows 7 may still function, but it is a target for unpatched vulnerabilities. Attackers are actively seeking windows 7 hosts for remote code exploits, lateral movement, and privilege escalation.

            Do not run Windows 7. Stop running Windows 10 after the end of life date next year.

  • Patariki@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just build a new gaming/creative pc, decided to make the jump to linux mint while i was setting up something new. And I honestly expected more hickups than i got, nothing which a quick search didn’t fix except for one. My xbox controller won’t connect over Bluetooth, it works when connected through a cable though. But I also noticed some stick drift, so I’m tossing it and order an 8bitdo which has those magentic sticks (forgot the name) and linux compatibility.

  • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just did that. I have a dual boot laptop where Windows was used exclusively for games, and instead of upgrading that I built myself a PC with an AMD GPU (Nvidia, fuck you!).

    So far I haven’t run into any problem that I couldn’t easily solve, and the only games that won’t run are those demanding I install an anti cheat system, but I’m fine not playing those.

    • Capsicones@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Very nice! I wish I could use an AMD GPU, but sadly machine learning keeps me on the CUDA platform. Gotta make a living. That said, recent NVIDIA drivers got better on Linux. I can finally use Wayland problem free now. Games on proton also work just fine.

      However, this only works well on Arch, BTW. Really wish I could just use Debian. I’m a computer scientist, but I also get tired of an avalanche of software updates every couple of days; I don’t need all the latest and greatest software. My German internet commection also means I wait up to half an hour sometimes.

      • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Funny enough, I’m on Arch by choice. I was using it before but it makes sense as having the latest packages is good for gaming on it. Luckily I’ve just been upgraded to a FTTH connection so I’m good on that front.

        I had to go back to Xorg though because Wayland was doing some weird shit.

  • gramgan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    I thought this had already happened?

    I remember seeing ads on Steam for SteamOS years ago—wasn’t there a point at which you could download and run it on your own computer? What happened?

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      From what I recall, it wasn’t something you could easily use like a normal distro, and that version was based on Debian (so stable but outdated software). It only worked on some hardware, and you had to do a full system wipe.

      More likely, this is them officially partnering with handheld or gaming laptop makers, using their latest Arch-based distro and allowing them to use Valve/Steam branding as a selling point.

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      If I recall correctly, this has never happened the way it’s happening now. It was a matter of “hey, you can fork it on GitHub and make your own iso thing”, hence why there was a “holoiso” or something like that that (I keep forgetting the name) where people used if they wanted to install steamOS on a device. This one is straight supported by valve. Like “hey, here is our official steam OS that we use on our steam deck. Use it and we will support you”.

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        My understanding is the big change here is that they’re specifically making it available to other handheld manufacturers, which is huge, because windows handhelds have not been great because of how much the bloat of Windows steals performance and battery life. They’re making steps to make SteamOS (I.e. Linux in general) the default OS for handhelds and non-console dedicated gaming machines in general.

        If it works, it will put tremendous pressure on publishers to support linux, which is great.

        • penquin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          A close friend of mine hates Linux with a passion. He always sends me meme about how terrible Linux is. He has the ROG Ally, he texted me the other day to tell me he had to put Bazzite OS on it because it was dogshit on windows. He loves it now. Lmao.

      • bodaciousFern@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Iirc the original steamOS was Debian based and you really had to be an experienced Linux user to use and enjoy it.

        With the new steamOS (arch based?) it’s a much more streamlined experience and opens up the user base because of it

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Old steam os was an Ubuntu derived OS. Ubuntu has issues relating to the organization that runs it. New steam os is basically a coat of paint on top of Arch which is community based. The old os is deprecated.

      The version on steam deck is fantastic, but they have been polishing it for desktop use for a while now. I can’t wait to have it available.

        • Belgdore@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I believe so, but I never used it and didn’t read too much on it at the time. It was designed for the steam machine concept they were trying to push at the time. So it would be weird if it wasn’t.

    • jjagaimo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think modern steamos is based on a different distro then it was then. Also proton is good enough now to justify switching for a lot of people

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, choosing Arch as the base of something that’s supposed to be newbie-friendly and stable is wild, but it seems to have been working so far.

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The issue for me that had me buy a Windows 11 laptop was it was the cheapest I could find. Though I have since then given it away and replaced it with a Steam Deck as my only computer.

    • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Going back to the earliest versions of Microsoft’s on-disk encryption it was backdoored by the feds. They’ve always been the AT&T of OS vendors per US government cooperation