• saumanahaii@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t wait for Lemmy to get big enough that I can unsub from all the big Lemmies. On Reddit I had a bunch of niche communities that were pretty nice and not political. Now all those spammers I avoided have come here too and the Lemmies aren’t big enough to avoid them yet.

    • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The annoying thing is these people never see themselves as the insufferable bores always taking about local politics.

      It’s always really important.

      It’s always that you’re a nazi if you don’t agree.

      It’s just modern born-again Christians, who aren’t knocking on your door, they’re posting in your social Media.

      • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, when you realize that most of the radical communists on here truly believe that there must be an eternal struggle working towards communism but never actually achieving the goal, it makes sense why they are the way they are.

        Literally had one of them tell me that is beyond unrealistic to expect any state to be able to even implement Socialism to any real degree. Of course, in Marxism a Socialist state must exist before withering away as Communism is fully realized, so they will literally admit that their philosophy is impossible to achieve.

        They fetishize the struggle; they don’t actually want progress, they want to complain.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why do you find it shocking that someone wants their political goals to be achieved but is also realistic with themselves that they may never see them accomplished?

          • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you accept that your goals cannot be accomplished, why maintain them as goals? If you know it is futile, why bother? It is literally a waste of time at that point.

            That said, I personally dont think it is futile. I think it mostly is an attainable goal, minus the withering of the state; I don’t think we could reach a point where the state is completely unnecessary, so I advocate Socialism. I just also think it is ridiculous that someone would try and claim something is futile while simultaneously advocating that everyone adhere to that thing. Their philosophy states clearly attainable, objective goals. If they think it is unrealistic for anyone to ever achieve those goals, then they don’t believe in their own philosophy. That is textbook cognitive dissonance.

            • 31337@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Communism is very utopian and it is not well defined about how it would work in a practical or thoeretical sense (AFAIK). It is something to aspire to. Something to guide your path. One day, something like it may be achieved, but will take a long time to get there. Like, say, carbon neutrality, the “pursuit of happiness,” the elimination of world hunger, to be like Jesus and to not sin, to have pyramids built, etc. It’s a fairly common concept.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s not cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is the feeling of discomfort one may feel when holding contradictory beliefs and forced to reconcile the two.

              Edit: spelling

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to agree with statism, but it sounds like you’re combining the incompatible beliefs of two different people.

        • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.” - Eleanor Roosevelt.

          Which of these are you discussing now?

          • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You should go back to your quotes, its pretty obvious that we are discussing the idea of holding a belief while simultaneously categorizing that belief as impossible.

        • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They fetishize the struggle; they don’t actually want progress, they want to complain.

          In the past they were sitting in cafes across Europe, chain smoking and writing pamphlets.

      • saumanahaii@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d say that fixes the problem, but, uh, pretty sure it’ll just strangle the platform. Really the only thing I can think of is a few people bouying smaller subs with content. Some of the art Lemmies in the ‘imaginaryXYZ’ realm are a good example, with like one person posting content on basically all of them. It’s enough to make it worth subbing though.

        Also I love how a post about how I’m tired of all the politics turned into a political discussion. Like, I do agree with one of the sides, but that’s literally what we’re complaining about.