• Femcowboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Prostitution. Keeping it illegal makes it so much worse for everyone involved except human traffickers.

      • vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I love the idea of someone being brought up for tax evasion charges because they were only claiming a blowjob rate when they were doing anal.

        This could be the most interesting audit in the history of the IRS.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          In my country, to crack down on tax evasion by small businesses people can give their tax payer number when they buy something (say food at a restaurant) and a copy of the receipt automatically gets passed on to the taxman (there’s a lottery on those and people can get some money from it, which is how the State incentivises people to do this, plus you can get some tax discounts on some kinds of expenses such as medicine).

          All this to say that the idea of the taxman getting a copy of an itemized receipt for sex work services is just delicious.

          PS: Around here sex work is unregulated, meaning not illegal (though profiting of other people’s sex work is illegal) but not explicitly legal and regulated.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    For adults, literally everything that doesn’t directly hurt other living things.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Gonna have to disagree with you for two reasons:

      • it’s not actually illegal (except in Australia soon I guess)
      • when everyone’s a user, the social aspect makes it practically impossible for single households to impose limits without making their child a pariah
  • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    For now all I can think of are drugs (every single one, including opioids) and euthanasia (not just for terminal diseases, should be available for everyone who decides to).

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      With limits

      Fentanyl, for example, should require doctors guidance at least, and forced medical help to get off of it when you’re displaying addiction behavior.

      Euthanasia should also be legal, but with strict rules. You want to avoid someone off themselves just because they’re having a bad day

      • tdgoodman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        People already choose to buy and use fentanyl without a doctors prescription, why should they be treated as criminals? If a junkie commits crimes because they are high, that should be criminal, and if a junkie commits crimes to get more drugs, that should be criminal, but I do not see a purpose in criminalizing fentanyl for consenting adults.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          You prohibit Fentanyl because it’s so friggin addictive and lethal. Most drugs are rather harmless (as alcohol is “harmless”) so sure. Just keep an eye on people and where someone falls off the wagon, have them undergoing forced treatment to get them back okay again.

          Fentanyl is like meth, it’s too much, there is no such thing as a little bit or any good outcome

  • Aksamit@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Euthanasia. Access to free and humane end of life services should be a fundamental human right for all adults everywhere.

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Hmmm. Hmmm? I didn’t really think about incarcerated before. But I suppose if you were imprisoned for a law you don’t agree with, the way to change it is voting.

          By keeping prisoners from voting, you prevent law from changing.

          • Demdaru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            The proper way is to respect the law and vote for it’s change, not to break the law and cry after a fact.

            • Poik@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              30 days ago

              I’ve been dating my boyfriend since before it was legal. Thank you for your input, but no. Just no.

      • tdgoodman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Why would it matter if felons voted while imprisoned or free? We should not be incarcerating so many people that their vote has anything beyond a trivial, marginal affect. That is to say the real question is why do we convict so many people of crimes?

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    All drugs except opioids.

    I have to clarify that that doesn’t include using hard drugs in public or operating heavy machinery under the influence ofcourse.