• Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I don’t believe there is good in human nature, so I’m going to remain grossed out by both handles.

  • archonet@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I would bet good money that both door handles are equally filthy, by nature of it being a school. Kids are walking talking germ incubators. We all are, but kids especially. And that’s before we even get into the kids who are intentionally malicious little bastards – I guarantee you, in some school districts, with some kids, signs like these would just be asking for an aspiring Poo-casso to smear their shit on the door handles.

    • kryptonidas@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      The bottom one might be dirtier, with kids specifically wanting to “soil” it because that is “so funny”. And the group that does wash their hands don’t want to touch “the dirty one”.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I would argue that the bottom would be dirtier, not because of kids reflex to be contrarian, but because human nature pushes people to prioritize themselves even at the cost of society. They may not wash THEIR hands, but they are not going to touch other dirty peoples handle.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Plus the bottom handle looks to be about the same height as my butt cheeks. If I can grab it between the cheeks instead of getting my hands dirty then I’m definitely doing that.

          (No, not really, I’m not that talented)

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    And the reason school bathrooms can’t just have kitchen doors that you can back into to open from either direction?

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Newer bathrooms here just don’t have doors. Just two right angles. Can’t see in from the outside, but don’t need to touch a door handle.

      It’s perfect.

  • FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Based on the differences in color for each handle it makes me wonder if the one for not washing your hands is a different material. Maybe an antimicrobial metal like a copper alloy.

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    This problem is solved by having paper towels (air dryers suck) and placing the paper towel trash bin next to the door so that you can use your hand-full of towels as a barrier between the handle and throw the towels away as you leave.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Or motorized door, or no door at all, this clearly isn’t a house, just have an S shaped passage. Voila, way fewer sick people on your building. It quickly pays for itself. And without reminding everyone on every day of how gross humans are.

      • jdeath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        it seems like a good idea to me, but my question is would it lead to more poop particles circulating more widely throughout the building than without a door? ig airports, etc seem fine with it so it must not be a big problem?

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I like public restroom doors that have a handle like protrusion down near the bottom for your foot

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I recall there was a story from Predictably Irrational where the experimenters were trying to figure out how to get participants to avoid double-dipping tortilla chips.

    Along with a control condition, they tried setting up a sign that said “NO DOUBLE DIPPING”, and I think they also tried paying people or getting them to promise not to double dip, stuff like that.

    The thing they found most successful was to set up two bowls of dip: One labeled “For double-dipping”, and one “Not for double-dipping”.

    They supposed that once they had to do a physical action where they sorted themselves according to “what kind of person they are”, they wanted all of their visible actions to be consistent with that.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Interesting experiment but who the fuck doesn’t just eat the whole chip at once?

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s been a long time but I recall a study featured on Freakonomics where a national park tried different signs to get people to not steal rocks. Signs like, “Taking rocks hurts the ecosystem” and “Taking rocks is a crime.”

      The only effective one was something along the lines of, “A million people visit this park every year and leave things alone.” Suggesting that telling people to do the right thing is less effective than peer pressure.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        On the one hand, it’s depressing because people seem to care more about fitting in than being rational.

        But on the other hand, it’s reassuring that we’re so eager to solve things collaboratively that we’re willing to set aside our own personal opinions.

        Our relentless obsession with social connection will either be the thing that kills us or the thing that saves us. And I honestly have NO idea which.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    first off, the clean handle should be on top. the nasty handle shouldn’t drip onto the clean handle.

    second, as you are leaving a public bathroom, reach under your shirt/jacket (hopefully something untucked. ) use the fabric as a barrier for your hand and grab the handle with the front of the shirt/jacket.

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      If you are lucky enough to have a paper towel dispenser, dry your hands with one, use it to open the door, then prop it open with a foot while you throw away the paper towel

    • Einar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      But now you have dry urine smeared over your sleeves.

      Better than on my hands, but…

      • Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        i didnt say sleeves. the underside of the bottom of your shirt. or go to a haberdashery and get yourself a hanky.

        • Einar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Ok. Your first one is “tomatoes, tomatos.” The second is my go-to solution of sorts as well: use a paper towel, open the door, and dump the paper towel in the nearest bin. This usually works more often than not.

    • Mistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      the clean handle should be on top

      I thought so at first too, but when you think about it, that’s the first handle everybody’s going to grab without reading the text, so that would defeat the purpose.

  • undefinedValue@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    This is a game theory scenario:

    1. I’m too lazy too lazy to wash my hands or don’t feel it’s necessary. Upon encountering this door I see both handles and decide to follow their instructions and open the door for unwashed hands. My hands are now unspeakably filthy as filthy people following the signs have accumulated a ton of germs on this handle. I get sick.

    2. I was my hands, follow the signs and use the washed handle. Unbeknownst to me some unwashed game theorists decided that obviously the handle for washed hands would be cleaner so they used it without actually washing their hands first. It’s now also filthy.

    3. I didn’t wash my hands, I don’t give a fuck about signs, use the one most convenient for me.

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      My hands are now unspeakably filthy as filthy people following the signs have accumulated a ton of germs on this handle. I get sick.

      Do you normally get sick when you touch a bathroom door handle? It’s not like people choose not to wash their hands because there’s a separate handle for it.

  • 8000gnat@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Literally scrolling while pooping at work and someone came in, did their thing and left without hand washing. These idiots walk among us.