i can’t even guess as to why they went quiet. not one guess at all. we will never know.

edit: well they’re not quiet now once they get called out

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    How did letting Trump win help to end genocide?

    Why did the Democrats feel such a need to commit a genocide? The Democrats message was, “let us commit a genocide, or you’ll see US democracy fall!”

    Maybe the fault isn’t with the voters for refusing to condone a genocide in order to save the democracy. Maybe the fault lies entirely with Democratic leaders who wanted to commit genocide so much, that they were willing to sacrifice American democracy in order to do it.

    The Democrats wanted to commit genocide SO BADLY that they were willing to put US democracy on the line. They felt maintaining a genocide was more important than maintaining democracy. The destruction of the Gazans mattered more to Democrats than preventing Fascism in the US.

    If that kind of demonic choice doesn’t make someone completely unqualified to be president, I don’t know what does.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes. The Dems had a shitty, evil policy on Gaza. But the Republican policy is worse on Gaza and everything else.

      But you motherfuckers decided sending a message to the Dems was more important than Gaza or the rest of the world, and now we’re about to have vaccines and milk outlawed, Ukraine will be taken over by Russia, Concentration Camps will be set up for anyone with slightly brown skin, and more.

      Oh - and Israel will literally kill every Palestinian in Gaza will fully-erect support from Trump and his goons, some of whom are literally trying to bring about the end of the world by eliminating Palestine and returning the Temple to Israel, which is an important part of their Armageddon prophesies.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I propose an omni-genocide.

        Instead of killing one ethnic or religious groups, we kill ALL of them. Well, all but one.

        We will start by selecting a single ethnic group out of a hat. (And I promise it will be fair, truly random.) We select a single ethnicity out of a hat.

        Everyone else goes to the camps. We’re talking 95%+ of the human population here.

        Yes, the death toll will be horrific. But I assure you, it will be for the greater good. Think of how many people down the ages have been killed due to racial prejudice. Think of how many wars have been fought over ethnicity or race. We have a long and bloody history with racism, and this will continue in the future.

        However, you can’t have racism without racial diversity! So by killing everyone except one randomly selected ethic group, we will completely eliminate racism of all forms. Yes, we sacrifice 7+ billion people now, but in exchange, we eliminate all deaths from racism, from now until the end of time! We’re talking trillions, perhaps quadrillions of lives saved! All it will take is the sacrifice of a few billion.

        From a purely utilitarian perspective, you should support my omni-genocide.