• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump won. Deal with it and eat shit. Your political scene is a fucking joke and a plutocracy for sale regardless of who is at fault here. Any outcome other then setting the congress on fire is not a good outcome.

    You don’t want to set it on fire? Then shut the fuck up already.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fault is on everyone

    • Non-voters and trump voters

    • russian propagandists

    • “useful idiots” telling people to not vote harris for perceived evil

    • democratic leadership for not having a better platform

    • Kamala Harris, who just cant stop getting pulled towards cheneys like a magner

    • Joe “I don’t wanna quit yet, even tho I’m old as fuck” Biden

    • republicans, who just want to destroy democracy

    Everyone is at fault

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Miserable, isn’t it?

      People want one easy foe to blame, and to exonerate all other forces. Tribal mentality. Absurd from a supposedly educated modern population, but here we are.

      Nearly everyone who had a serious hand in this election is guilty for this fucking debacle. Some by action, some by inaction; some by malice, some by incompetence, some by ignorance, some by sheer fucking stupidity.

      What a fucking shitshow this all was. And will be for the foreseeable future.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The denial of some assholes on here go through is incredible. They won’t hold anyone accountable for their vote. Like who the fucks voting? The DNC isn’t voting. No one is mandating you vote. People vote. And many people let themselves be misled, and shirked all personal responsibility to understand who is leading the country and why and how. The half that voted for that orange asshole fucking deserve what’s coming to this country. I fucking hate it here.

  • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a Brit I’m not immersed in American politics day to day. My (unqualified) take from a million miles away went:

    “Oh, Joe Biden got elected thank god”

    “Oh, he’s promising to only serve one term, good that’s completely sensible”

    “Joe’s running again? What? Could they not find anyone better? This isn’t going to go well at all…”

    “(during that debate) Oh well, looks like Trump’s going to win…”

    “Kamala looks like she would have won if this had been the plan from the beginning, not a sudden fumble when Biden’s brain melted beyond repair on live TV…”

    Seems like - from my point of view- the main culprit was hubris on Biden’s part ever attempting a second term. And in the inexplicable failure of the whole party to force him out of that self destructive choice. Other candidates besides Kamala likely could have won, just seemed like any Dem candidate would be fatally undermined by starting a late campaign.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re not wrong. Biden never formally promised to serve one term, but heavily implied it. Many of us were disappointed when he announced he was running again, but conventional political wisdom that the incumbent has a massive advantage was still a compelling argument. For an incumbent to be forced out is nearly unheard of in presidential politics.

      Even after the debate, I was willing to lend Biden the benefit of the doubt insofar as I considered him to be doing what HE believed to be the best chance of winning. When I learned that he had internal polling showing a total massacre long before the debate, my opinion soured from “Idiot, but I get it” to “Narcissistic moron who lost the country to fascism”.

      Harris started with strong support she could have, potentially, won with, but in the process of ‘defining’ herself to the electorate, chose what she saw to be the ‘safest’ choices in a attempt to not lose that lead. Unfortunately, that lead was largely built on possibility, and in the process of defining herself, especially defining herself in the ‘safest’ possible way, obliterated the ability of all people to see her as all things, and cratered her chances of success. She would have probably had more success with at least a vague argument of change rather than “I can’t think of anything I’d do differently [than Biden]”, even if it created bad blood between her and the president. Whether that would have been enough to win, God only knows, but I think we can all look back and say, at this point, that the ‘safe’ choices were not, in any way, safe.

      • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Tbh honest I was surprised Biden was even a consideration back in 2020, he was too old even then and it made the criticisms of Trump’s age and mental health not land so well. The moment it was a close call in 2020 the plan should have been ‘popular dem by any means necessary’. Not, double down on aging incumbent when they rarely do better on re-election. I can’t tell it if was hubris or a complete failure of the party apparatus to believe it could come up with someone more appealing than Trump…

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It seems like your take on the Harris campaign, boiled down, is basically that they tried to optimize for center too hard? And should have gone farther left? I hope I’m not putting words in your mouth, that’s how it reads to me.

