• Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Now is not the time for criticism, it’s not election season - save that for the primaries”

    “Now is not the time for criticism, the primaries are soon”

    “Now is not the time for criticism, there’s only 100 days to go before the general”

    “Now is not the time for criticism, we just had a huge, crushing loss”

    So are liberals/democrat faithful/etc really committed to never learning, or never listening? When am I allowed to criticize half of the political duopoly that is increasing out of touch not just with my concerns, but openly snubs voting blocs and demands fealty in return for the status quo?

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh absolutely. Let’s get down and discuss all of the policy proposals we want the next presidential candidate to have RIGHT NOW.

      Go.

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        A popular mandate. That’s literally the bar we’re talking about here, and I’m amazed to see people upset that others are pointing out how low it is.

        But when they fake a primary, you don’t get a genuinely popular candidate. When they don’t even hold a primary, you never hear the other opinions in the electorate. Biden owns a lot of responsibility for this loss, but the leadership has their share too for trying to walk this over the line on diet republicanism in a quest to scrape by 270.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, okay, that’s not a policy proposal, but I see you’ve got the beginnings of . . . . party. . policy? Maybe?

          Can you be a little more - y’know, government policy proposal-y? What you’d want the candidate to advocate for?

          Or were you just saying people weren’t allowed to crap on the DNC before the election and now that it’s lost people aren’t being allowed to crap on the DNC because instead of being insufferable assholes with nothing of value to add, actually, colonialist imperialist genocider corporate whores are preventing them from changing the world for good?

          • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Bruh if you wanna argue with yourself, go ahead and build the straw man already

            The argument I’m making in reply to your “stop complaining” post (and that you seem to deliberately be ignoring) is that the DNC and/or establishment Democrats routinely silence internal dissent at any and all times. And that right now they still aren’t listening internally, and have demonstrated a commitment to gaslight voters that inflation isn’t real, and that voters shouldn’t be trusted/allowed to pick who they get to vote for.

            Voters have told us in exit poll after exit poll, that their primary issues are economic uncertainty and cost of living, loss of faith in governance, and then immigration.

            32% of voters nationwide said the economy mattered most in deciding how to vote in the presidential election. 11% said immigration, 14% abortion, 34% the state of democracy, 4% foreign policy.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Okay, so let’s just take as a given that, yes, the Democratic candidates should have focused on the economy, immigration, abortion, and the state of democracy, with apparently 4% of foreign policy thrown in.

              That is what you’re arguing they should have done, correct?

              If so, what do you think they did NOT say about those issues. You can focus on Kamala if you prefer, or the entirety of all Democratic candidates if you want to assert that.

              • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Correct, that’s my argument.

                Economy/ Cost of living: Beyond pithy “I feel your pain” statements and a late-election focus on price gouging and new homebuyer credits, there was not much for the working poor.

                • Nothing about corporate tax dodging or enforcing consumer’s rights - Lina Kahn at the FTC would have been an easy layup and she’s gotten results already
                • Very shy on pro-union messaging Silent about healthcare costs (beyond in-home carers)

                For someone pinched by inflation and/or predatory corporate pricing, being told “more of the last four year’s policy is coming, sorry we have no money - except for Israel” is a huge turnoff.

                State of Democracy: I think the DNC/establishment Dems massively misread this issue as purely J6/dictator Trump - because ignoring the massive democratic disengagement and apathy means they don’t have to address why voters are unenthusiastic about electoral participation at most levels, and instead “it’s all the MAGAs fault” without questioning why the MAGA movement exists beyond “they’re deplorable”. Trump’s vote total basically flatlined from 2020, two different assassination attempts barely moved polling, he isn’t an unknown figure and voters at large do not like him. What he is however, is a break from “more of the same” no matter how damaging or foolish that may be for the world/country. In no order, here’s what Dems should target/message on:

                • Actually running a primary
                • Not cheating in those primaries
                • Alternative voting like ranked choice
                • Not platforming billionaires
                • Evidence of the party coming down on the side of the worker, instead of corporate/moneyed interests during tough choices. The rail strike is a perfect example, but also the East Palestine spill
                • Evidence of the party listening to voters concerns, like not running Biden again or heeding the ‘uncommitted’ movement.
                • Not surrendering to the Republican narrative on the outrage of the day, and being the adults in the room that deliver results for voters instead of distractions. Clap back with “It’s weird to focus on that - we have an economy to solve.” instead of allowing them to controls the narrative
                • Optional@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Well, I appreciate the studied reply, so thank you for that.

                  I just disagree. I thought she was policy-heavy including healthcare position papers and supporting FTC chair, and I disagree entirely that trump is a “change” for anything other than jumping face-first into the pit of hell, just like we did in 2017.

                  As for the bit about DNC being unfair by not running a primary; that’s not really done with a sitting President. Which was the case here when it was time to run primaries. We didn’t do that in 96, 2012, and if Dems ever get elected again, we probably won’t four years after that. That’s not dirty pool - in fact, if I’d spent my career in the BlahBlah party and been elected president, then for my re-election campaign they demanded I go through primaries again, I’d say fuck all the way off. That’s ridiculous.

                  I also think there’s a heavy element about perception of Harris’ campaign which had nothing to do with Harris or her campaign. I thought she was very centered on economics and made some good policy suggestions for those times the corporate news chose to repeat anything about policy. Corporate news was determined - again - to narrate a horse race, and the right-wing is entirely off on their own planet of propaganda shit now so they weren’t even going to try.

                  So TL;DR: disagree she had nothing about the economy for the poor or working class, but it wasn’t way out front either so I’d agree that it should have been. I also disagree that “state of Democracy” wasn’t a big focus, or that how she got to be the candidate was the result of trickery of some sort - that’s just the way it fell and I don’t think anyon could have planned it to look and run exactly like that.

                  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Perception is (unfortunately) reality. While the campaign website and position papers were solid - especially contrasted with Trump’s “concept of a plan” nonsense, if you don’t effectively communicate how those plans are going to impact voters positively, it isn’t going to help you.

                    Biden did in fact win the primary in 2024 before he dropped out - as the incumbent he massively benefited from recognition and campaign staffing, but he still had to run. Had he kept to his “one term president” statement, there would have been an open primary instead of Harris’s ascension.

                    Corporate news and engagement driven profit motive has poisoned democracy for a long time, yellow journalism dates to the 1800s. A mad dash to make a network of “liberal Joe Rogan podcasts” will be effective for direct messaging. But if your messaging is still a defense neoliberalism and globalization, you are going to keep losing. To someone for whom having an extra $50 in their pocket is a big deal, the centrist-Dem message is not worth considering. Paid maternity leave, free healthcare, childcare credits, food stamps, stable employment, worker protections, etc are way more important to working poor voters.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You are more then welcome to visit my ask lemmy post about replacing First-past-the-post voting with a more representative electoral system. No more party worship, no more two party system, no more handcuffs on our wrists.

        We can be free.