• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The moderate wing feels entitled to those votes.

    And for whatever reason they keep doubling down on refusing to do voter outreach and listening to what Dem voters want. Current leadership will never back away from the strategy of:

    What are ya gonna do, vote R?

    Because it’s obviously not working. As long as we allow the DNC to prioritize rewarding donor bundlers with leadership positions, it’ll never change.

    The only metric is bringing money in, so whoever pays the most gets to determine the party platform.

    Which wouldn’t suck so much if the DNC wasn’t the furthest right option. When that’s how the furtherest left option acts, turnout will always be abysmal and even when we “win” we still lose and billionaires always win.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Moronic hot take.

      The idea is that if trump threatens to kick nonwhites in the nuts it makes no sense for them to vote for him. When they do, it’s not that moderates are entitled, it’s that as a minority you voted like a fucking idiot.

      Sheep vote for wolf: “Why do cows think they deserve the sheep vote?!”. JFC are you asleep at the wheel?

              • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                There isn’t a question in your previous comment.

                And apparently you haven’t heard the one.

                You don’t wrestle a pig in mud because it gets mud all over you and the pig likes it.

                It will only drive up donorship to the Republicans and foster more lenient bribery donation policy from the Democrats going forward.

                The Democrats need to actually submit themselves to overhauling campaign funding if they want to make any headway. But they want that money. They want it more than they want any of their alleged policy goals.

                • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Because of citizens united, money decides election wins. So how do we win without donors?

                  This was the question that you are avoiding.

                  To overhaul campaign funding they need to win. For that to happen they need donors.

                  Also, just because a saying exists doesn’t make it right.

                  • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 days ago

                    They didn’t avoid it

                    They outspent and lost this time.

                    Is a refutation of the premise. If, as you say, donation money decides elections then the democrats, having gotten and spent more, should have won.

                    So, did money decide this election win?