        I agree. Like you said it’s impossible to know how that would’ve turned out, but after seeing this last election, hard not to conclude that Dems need to start spitting some fire and getting spicy. This milquetoast party of reasonable takes really isn’t getting anything done.

        Sure they’d lose some (many) moderates, and I bet they’ve polled and “determined” that they’d lose more votes than they’d gain, but polls can’t capture the momentum generated by a movement for change, the potential support is de facto unobservable under current conditions.

        Regardless, even when Dems “win”, it seems little changes. Really wish they’d start swinging for the fences and see what sticks.

        Edit to add - I agree with your post as well, don’t want to (yet again) hyper focus on Dems-the-party

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It seems like your take on the Harris campaign, boiled down, is basically that they tried to optimize for center too hard? And should have gone farther left? I hope I’m not putting words in your mouth, that’s how it reads to me.

          I would love if they had went further left, but ultimately it’s that they ran on a platform of ‘everything is okay’ when the mood of the country was not ‘okay’.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        She would have probably had more success with at least a vague argument of change rather than “I can’t think of anything I’d do differently [than Biden]”, even if it created bad blood between her and the president.

        Exactly! She should have thrown Biden under the bus! He’s done with politics, his polling no longer matters and fuck his feelings. She should have used it as an opporitunity to highlight all the shit people dislike about him and promise to do differently. She should have used trashing him as a springboard to promise to be better. Instead, she just promised to be Biden 2.0 when nobody even liked Biden to begin with.

      • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That tracks. I was hopeful that Harris would put some more distance between Israel and us than Biden had (not a big or difficult ask, I thought). Her consistant distancing from any Palestinian-adjacent ideas really put the nail in that coffin.

        She was either disappointing or unnoteworthy on most other fronts, but I voted for her anyway.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well you see the Democrats are a gerontocracy and if they pushed him out then they could do the same to someone like Pelosi. Don’t you know it’s their god given right to die in office after years of going senile on live TV?

    • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, anybody who decided to set aside the genocide and vote for Kamala anyway should already have a very clear understanding of how Trump voters can dislike him in many ways but still vote for him.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, fuck the Dems. Still doesn’t absolve any voter who thought that “More funds for the genocide + start a few others” was a good alternative.

      • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have zero shame voting third party but do continue to attempt to shame voters for voting wrong and see how that works for you.

        • Argonne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Agree to disagree. Everyone has their priorities. Trump isn’t going to help Gaza either but will hurt Ukraine and immigrants and other of his enemies. I’m not shaming you, just trying to make you understand that the world is not a black and white place. Choices have consequences and we all live with compromise. Those who refuse to compromise are not helpful either magats or pure idealists like you. Both have a warped sense of the world. I’m not shaming you, just telling how it is. If that shames you then look more inside

              • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Because hurting the libs is fun. Y’all been fucking over the left for decades it’s time you fuck around and find out that you can’t win elections without us.

                Go back to brunch.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  LMAO dude it’s starting to feel like this brunch hangup is personal for you. Never get invited? Me personally, I don’t like brunch. It’s just an excuse for restaurants to raise prices.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Comrade, I’m a leftist frustratingly watching other people who call themselves leftists repeatedly shoot themselves in the foot with their purity nonsense. You’re the one sabotaging the left. We’re never going to get socialism, much less communism, with this stupidity.

                  Even here, on a website composed predominantly of leftists, you’re purity testing everyone and splintering the people. How the hell are you going to accomplish anything if you refuse to acknowledge or work with anyone except for the like 2 dozen people in the entire world who happen to have the exact same beliefs as you?

                  I want the end of capitalism: no more private property, no more oppressive hierarchies, real democracy, the works. I’m probably to the left of easily 99% of the country. If I’m a lib, comrade, who is this “us” you speak of? If no one to the right of me is pure enough, you’re not left with enough people to fill a school auditorium, much less lead a revolution. You’re not winning anything with those numbers, you’re a rounding error.

