Democratic political strategy

  • immutable@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d refer you back to my first comment that explains the structural incentives and disincentives that prevent an alternative to the Democratic Party from emerging

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nope, it doesn’t explain why you’ve got progressives that would rather live with the status quo instead of saying “You know what, fuck you guys, we’re done.” when the party clearly works against them. Hell, there isn’t even a movement comparable to the tea party! I’m more and more convinced that it’s all just a show and they’re just happy the way things are and would rather keep things as is than potentially lose their seat by actually fighting against the status quo.

      • immutable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If there’s something in particular in that original analysis you disagree with feel free to point it out.

        Progressive voters can’t vote for progressive candidates that don’t exist. My analysis explains why progressive candidates / parties don’t emerge in this system.

        When there are progressive candidates progressive voters vote for them, while centrist Dems say they won’t (that’s exactly what Clinton supporters said they would do if sanders won the nomination)

        What exactly do you think “you know what, fuck you guys, we’re done” looks like in the absence of progressive candidates? Maybe the presidential candidate getting 20M fewer votes? That literally just happened.