                  Or is it not a coincidence that your “hurt the libs” narrative is exactly the same goal of the far-right authoritarian party?

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Because they are lying about their motives and about being a minority. That or they’re fucking stupid

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          “I don’t understand why minorities who are going to get the jackboot are so mad at me for welcoming the jackboot :((((((”

          It’s truly inexplicable.

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I will never get these people struggling to understand the lesser evil rationale. Maybe it’s just on a scale and timeline that is for some too difficult to really internalize.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Some are young and don’t really remember much of his last presidency, so it couldn’t be that bad.

          Some are staunch idealists who think voting lesser evil is the same as enthusiastic support.

          Some are secret accelerationists who want things to get worse because they think the proletariat will spontaneously rise up if they’re desperate enough.

          Some are bad faith actors trying to divide the left.

          Some unironically think that both are equally bad.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think they’re struggling to understand it. They become quite excellent at understanding it once it turns to anything they support. China, Russia, Hamas, the Houthis, all the lesser evil. But for ‘some reason’ any time non-authoritarian regimes are involved, they become determined to ensure that the world knows that they’re willing to kill every last minority for their ‘principles’.

          • makyo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah maybe you’re right. The thing that gets me is if they really understood how bad it could get under someone like Trump, like really understood how hard things can get and how fast it can happen - no way they’d hand him the keys to the country. There’s just a real disconnect there that I will never understand.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, I think they still would. I really, legitimately think that they’re the secular equivalent of the Rapture lunatics I grew up with in an evangelical upbringing. They view the current state of affairs as a sinful world which must be destroyed by any means.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, fuck assholes who just killed America and Palestinians while using Palestinians as a prop. But yeah great job pretending to care about Palestinians a single fucking iota, they are in such a great spot due to your completely non-bullshit concern.

      • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        How those kids in cages doing under biden? All that asshole did was continue trumps policies but go offfffff fucking liberal

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you cared about Palestinians even a tiny amount you would have never ever been advocating against the only option that would’ve limited their suffering. So let’s admit to your fraudulency, lIbErTaRiAn

          • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            You know, fuck off, you’re blocked. I got better things to do than argue with electoralist liberals who push the status quo and by doing that push the country straight into fascism. Keep voting blue no matter who I bet next elections gonna work! I bet next time you’ll be able to reason with the fascists in both parties!

            How those kids in cages doing? You know that was happening under biden right? Or because msnbc didn’t throw a shit fit over it once biden got elected it never happened right? Fucking sheep.

            Go back to brunch liberal. You lost and you’re too stupid to figure out why.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Took me seriously about the brunch quip I see. I was being sarcastic. That shit was lame and stale years ago

              Glad to be blocked by a fraud though. Now when I oppose your pathetically disingenuous bullshit my inbox won’t explode.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    PROTIP: Dems being spineless, brainless cretins does NOT absolve anyone who said that sitting by and letting fascists take over the country was preferable! And yes, you CAN blame the voters for that!

    The voters did not magically come to the ‘correct’ decision to sit this out by the spirit of democracy whispering in their ear; they did so because they believed that fascism won’t be ‘that bad’ to them, personally! And no amount of blaming Dems for being gutless corporate weasels can change that being an accomplice to deliberately driving fascists deeper into power is not a forgivable offense!

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      PROTIP: Dems being spineless, brainless cretins does NOT absolve anyone who said that sitting by and letting fascists take over the country was preferable! And yes, you CAN blame the voters for that!

      I realize how old-man-ish this will sound (although in my defense I am literally becoming an old man) but there’s a widespread lack of personal accountability these days. Everything must always be someone else’s fault.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        There is something wrong and I’m not sure it’s personal accountability. It may be my mental illness or just my antisocial behavior but I’ve never been able to ignore the broader issues with the world.

        I’m not saying mental illness has distorted reality or something. I’m saying because I don’t function like everyone else everything seems inadequate for me.

        I’m also not saying it’s good to be antisocial I’m saying I feel severe anxiety and dread after the simplest of human interaction and it exceedingly more difficult to manage as I get older. So there is no group think I am comfortable subscribing to because the group freaks me the fuck out.

        What ever the cause I have this lense that seems to just be non-existent for most people. There could be a economic aspect to it but I do pretty well comparatively. The only difference between someone my age and myself is I might have less of a savings but my income is acceptable. I don’t have family support but I think generational wealth is few and far between. That could be wrong if you’re accounting for my demographic but it could also be skewed depending on where you live.

        All this to say, some people are completely unconcerned with the condition of society. They are happy pretending everyone is like themselves where what is happening in government or around the world will never effect them personally. I do not share this view. Maybe it’s because I don’t have the dopamine to sustain the positive feelings that Bob Marleys “don’t worry, be happy” song represents but if we look at this election, they need my lense and their lenses can be thrown in the ocean.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Democrats used to promise real change and progress, but they’ve only proven themselves to be the party of stagnation in recent memory. Nowadays they don’t even try to inspire their base, but rather scare them into submission with the threat of Trumpism.

    Sure it’s better than the rapid decline into chaos that the order party is trending towards but this pattern of “a couple careful steps forward then a dozen strides sprinting backwards” isn’t working for Americans. Many of us have lost faith in the system because the system doesn’t work for us. What’s worse is that when we get a candidate who speaks to us, the Democratic establishment shuts them down with more efficacy than they ever seem to direct towards any of the Right’s regressive politics.

    While I still fall in line and vote for somebody who I am not excited or inspired by in a seemingly futile effort to hold the line, many others have given up because their struggles aren’t being addressed or even acknowledged. You can yell at them and criticize them until you’re blue in the face but I can guarantee you they’re either so tuned out that they’ll never hear it or so dug into their own political ideals that they won’t receive it.

    If you want their vote, you’re going to have to earn it.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you want their vote, you’re going to have to earn it.

      “The Dems need to change” and “Allowing fascism is not okay” are not mutually exclusive positions, and I hold to both.

      • BigBenis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think you’re right and that’s ultimately why I voted for Harris but as your original point says either apathy or ignorance amongst many other Americans has grown to the extent that they are willing to risk declining into fascism.

        Are we going to change that by telling them to stop being apathetic/ignorant and that fascism is bad? Because that seems to have been the primary strategy the Dems have run over the last decade and the only time it’s worked for them was when the effects of Trump’s incompetence was unavoidably present in the minds of Americans. I’d rather we not depend on another catastrophe to win the next election, assuming we will have one.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Are we going to change that by telling them to stop being apathetic/ignorant and that fascism is bad? Because that seems to have been the primary strategy the Dems have run over the last decade and the only time it’s worked for them was when the effects of Trump’s incompetence was unavoidably present in the minds of Americans. I’d rather we not depend on another catastrophe to win the next election, assuming we will have one.

          No, the solution is much deeper and more multifaceted. The Dems have the approximate strategic competence of a walnut.

          At the same time, the toxic positivity of ‘agree to disagree’ that has become increasingly present even through the radicalization of the right since the 1990s has allowed many people to entirely detach their increasingly fascist political choices from their social lives, and this must be reversed. The fact that many here on Lemmy seem hell-bent on playing apologist for allowing fascism makes the message particularly important to be said here - we are all responsible for our choices, our choices have moral implications, and we live with those choices forever. There is no washing your hands of your deeds, there is no sitting out and playing innocent. This is not (yet) a despotism; in a republic, citizens have political power, and with that political power, responsibility for what they do or do not do with it.

      • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        And yet, Everytime I see someone talking about the Dems needing to change I see you playing goalkeeper. What’s up with that I wonder aloud for no reason?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          And yet, Everytime I see someone talking about the Dems needing to change I see you playing goalkeeper. What’s up with that I wonder aloud for no reason?

          I suppose because your sense of pattern recognition is damaged.

        • USSMojave@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          He’s not saying Democrats shouldn’t change, just acknowledging that this election result is not 100% on them

          • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s 100% on them. They lost. That’s how democracy works. They didn’t allow a real primary. Their candidate sucked. Their messaging sucked. They ended up with the biggest loss in decades, losing all three branches of government and the popular vote. This is a failure on every level and they don’t get to blame voters.

  • Dupree878@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I didn’t vote. That’s the democrats fault. They didn’t run anyone I would vote for in ‘16, 20, or 24

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If the spineless liberals are empowering the fascists even in years when they hold the majority, then there is no difference between the two.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Both sides are literally the same”

          How predictable. All of us who are going to suffer under the Trump regime thank you for being privileged as fuck.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh, so you’re voting for my death AND your own, how wonderful. So you’re not selfish, just malicious.

              • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                You’re fucking melodramatic, aren’t you? We didn’t let Trump kill us off last time, and we’re not going to let it happen this time either. But don’t worry, while I know democrats can’t be bothered to get off your lazy fucking asses and protest, the trans and LGBT community has armed leftists to support us. We’ll be just fine, so don’t you worry, no need to cancel brunch.

      • TunaCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is a very convincing argument to vote democrat, you must have changed so many minds before the election by shitting on anyone who questioned the status quo.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A decent “party” would dispel “ignorance” rather than thriving on it.

    That’s completely within the bounds of reason.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not even inauguration and we’re going to have to deal with 4 more years of Mr. Trump’s wild ride. Why wouldn’t I “still” be upset?

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, OP and I got into an insanely long argument about this exact thing yesterday that I’m honestly kinda embarrassed I engaged with for so long. Then i woke up to this meme, so…I guess he’s still mad.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Making fun of him for getting so mad at me he had to post isn’t the same as engaging in his circular, bad faith argument, but you can pretend they are I guess. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Posted this long before the conversation had run its course, but it’s cute that you’re still thinking of me. :)

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, it’s mocking the idea that voters aren’t responsible for their own choices, and that the Dems running a dogshit campaign means that voting for fascism or sitting it out and letting fascism take the reins of the country is somehow okay.

      The Dems ran a shite campaign. The Dems are absolutely guilty in this shitshow of fascism we find ourselves in. But the people who deny all moral agency to the voters who sat by and said “Yeah, voting against fascism just isn’t that exciting” is absurd. They’re fucking guilty too.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No he’s saying we must vote for one of the two parties, thereby manufacturing consent for whatever they decide to shovel down our throats.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        And you’re here trying to tell people to either not vote or vote third party and any time someone points out that just was the death of America you have to deflect. You’re reliable to do it in every thread. It is gross.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hahaha no. First of all, politicians have used that bit of PR in every election I’ve ever seen. So that might be a clue as to why you ran around shouting about it and people were like, “yeah, and?” Secondly, I actually shut up about it before the election.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I do not blame people who voted for third parties or write ins. At worst, they make a compelling point to campaigns - that there are many voters that are active, but want another option.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    1. People are busy with more important things than social media, YouTube’s, podcasts, and news.

    2. People will vote with their communities to retain membership: MAGA, church, the family unit (sometimes).

    3. it’s not uncommon for 60% of people not to vote.

    4. Kamala didn’t distance herself from Biden. “They’re isn’t anything that comes to mind” was a coffin nail.

    5. DEMs don’t sell it well. The story told has to be big enough and potent enough to pull in 1, 2, & 3.

    6. What is the point of beating this dead horse? It solves nothing.

  • splonglo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    1 ) public ignorance is a widespread social force not a personal character fault that happens to individually affect the majority of the population.

    2 ) This attitude of moral contempt is actively repellent to the people we need to reach out to, who do not subscribe to your premise. A lot of people don’t think they are fascists - they are wrong, but they’ll still look at you funny unless you can do a damn good job of making the argument. The Dems couldn’t, the media couldn’t, and nobody is watching it anyway. WE have to do it. Make better arguments and reach out to people instead of circlejerking and making our opponents arguments for them.